Book a demo

Water Recycling System Patent Landscape 2026

Water Recycling System Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Water Recycling System Patent Landscape in 2026

The water recycling system patent field spans 2,601 patent families and is in a Growth stage, with the recent three-year window running well above the prior period, though annual filings peaked in 2023 and the most recent years remain undercounted due to publication lag. Activity is moderately concentrated, with Axine Water Technologies leading at 83 patent families, followed closely by Toray Industries and Water Standard, while China dominates as the primary filing jurisdiction.

2,601
Patent families in scope
19%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+16%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Axine Water Technologies leads a moderately concentrated field

Axine Water Technologies holds the top position with 83 patent families, ahead of Toray Industries (76) and Water Standard (65). The top five filers — Axine, Toray, Water Standard, Ecolab, and Degremont — collectively account for 19% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, indicating a competitive but not monopolized landscape.

The tier gap between the leader and the second rank is narrow (83 vs. 76 patent families), and a broad mid-tier of industrials, oil majors, and research universities fills positions six through twenty. This structure signals that no single applicant has achieved decisive IP dominance, and challengers remain within striking distance.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Axine Water Technologies83
2Toray Industries Inc76
3Water Standard Co LLC65
4Ecolab USA Inc46
5Degremont SA40
6Saudi Arabian Oil Co35
7Regents of the University of California33
8National University of Singapore30
9General Electric Co27
10Evolution Aqua Ltd27
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11VEOLIA WATER SOLUTIONS & TECHNOLOGIES SUPPORT SAS25
12Dow Global Technologies LLC25
13Massachusetts Institute of Technology25
14KING ABDULLAH UNIV OF SCI & TECH24
15DOOSAN HEAVY IND & CONSTR CO LTD24
16Baker Hughes Co23
17Mitsubishi Electric Corp22
18BOYING XIAMEN SCI & TECH22
19CarbonCure Technologies Inc22
20California Institute of Technology21
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The presence of multiple industrial incumbents (Toray, Ecolab, General Electric, Mitsubishi Electric), oil-sector players (Saudi Arabian Oil, Baker Hughes), and research institutions (Regents of the University of California, National University of Singapore, MIT) reflects a technically diverse competitive ecosystem where applied and fundamental research coexist.

Filing counts for 20242026 are materially understated due to patent publication lag; any apparent softening in those years should not be interpreted as a structural slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth sustained; treatment chemistry and membrane separation dominate the technology mix

The filing trend and IPC composition charts together reveal a field that has grown on a multi-year basis even as annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak, while the technology mix remains heavily anchored in water and wastewater treatment chemistry alongside membrane-based separation processes.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed from 273 families in 2017 to a peak of 346 in 2023, representing the multi-year expansion captured in a 16% recent-window growth figure. The dip to 316 in 2024 and 217 in 2025 reflects standard publication lag rather than a real contraction; the 2026 figure of 55 is a preliminary count only. Engineers should read the 2017–2023 arc as the confirmed signal.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 346 in 2023.273201724420182842019263202029220213112022346202331620242172025552026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C02F (water and wastewater treatment) is the dominant IPC class by a wide margin, followed by B01D (separation processes including filtration and membranes). The remaining classes — including E03B (water supply and distribution), B01J (chemical and physical processes), C25B (electrolytic production), and G01N (material analysis) — each hold substantially smaller shares, pointing to areas where coverage thins relative to the core treatment and separation cluster.

Technology compositionC02F · Water & wastewater treatment leads with 4,305; B01D · Separation processes (filtration etc.) 2,560.C02F · Water & wastewate…4,305B01D · Separation proces…2,560E03B · Water supply & di…299B01J · Chemical/physical…190B01F · Mixing & stirring132C25B · Electrolytic prod…120G01N · Material analysis…102E03C · Plumbing & sanita…87↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US12017940B2Published 2024-06-25

Bath water recycling system

WEAVER, Ruth

A water recycling system for reprocessing and reusing bathing water from a bath or shower. The bathing water recycling system treats and reuses water that overflows from a bathtub or shower pan. The used bathing water is captured and retained after use. The captured dirty water is then filtered and purified. The filtered and purified water can be… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Bath water recycling system — patent drawingBath water recycling system — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1New and improved system for processing various che…852
2Stabilized microporous materials and hydrogel mate…221
3Methods and systems for large scale carbon dioxide…200
4Process and system for recycling and reusing gray …198
5Aquaculture wastewater treatment system and method…165
6Production of potable water and freshwater needs f…164
7Gray-water reclamation and reuse system164
8Stabilized microporous materials162

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the structure means for R&D investment and competitive positioning

Four structural observations — life-cycle stage, concentration, collaboration patterns, and geographic spread — shape where new entrants and incumbents alike should focus attention.

Growth

Growth stage with peak-year easing

The field is classified as Growth. Recent three-year filing volume sits well above the prior three-year window, confirming ongoing expansion on a multi-year basis. Annual volume peaked in 2023 at 346 patent families and has since eased, consistent with a maturing growth trajectory rather than a post-peak decline; publication lag further understates 2024–2026 counts. R&D investment is still attracting new filers alongside incumbents.

Growth · peak 2023
Concentration

Competitive but no dominant incumbent

The top five filers hold 19% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total — moderate concentration that leaves room for challengers. The narrow gap between the leader (83 patent families) and second-ranked Toray Industries (76) means no single party holds a commanding IP position. Mid-tier players including Ecolab, Degremont, Saudi Arabian Oil, and several universities collectively exert meaningful competitive pressure across adjacent technical routes.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

BASF and National University of Singapore anchor the most active partnership

The most active co-filing pair is BASF and the National University of Singapore, with 14 joint patent families — the largest collaboration count in the evidence. Saudi Arabian Oil Co. co-filed with King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (5 families) and with Saudi Aramco Services (4 families), indicating a vertically integrated IP strategy in the oil-sector water reuse segment. BASF also filed jointly with BASF Schweiz AG (1 family). Academic-industrial partnerships are a structural feature of this space.

Industry–academia links
Geography

China leads filings; US and EPO markets are the primary validation targets

China is the dominant filing jurisdiction, followed by the United States and Europe (EPO). WIPO (PCT) filings indicate meaningful international prosecution activity. India, Japan, Australia, and Canada form a secondary tier, while South Korea, Germany, and Israel round out the top ten. The geographic spread suggests that applicants pursuing global market protection should prioritize CN, US, EP, and PCT as core routes, with India and Japan as high-value secondary markets given their water-stress context.

CN · US · EP · PCT core
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
BASF SENational University of Singapore14
Saudi Arabian Oil CoKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals5
Saudi Arabian Oil CoSaudi Aramco Services Co4
BASF SEBASF SCHWEIZ AG1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration counts reflect co-applicant patent families identified in the evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Axine and Toray lead distinct technical routes; challengers accelerate

The top two applicants occupy different technical positions — Axine in electrochemical treatment and Toray in membrane separation — while several challengers show accelerating recent momentum.

Leader · Axine Water Technologies

Axine Water Technologies

Axine Water Technologies leads the ranking with 83 patent families. Its technology emphasis is concentrated on electrochemical water and wastewater treatment (C02F 1), with additional depth in electrolytic production of compounds (C25B 9 and C25B 11), distinguishing it clearly from the membrane-focused challengers. Momentum data for Axine is not separately itemized in the applicant momentum evidence; its position at the top of the overall ranking reflects a sustained multi-year filing program.

patent families: 83
Challenger · Toray Industries

Toray Industries

Toray Industries ranks second with 76 patent families, anchoring its portfolio in membrane-based separation (B01D 61 and B01D 65) and water treatment chemistry (C02F 1) in roughly equal measure — a dual-route strategy that covers both filtration hardware and chemical treatment. Momentum data for Toray is not separately itemized in the applicant momentum evidence, but its overall rank and breadth across two major IPC clusters signal a well-established incumbent position.

patent families: 76
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Unlock rankings, momentum scores, and technology routes for all top-100 filers in water recycling systems.
Water Standard Co LLCEcolab USA Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Ecolab USA Inc12▲ new entrant
Saudi Arabian Oil Co11▼ -27%
Regents of the University of California8▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Ranking is by patent families; technology emphasis is drawn from the top three IPC subclasses per applicant.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the core treatment cluster

Several IPC branches sit at the periphery of the dominant C02F and B01D core, with low share relative to their technical relevance to water recycling. These are observations of relative sparsity; entry viability depends on each applicant’s existing capability base.

C25B · Electrolytic production of compounds

C25B (electrolytic production of compounds) holds 120 patent-record-level entries — roughly 1% of the IPC distribution — despite electrochemical oxidation and electrocoagulation being recognized treatment routes for difficult industrial effluents. Axine Water Technologies has already staked a position here (43 and 24 entries at the C25B 9 and C25B 11 subclass level respectively), but the branch remains sparse relative to C02F. Teams with electrochemistry expertise in adjacent domains such as water splitting or industrial electrolysis have a plausible entry path via adaptation of existing cell designs to water treatment applications.

Search this in Eureka →

G01N · Material analysis & testing

G01N (material analysis and testing) accounts for 102 patent-record-level entries — approximately 1% of the IPC distribution — even though real-time water quality sensing and inline analytics are prerequisite enabling technologies for closed-loop recycling systems. Kemira (Kemira Oyj) has already signaled interest here with G01N 21 subclass activity. The branch is sparse relative to its importance in smart water management, and teams with sensor, spectroscopy, or AI-assisted detection capabilities face a relatively open competitive field for novel inline water quality measurement methods integrated with recycling control loops.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete branch-by-branch sparsity analysis and applicant overlap scores for all adjacent IPC classes.
E03B · Water supply & distributionB01J · Chemical/physical processes & catalysis+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level and reflect relative sparsity within the top-100 IPC distribution.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerC02F 1 · Water & wastewater treatmentC02F 9 · Water & wastewater treatmentC02F 103 · Water & wastewater treatmentC02F 3 · Water & wastewater treatmentB01D 61 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)
Water Standard Co LLCStrong · 61Strong · 39AbsentAbsentStrong · 44
Toray Industries IncStrong · 62AbsentAbsentAbsentStrong · 62
Axine Water TechnologiesStrong · 81AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Evolution Aqua LtdStrong · 27Strong · 27AbsentStrong · 27Absent
Ecolab USA IncStrong · 44AbsentModerate · 10AbsentAbsent
General Electric CoStrong · 27Moderate · 8Moderate · 9AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map the water recycling system landscape for your own portfolio?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.