Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (11 records) with 2024 (10) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 309 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This dataset tracks 309 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine water dispenser or instant water heating claims with a second technical element — thick film heaters, temperature accuracy, scale formation, standby energy, dispensing flow, or spout hygiene. That pairing narrows the field to records where heating and dispensing engineering intersect, rather than every water appliance patent on file. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the final one to two years of the trend will fill in further as more applications publish.
The technology composition skews toward the appliance and delivery path rather than the heating element in isolation: kitchen and cooking utensil classifications and liquid-dispensing classifications carry the largest record shares, with water treatment, refrigeration, sterilising and heater-specific classes each present but smaller. Receiving-office data shows the United States as the dominant filing venue, followed by Europe and the PCT route, with India, Australia and Israel each contributing a meaningful but smaller slice.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 309-record dataset: filing activity by year, and the IPC subclasses that these records carry.
Annual filings rose from 5 in 2017 to a peak of 16 in 2022, then eased to 10 by 2024 — a -9% change from 2021's 11 filings, read as a plateau rather than a decline given that 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete in the record.
A47J (kitchen and cooking utensils) and B67D (dispensing liquids) lead at 38.5% and 22.7% of the 309 records respectively; C02F (water treatment), F25D (refrigeration) and A61L (sterilising) each sit between 11% and 18%; heater-specific classes F24H and H05B each cover about 11% of records. Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares add to more than 100% and should be read against the 309-record base, not against each other.
Shares are the percentage of the 309 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about water dispensers and instant heating and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe filing describes a water dispenser with three separate dispensing channels sharing a common feed, each gated by its own control component. One channel routes through a heat storage tank and hot water flow regulator, another through a cold water flow regulator, with both regulators electrically tied to the control logic — a design aimed at delivering hot, cold and ambient water from one unit without cross-contamination between paths.Filed by Xiamen Filtertech Industrial Corporation, published September 2025.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4940164A | Drink dispenser and method of preparation | 130 |
| 2 | US5647416A | Bottled water dispenser system | 125 |
| 3 | US20060027267A1 | Systems and methods for detecting and eliminating leaks in water delivery systems for use with appliances | 115 |
| 4 | US20040007553A1 | Pervaporatively cooled containers | 85 |
| 5 | US20030071069A1 | Method and apparatus for disinfecting a refrigerated water cooler reservoir and its dispensing spigot(s) | 85 |
| 6 | US20100154644A1 | Liquid flow control and beverage preparation apparatuses, methods and systems | 65 |
| 7 | WO2008139205A2 | Electrical appliances | 65 |
| 8 | US20050279215A1 | Fluid delivery system for generating pressurized hot water pulses | 56 |
| 9 | US20100154647A1 | Liquid flow control and beverage preparation apparatuses, methods and systems | 50 |
| 10 | US6725687B2 | Drink dispensing system | 49 |
Citation counts favour older records simply by virtue of time in circulation; treat them as a signal of influence on the field rather than of current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →The ranking and citation tables point to a field with a defined top tier, appliance-side claim pressure, and older foundational patents still driving citation counts.
The top five assignees account for 126 of 309 records, and the top ten extend that to 179 records, or 57.9% of the field. That leaves over 40% of filings spread across a long tail of smaller entrants — room to compete on specific mechanisms even where the leaders hold the broad category claims.
Annual filings climbed steadily from 5 in 2017 to 16 in 2022, then settled to 10 by 2024 — a -9% move from 2021's 11 filings. That is a cooling from peak activity, not a collapse, and the newest years in the dataset are still under-reported due to publication lag.
The most-cited records date back to drink and bottled-water dispenser mechanics and reservoir disinfection methods, several with citation counts above 80. These older filings function as prior-art anchors that later hygiene and flow-control claims are drafted around, more than as evidence that dispensing mechanics are still the active frontier.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to water dispensers and instant heating, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| S I P Tech L L C | SHELTON JAMES J | 6 |
| Strauss Water Ltd | Strauss Water Ltd | 4 |
| Advanced Porous Technologies LLC | SMOLKO DANIEL D | 3 |
| Advanced Porous Technologies LLC | KEVORKIAN GREGORY | 3 |
| Strix Ltd | NICHOL NORMAN ERIC | 2 |
| Strix Ltd | MOUGHTON COLIN | 2 |
| Strix Ltd | GARVEY VINCENT JOSEPH | 2 |
| Otter Controls Ltd | WRIGHT PETER | 2 |
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest pairing links a technology entity with an individual inventor rather than two corporate partners — most filers here protect their own claims independently rather than through joint filings.
The ranked leaders sit across appliance manufacturers, component specialists (kettle and heater controls) and water-treatment brands, each anchoring different parts of the IPC composition described above.
The leading assignee holds 44 records, well clear of the fifth-place assignee at 16 and tenth place at 8 — a steep drop-off that marks this as a leader-plus-field structure rather than several closely matched rivals.
Every one of the assignees tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest year on record, consistent with publication lag rather than an actual halt — applications filed in the last 12–18 months have not yet cleared into the public record.
The United States receives more filings than any other office in this dataset (117), ahead of the European Patent Office (41) and the WIPO/PCT route (30), with India, Australia and Israel each in double digits — a filer targeting one jurisdiction for freedom-to-operate work should start with the US corpus.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Whirlpool Corp | 0 | — |
| Advanced Porous Technologies LLC | 0 | — |
| S I P Tech L L C | 0 | — |
| Strix Ltd | 0 | — |
| Strauss Water Ltd | 0 | — |
| CALDERA HEAT BATTERIES LTD | 0 | — |
| BIOSURE NORTH AMERICA LLC | 0 | -100% |
| Otter Controls Ltd | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next steps for teams deciding where to file, litigate, or design around existing claims.
Standby energy, scale mitigation and spout hygiene each appear in the search criteria but carry thinner dedicated coverage than the core dispensing and kitchen-utensil classes — worth a closer claim-by-claim read before assuming the space is open.
Explore white space in EurekaWith 44 records against a fifth-place figure of 16, the top assignee's granted claims are the first reference point for any freedom-to-operate check in this category.
Run an FTO scan in EurekaRecent-year filings will rise as the 18-month publication lag clears; re-checking the trend in six to twelve months will give a truer read on whether the 2022 peak was a high point or a new baseline.
Set a monitoring alert in EurekaThe dataset shows a clear leadership tier: the top-ranked assignee holds 44 of the 309 records in scope, well ahead of the fifth-ranked assignee at 16 and the tenth at 8. The top five assignees combined account for 126 records, or 40.8% of the field, and the top ten reach 179 records, or 57.9%. That leaves a substantial long tail of smaller filers, so leadership is concentrated but not exclusive — there is still room for new entrants to build a position around specific mechanisms rather than broad category claims.
Filings rose from 5 in 2017 to a peak of 16 in 2022, then eased to 10 by 2024, a -9% change from 2021's 11 filings. That reads as a plateau after a strong build-up rather than a genuine decline, and it should not be read as the field cooling further, because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. The 2025 and 2026 figures in any pull of this data will understate true filing activity until later applications publish.
Kitchen and cooking utensil classifications (IPC A47J) appear on 38.5% of the 309 records, the single largest technology share, followed by liquid-dispensing classifications (B67D) at 22.7%. Water treatment (C02F), refrigeration (F25D) and sterilising (A61L) each cover between 11% and 18% of records, while heater-specific classes F24H and H05B each sit around 11%. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC classes, these figures add to more than 100% and are best read as relative weight across the field rather than as mutually exclusive segments.
US20250289705A1, filed by Xiamen Filtertech Industrial Corporation and published in September 2025, claims a water dispenser with three separate dispensing channels fed from one source, each independently gated, where one channel carries a heat storage tank and hot-water flow regulator and another carries a cold-water flow regulator, both tied to shared control logic. A team designing a multi-temperature dispenser with independently controlled hot and cold paths from a common feed should review this claim scope closely before finalising a similar channel architecture. It does not, on its own, block simpler single-channel or two-temperature designs that do not share this specific control arrangement.
The search criteria for this dataset span thick film heaters, temperature accuracy, scale formation, standby energy, dispensing flow and spout hygiene, but filing density is heaviest in the broader appliance and dispensing classes (A47J, B67D) rather than in these narrower mechanisms. Standby energy reduction, scale-formation mitigation at the point of heating, and spout or dispensing-point hygiene each show up in the underlying search terms without a correspondingly large dedicated record count. That gap suggests these are worth a focused claim-by-claim review rather than an area to assume is already fully occupied.
Go past this page: query the whole water dispensers and instant heating corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.