Book a demo

Water-to-Water Heat Pump Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Water-to-Water Heat Pump Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/water-to-water-heat-pumps-for-district-and-industrial-heat-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · HVAC Systems
Water-to-water heat pump patents for district and industrial heat
  • No single filer dominates. the ranked leader holds 3,235 records and the top 10 combined cover just 5.3% of all 360,220 records in scope.
  • Filing has plateaued, not grown. activity peaked in 2022 at 940 filings and the 2017–2026 trend sits flat to declining once the partial latest year is set aside.
  • Core refrigeration classes are thinly claimed. F25B (refrigeration & heat pumps) covers only 0.2% of records and F24D (domestic heating) 0.2%, well behind adjacent water-treatment and materials classes.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
360.2K
Published Records
3%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-35%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (886 records) with 2024 (580) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 360,220 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this dataset covers

The search set spans 360,220 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, built around claim language for supply temperature thresholds, cascade and two-stage cycles, compressor discharge temperature and system integration in water-based heat transfer. It captures both dedicated heat-pump filings and a large volume of adjacent water-treatment, materials and analytical patents that share the same search terms, which is why the IPC composition below is broader than a pure heat-pump taxonomy would suggest.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend line understate real activity; treat the last one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1PROCTER & GAMBLE CO3,235
  2. 2HITACHI LTD2,476
  3. 3BASF SE2,361
  4. 4FUJIFILM CORP1,997
  5. 5KK TOSHIBA1,807
  6. 6PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP1,611
  7. 7MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP1,509
  8. 8TORAY INDUSTRIES INC1,417
  9. 9CANON KK1,345
  10. 10TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK1,215
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Water-to-Water Heat Pumps for District and Industrial Heat covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 360,220-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A plateau, not a growth curve

Filings rose from 862 in 2017 to a peak of 940 in 2022, then eased back toward 34 in the still-partial 2026 count. The midpoint year matching the peak indicates the field has stopped expanding rather than accelerating into a new build-out.

A plateau, not a growth curve02505007501,000862201720182019202020219402022202320242025342026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Water treatment and materials classes outweigh core refrigeration

C02F (water & wastewater treatment) leads at 0.7% of the 360,220 records, followed by B01D separation processes at 0.6% and G01N materials testing at 0.5%. The refrigeration-specific classes — F25B heat pumps and F24H/F24D heaters — each sit at 0.2-0.3%, meaning the mechanical heat-pump cycle itself is a comparatively narrow slice of a much larger search space dominated by adjacent water and materials science.

Water treatment and materials classes outweigh core refrigerationC02F · Water & wastewater treatment2,6330.7%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…2,1840.6%G01N · Material analysis & testing1,6760.5%F24H · Fluid heaters & water heaters9070.3%A61K · Medicinal preparations8740.2%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …7790.2%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps7190.2%F24D · Domestic heating systems6370.2%Other21,3515.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 360,220 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Water-to-Water Heat Pumps for District and Industrial Heat covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Water-to-Water Heat Pumps for District and Industrial Heat with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about water-to-water heat pumps for district and industrial heat and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Filing
US6715916B22004-04-06

US6715916B2 — Gas turbine firing and combustion reference temperature correction for water content

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY

A system is disclosed for adjusting a gas turbine firing temperature control algorithm and combustion reference temperature algorithms based on exhaust gas temperature, turbine pressure ratio and compressor discharge temperature for water content in the air entering the compressor differing from the design water content of ambient air. The water content in the ambient air is calculated by the control system from measured data from a dry bulb temperature sensor and a wet bulb temperature or humidity sensor.Filed by General Electric, granted 2004-04-06 — control-layer claims on compressor discharge temperature correction rather than the heat exchanger hardware itself.

US6715916B2 — patent drawing 1US6715916B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this search set
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5760100AExtended wear ophthalmic lens1,983
2US5322063AHydrophilic polyurethane membranes for electrochemical glucose sensors1,624
3US6241928B1Method for production of shaped hydrogel of absorbent resin1,110
4US5849811AExtended wear ophthalmic lens981
5US20160045841A1New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials855
6US5965631AExtended wear ophthalmic lens828
7US5789461AMethods of forming an extended wear ophthalmic lens having a hydrophilic surface717
8US5776999AMethods of using and screening extended wear opthalmic lenses700
9US5591344AHot water disinfection of dialysis machines, including the extracorporeal circuit thereof687
10WO2005095618A2Plants with reduced activity of the starch phosphorylating enzyme phosphoglucan, water dikinase638

Citation counts favour older filings simply by virtue of time in the corpus; read them as a signal of influence on later work, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Water-to-Water Heat Pumps for District and Industrial Heat covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once volume, concentration and technology composition are read together.

Concentration
5.3% top 10
share of 360,220 records

No gatekeeper to clear

The top 10 assignees combined hold 18,973 records, only 5.3% of the full 360,220-record set, and the leader alone accounts for 3,235. That is a long tail, not a fortress: a new entrant is not fighting through one or two dominant portfolios to find open claim space.

Ranked leaders, not a top-50 or top-100 cut.
Momentum
2022 peak, 940 filings
then declining toward 34 in 2026

Filing has already crested

Year-over-year counts rise from 862 in 2017 to a peak of 940 in 2022 before falling back. Several of the more active historical filers show 0% or -100% year-over-year change in the latest year, consistent with a field that has stopped adding fresh claim volume even before accounting for publication lag.

Most recent year is partial; treat as a floor.
Technology mix
F25B at 0.2%
share of 360,220 records

Core heat-pump classes are thin

C02F water treatment (0.7%) and B01D separation (0.6%) outweigh F25B refrigeration/heat pumps and F24D domestic heating, each at 0.2%. The mechanical cycle hardware that defines a water-to-water heat pump is a narrow claim layer sitting underneath a much larger volume of water-processing and materials-testing filings that share this search vocabulary.

Class shares sum above 100%; each record can carry several IPC codes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to water-to-water heat pumps for district and industrial heat, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Water-to-Water Heat Pumps for District and Industrial Heat covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

The ranked assignee list runs 100 companies deep with no dominant blocker at the top, which changes how a freedom-to-operate review should be scoped.

Leader
3,235 records
single-assignee count

Largest portfolio, still a minority share

The top-ranked assignee holds 3,235 records out of 360,220 in scope — a meaningful lead over rank ten's 1,215, but nowhere near control of the field. Reviewing this portfolio narrows a search considerably without closing it.

Leader vs. fifth place: 3,235 vs. 1,807.
Mid-tier spread
1,807 at fifth
records held by rank 5

A gradual, not a cliff-edge, drop-off

Filings fall from 3,235 at the top to 1,807 by fifth place and 1,215 by tenth, a gradual taper rather than a sharp cliff. That shape points to a fragmented competitive set where several mid-sized portfolios are worth checking individually.

Ranking covers 100 companies total.
Geography
10,311 US filings
leading receiving office

US and EPO carry the bulk of filings

The United States receives the largest single share of filings at 10,311, ahead of the EPO at 3,702 and WIPO/PCT at 1,871, with Canada, the UK and Australia each above 1,000. Clearance work should prioritise these offices before extending to smaller jurisdictions.

Receiving-office counts, not family counts.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches where filing density is visibly lower than the surrounding claim space.
Cascade two-stage cycle control logicCompressor discharge temperature correction for variable water contentDistrict-scale supply temperature staging above conventional thresholdsDomestic-to-district integration hardware (F24D overlap)Wastewater heat recovery coupling (C02F/F25B boundary)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Procter & Gamble10%
Hitachi, Ltd.0
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)0-100%
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation0-100%
General Electric Company0
BASF SE0-100%
Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd.0
Toray Industries, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Water-to-Water Heat Pumps for District and Industrial Heat covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The landscape points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is clearance, licensing or new filing.

Scope a freedom-to-operate check

With no assignee holding more than 3,235 of 360,220 records, a workable FTO review needs to check the ranked leaders individually rather than assume one portfolio controls the space.

Run an FTO scan in Eureka

Watch for the lag correction

The 2025-2026 filing counts will revise upward as later publications land; re-check the trend before concluding the plateau is final.

Track filing trends in Eureka

Test claims against the thin classes

F25B and F24D carry the lowest class shares in this set, which is where a narrowly drafted new claim is least likely to collide with existing coverage.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Water-to-Water Heat Pumps for District and Industrial Heat covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Water-to-Water Heat Pumps for District and Industrial Heat covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Water-to-Water Heat Pumps for District and Industrial Heat in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole water-to-water heat pumps for district and industrial heat corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.