https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/wave-energy-converter-scale-up-and-mass-production-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Marine & Offshore · Patent Landscape
Wave Energy Converter Scale-Up: Who's Filing and Where the Gaps Sit
  • Filing peaked in 2021 at 21 records and has not recovered, with the 2022 midpoint already down to 17 and the latest partial year at just 5.
  • Marine-vessel and hydraulic-machine classes dominate the claim space, with B63B at 51 records and F03B at 41, while naval vessel classification B63G trails at only 10.
  • Collaborative filing is almost nonexistent, with just two co-assignee pairs identified across all 104 patent families in this corpus.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
104
Published Records
-52%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
AU
Leading Jurisdiction
6
Active Filers Ranked
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families addressing wave energy converter array deployment, serial device manufacturing, and modular converter production — the scale-up problem that sits between a working prototype and a fleet of devices installed offshore. The corpus spans 104 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, drawn from filings that combine wave-energy or ocean-wave-device language with array-, serial-, or modular-production claim language.

Coverage runs across eight IPC subclasses, from marine vessel hulls (B63B) and hydraulic machinery (F03B) through to electric generators (H02K) and onboard chemical processes such as electrolysis (C25B) and water treatment (C02F). That spread reflects how a wave energy converter scale-up claim often has to address the hull, the power take-off, and whatever process the converter is powering, all in the same filing.

Filing volume and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1Lone Gull Holdings, Ltd96
  2. 2RESOLUTE MARINE ENERGY INC5
  3. 3WILLIAMS ARTHUR R3
  4. 4TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION HUB IIT GUWAHATI1
  5. 5PONDICHERRY UNIVERSITY1
  6. 6KURMA RENEWABLE ENERGY PTE LTD1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wave Energy Converter Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Filings in this dataset run from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with volume concentrated in a narrow band of years rather than a steady climb. The technology composition spans eight IPC subclasses, reflecting how wave energy converters pull together marine hull engineering, hydraulic and electric power take-off, and downstream processes like electrolysis or water treatment.

A single peak year, not sustained growth

Filing activity rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 21 records in 2021, then flattened: the 2022 midpoint sits at 17, and the most recent partial year shows only 5. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be, but the 2021 peak followed by a flat-to-declining trend suggests filing activity has not returned to its prior high.

A single peak year, not sustained growth0613192502017201820192020212021202220232024202552026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Marine hulls and hydraulic machinery dominate the classification mix

B63B (ships and marine vessels) leads with 51 records, followed by F03B (hydraulic machines) at 41 and F04D (non-positive-displacement pumps) at 33. Electrolytic production (C25B, 31) and water treatment (C02F, 26) appear at meaningful volume, showing that a share of this corpus treats the converter as a platform for an onboard process rather than purely a power-export device. Electric motors and generators (H02K, 16) and naval/offensive vessel classifications (B63G, 10) are the thinnest categories.

Marine hulls and hydraulic machinery dominate the classification mixB63B · Ships & marine vessels5149.0%F03B · Hydraulic machines & engines4139.4%F04D · Non-positive-displacement pumps3331.7%C25B · Electrolytic production of com…3129.8%F04B · Positive-displacement pumps3129.8%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment2625.0%H02K · Electric motors & generators1615.4%B63G · Naval vessels & offensive109.6%Other21.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 104 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wave Energy Converter Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Wave Energy Converter Scale-Up and Mass Production with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about wave energy converter scale-up and mass production and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The records shaping current claim scope

Most Recent Grant
EP4061700B12026-06-03

EP4061700B1 — Self-charging autonomous submersible vessel

LONE GULL HOLDINGS, LTD

Granted to Lone Gull Holdings, Ltd on 2026-06-03, this record covers a self-charging autonomous submersible vessel, an architecture distinct from the surface and moored converter designs that dominate the rest of the corpus. It is the most recent grant identified in this dataset.Original filing title rendered in German as "Selbstaufladendes autonomes Tauchboot."

EP4061700B1 — patent drawing 1EP4061700B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20200056578A1Inertial hydrodynamic pump and wave engine107
2US20130009402A1Wave-energy converter31
3US10605226B2Inertial hydrodynamic pump and wave engine27
4US20230078347A1Inertial hydrodynamic pump and wave engine25
5WO2021102396A1Self-charging autonomous submersible vessel20
6US11118559B2Inertial hydrodynamic pump and wave engine17
7US11384727B2Inertial hydrodynamic pump and wave engine16
8US11891975B2Inertial hydrodynamic pump and wave engine15
9US11680554B2Inertial hydrodynamic pump and wave engine15
10US11635057B2Inertial hydrodynamic pump and wave engine15

Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older filings accumulate citations simply by being available longer, so treat this as a map of influence rather than a ranking of current importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wave Energy Converter Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Check

What the filing pattern signals

Reading citation counts and filing momentum together separates which mechanical routes are actually contested from which ones simply carry a lot of documents.

Citation concentration
107 cites
top-cited record

One mechanical principle draws most of the follow-on filing

US20200056578A1 leads the corpus at 107 citations, and the same inertial hydrodynamic pump and wave engine concept reappears across two further publications (US10605226B2, US20230078347A1). That repeat pattern under one lineage is a stronger signal of contested claim space than raw filing volume alone.

Citations favour older filings — treat this as historic influence, not current activity.
Filing momentum
21 → 5
peak year to latest year

Activity has cooled since the 2021 peak

Filings climbed from zero in 2017 to 21 in 2021, then fell through a 2022 midpoint of 17 down to 5 in the latest partial year. Publication lag means the final year or two always undercounts, but the multi-year decline from peak predates that effect.

Most recent year is partial; expect upward revision as later publications land.
Jurisdiction spread
AU 21, US 20
leading receiving offices

Filing is spread across several receiving offices, none dominant

Australia (21) and the United States (20) lead receiving-office counts, with Chile (17), the EPO (8), New Zealand (8) and the Philippines (6) all carrying meaningful volume. No single office accounts for a majority of filings, suggesting applicants are pursuing protection across multiple coastal jurisdictions rather than concentrating on one home market.

Receiving-office counts reflect where applications were filed, not where a device is deployed.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to wave energy converter scale-up and mass production, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Collaboration is the exception, not the rule
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
RESOLUTE MARINE ENERGY INCWILLIAMS ARTHUR R2
TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION HUB IIT GUWAHATIPONDICHERRY UNIVERSITY1

Only two co-assignee pairs appear across 104 families in this dataset — Resolute Marine Energy with Williams Arthur R, and Technology Innovation Hub IIT Guwahati with Pondicherry University. That scarcity points to a field still built on single-filer development rather than joint ventures or shared manufacturing agreements.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wave Energy Converter Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Assignees

Who is filing, and how concentrated is the field

With 104 families spread across a long list of assignees and only two co-assignee pairs identified, this is a field of single-filer development rather than one led by a handful of consolidated players. Recent-year momentum is thin across the board, with most active filers logging just one filing in the latest tracked year.

Most recent momentum
3 filings, -50% YoY
latest-year activity

Lone Gull Holdings

The only assignee still filing at more than a single-record pace in the latest year, though volume is down fifty percent from the prior year. Also holds the corpus's most recent grant, EP4061700B1, on a self-charging autonomous submersible vessel.

Latest-year filings: 3, down from the prior year.
Academic collaboration
1 filing each
latest-year activity

IIT Guwahati & Pondicherry University

One of only two co-assignee pairs in the entire dataset, this academic collaboration filed once in the latest tracked year. Its presence signals early-stage research activity rather than commercial-scale claim building.

Co-assignee pair; latest-year filings: 1.
Independent filer
1 filing
latest-year activity

Kurma Renewable Energy Pte Ltd

Filed once in the latest tracked year, consistent with the broader pattern of dispersed, single-filing entrants rather than a concentrated set of repeat applicants.

Latest-year filings: 1.
Historic anchor filer
0 in latest year
latest-year activity

Resolute Marine Energy & Williams Arthur R

The corpus's other co-assignee pair, tied to earlier filing activity rather than the current year. No filings in the latest tracked year suggest this collaboration has gone quiet, at least in this claim area.

Co-assignee pair; latest-year filings: 0.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Structural gaps in the IPC composition and in collaborative filing point to where a first claim would face the least direct prior art.
Modular electrolysis payload interconnectsFleet-level serial manufacturing licensing termsAutonomous submersible self-charging architecturesNaval/offensive-class converter hulls (B63G)Array-level treatment-system interfaces
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Lone Gull Holdings, Ltd3-50%
TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION HUB IIT GUWAHATI1
PONDICHERRY UNIVERSITY1
KURMA RENEWABLE ENERGY PTE LTD1
RESOLUTE MARINE ENERGY INC0
WILLIAMS ARTHUR R0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wave Energy Converter Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The filing and citation data point to specific follow-up questions rather than a single conclusion. These are the natural next checks for an R&D or IP team acting on this landscape.

Run freedom-to-operate on the inertial-pump lineage

The three-publication family behind US20200056578A1 carries the highest citation count in the corpus and represents the most contested mechanical claim space. Any design using an inertial hydrodynamic pump principle should be checked against this lineage specifically.

Search this family in Eureka →

Track Lone Gull Holdings' filing cadence

As the only assignee with more than single-record activity in the latest tracked year, its next filings will indicate whether the 2021 peak is being revisited or whether the field continues to cool.

Monitor this assignee in Eureka →

Scope a claim around array-level manufacturing licensing

With only two co-assignee pairs across 104 families, joint development and licensing structures for serial production are almost entirely unclaimed. This is a candidate area for an early, defensible filing.

Draft a claim search in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wave Energy Converter Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wave Energy Converter Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Wave Energy Converter Scale-Up and Mass Production in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole wave energy converter scale-up and mass production corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.