Fastest
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/wi-fi-7-and-multi-link-operation-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Wireless CommunicationsWi-Fi 7 and Multi-Link Operation Patents: Filing Trends and Who Holds the Core Claims
- Filing already peaked. 2021 recorded 93 families against a 2022 midpoint of just 23 — the drafting rush around 802.11be's core mechanisms is behind, not ahead.
- One assignee dominates recent activity. Huawei filed 7 families in the latest year even after a 50% YoY drop, while Qualcomm's filing fell to zero — momentum is concentrating, not spreading.
- Claims cluster tightly around H04W. 263 of 276 records sit in H04W, with only a thin secondary cluster in H04L — most of the surrounding IPC space is barely touched.
276
Published Records
84%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-43%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Filing growth compares 2021 (93 records) with 2024 (53) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 276 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview
What the Wi-Fi 7 patent record shows
Wi-Fi 7, standardised as 802.11be, is defined largely by multi-link operation: a station using two or more radio links at once for throughput, latency and reliability gains. The patent record tracked here spans 2015 to 2026 and covers 276 published families filed against IPC classes H04W84, H04W72 and H04L27, capturing trigger-frame design, 320 MHz channel allocation, multi-resource-unit scheduling and power-save behaviour under multi-link operation.
Filing activity rose sharply through the standard's drafting window, peaked in 2021, and has since fallen back toward pre-peak levels — a pattern consistent with core claim space being staked out early and now being defended rather than expanded. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 figures in any trend line are understated and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.
Family filings by year, 2017-2026
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wi-Fi 7 and Multi-Link Operation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data
Filing trend and technology composition
The two views below separate when the claims were written from what they cover — useful for telling a genuinely quiet branch from one that simply predates this dataset's peak filing years.
Filing trend: rapid build then pullback
Filings moved from zero in 2017 to a peak of 93 in 2021, then declined to 23 by the 2022 midpoint and to 9 in the most recent (partial) year — a shape typical of a standard whose foundational claims were filed in a concentrated window around ratification.
IPC composition: concentrated in H04W, thin elsewhere
263 of 276 records classify under H04W (wireless communication networks) and 98 also touch H04L (digital transmission) — the two overlap heavily. Everything else, from H04B to A61B, appears in single digits, marking most of the periphery as lightly claimed rather than deliberately avoided.
Shares are the percentage of the 276 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wi-Fi 7 and Multi-Link Operation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.
Go deeper on Wi-Fi 7 and Multi-Link Operation with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about wi-fi 7 and multi-link operation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaKey Patents
The most-cited filings
Representative Recent Filing
Communication method, apparatus, and system (SG11202507924QA)
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
Filed by Huawei, this application specifies how an access point's trigger frame allocates uplink resource on a primary or secondary 320 MHz channel, distinguishing allocation behaviour by whether the subcarrier count assigned is at or below 4x996 tones. It is dated 2026-01-30, placing it among the newest filings in the dataset.Claims specificity at this level of channel and subcarrier detail is exactly where later entrants tend to get boxed into narrow design-arounds.
View full filingCitation leaders in the corpus
| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20210084711A1 | Multi-link operation for a single radio multi-link device | 90 |
| 2 | US20220030572A1 | Enhanced trigger frame | 35 |
| 3 | EP3654703A1 | Method and apparatus for link enablement and disablement during multi-link operation in a wireless network | 23 |
| 4 | US20230071851A1 | Multi-link group addressed traffic transmission method and apparatus | 20 |
| 5 | US20220053465A1 | Device and method for non-contiguous multiple resource unit in a wireless network | 16 |
| 6 | US20210409958A1 | Access points (AP) multi-link device (MLD) configured for multi-link operation (MLO) | 15 |
| 7 | WO2022108838A1 | Access point (AP) multi-link device (AP MLD) for signalling non-simultaneous transmit receive (NSTR) capabili… | 14 |
| 8 | WO2022146635A1 | QOS traffic stream setup with stream classification service (SCS) request/response | 11 |
| 9 | US20230328718A1 | Method for indicating spatial reuse parameter and determining spatial reuse parameter field and apparatus | 10 |
| 10 | WO2022020682A1 | Enhanced trigger frame | 9 |
Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings that have simply had more time to accumulate citations — treat them as a signal of influence on subsequent drafting, not of current commercial weight.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wi-Fi 7 and Multi-Link Operation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Where to run it
For builders
MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Insights
What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns in this dataset matter more to a filing strategy than the raw family count.
Filing Momentum
93 → 23 → 9
families, 2021 peak → 2022 midpoint → latest year
The drafting rush has passed
Peak filing in 2021 followed by a steep decline through the 2022 midpoint to single digits in the latest year indicates the core mechanisms of multi-link operation were claimed early. New filings now are more likely refinements or defensive continuations than foundational claims.
Read the 2025-2026 tail as understated, not as a genuine drop-off, given the 18-month publication lag.
Technology Concentration
263 of 276
records classified under H04W
Claim space is narrow, not broad
The near-total concentration in H04W, with a secondary overlap into H04L and only single-digit counts everywhere else, means the periphery — power management circuitry, broadcast coexistence, multiplex signalling — has barely been claimed against this search string.
Thin IPC counts here reflect low claim density, not necessarily low technical relevance.
Assignee Concentration
7 families, -50% YoY
Huawei's latest-year filing versus prior year
Activity is consolidating around fewer filers
Even the most active assignee in the latest year filed at half its prior rate, while several other major filers dropped to zero. A small set of co-assignee pairings, such as the Huawei-Nokia link appearing three times, suggests some claim territory is now being negotiated jointly rather than contested.
A shrinking filer pool can mean either market consolidation or that remaining claim space no longer justifies broad filing.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to wi-fi 7 and multi-link operation, with the prior art for and against each one.
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wi-Fi 7 and Multi-Link Operation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing
Assignee landscape and where the claim gates sit
Filing activity is led by a handful of infrastructure and chipset vendors, with momentum now concentrated rather than distributed across the field.
Leading Filer
7 families
latest-year filings, -50% YoY
Huawei
Huawei remains the most active filer in the latest year despite a steep year-on-year decline, and appears in the dataset's strongest co-assignee pairing alongside Nokia — three shared families suggest coordinated or cross-licensed claim territory around multi-link mechanisms.
Its representative recent filing (SG11202507924QA) targets 320 MHz trigger-frame allocation specifically.
Chipset Vendors
0 in latest year
Qualcomm and Intel filing activity
Qualcomm and Intel have gone quiet
Qualcomm's filing fell 100% year-on-year to zero, and Intel shows no latest-year filings either. Given the 18-month publication lag, this may partly reflect filings not yet published rather than a genuine halt in R&D.
Historical citation leadership (e.g. the enhanced trigger frame filing) still traces back to this group.
Infrastructure & Handset OEMs
1 family each
Samsung and Nokia, latest year
Samsung and Nokia hold steady, low-volume positions
Both filed a single family in the latest year, positioning them as continuing but not accelerating contributors. Nokia's co-filing pattern with Huawei suggests some standard-essential claim coordination rather than independent staking.
Low volume here does not imply weak claims — several highly cited records in this corpus originate from this tier of filer.
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 7 | -50% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 1 | — |
| Nokia Technologies Oy | 1 | — |
| Qualcomm Incorporated | 0 | -100% |
| Intel Corporation | 0 | — |
| LG Electronics Inc. | 0 | — |
| Avago Technologies (Broadcom) | 0 | -100% |
| Apple Inc. | 0 | -100% |
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wi-Fi 7 and Multi-Link Operation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white space identification, or monitoring.
Check freedom-to-operate against the H04W core
With 263 of 276 records in H04W and citation leaders like US20210084711A1 covering single-radio multi-link devices, any product implementing basic multi-link switching should be checked against this cluster first.
Run a claims analysis in EurekaProbe the under-claimed periphery
Power-save behaviour under non-contiguous multi-resource-unit allocation and 6 GHz coexistence signalling both appear only thinly in this corpus relative to the core H04W claims.
Explore white space in EurekaTrack the consolidating filer base
With several major chipset vendors at zero latest-year filings and Huawei still active but declining, a monitoring watch on newly published families will clarify whether this is a real slowdown or a publication-lag artifact.
Set up assignee tracking in EurekaSource: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wi-Fi 7 and Multi-Link Operation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ
Common questions on Wi-Fi 7 patents
This dataset identifies 276 published patent families filed against IPC classes tied to wireless communication networks (H04W), digital transmission (H04L) and general transmission (H04B), searched specifically for Wi-Fi 7, 802.11be and multi-link operation terminology alongside technical terms like 320 MHz channel and multi-resource unit. The true figure worldwide is higher once families outside this specific search construction are included. Family counts, rather than raw document counts, are the fairer measure since they neutralise duplicate continuation and multi-jurisdiction filings for the same invention.
Huawei is the most active recent filer, with 7 families in the latest year even after a 50% year-on-year decline, and it also appears in the dataset's strongest co-assignee pairing with Nokia. Historically, the most-cited record in the corpus is a Huawei filing on multi-link operation for single-radio multi-link devices, cited 90 times within this dataset. Qualcomm and Intel show strong historical citation presence but no filings in the latest year, which given publication lag may understate their current activity rather than indicate withdrawal.
No — filing peaked in 2021 at 93 families and had fallen to 23 by the 2022 midpoint, continuing down to single digits in the most recent year. This pattern is typical of a technology whose foundational claims were filed in a concentrated window around standard ratification. The recent-year figures should still be read cautiously, since publication lags filing by roughly 18 months and the latest year in any patent trend is always undercounted.
Multi-link operation, the defining mechanism of 802.11be, covers a station using two or more wireless links concurrently for improved throughput, latency and reliability. Within this dataset the claims cluster around trigger-frame design for resource allocation, 320 MHz channel handling including primary and secondary channel designation, non-contiguous multi-resource-unit scheduling, and power-save behaviour across multiple simultaneous links. The representative recent filing SG11202507924QA illustrates this at a granular level, specifying trigger-frame behaviour that differs based on subcarrier count relative to a 4x996-tone threshold.
The IPC composition is heavily concentrated in H04W, with only single-digit record counts in adjacent classes such as H04B, H02J, H04H and H04J, suggesting the periphery around power supply integration, broadcast coexistence and multiplex signalling is thinly claimed relative to the core. Non-contiguous multi-resource-unit power save and 6 GHz coexistence signalling stand out as technically specific sub-areas with limited direct coverage in this corpus. Thin coverage is not proof of open space — it may reflect claims filed outside this exact search construction — but it is a reasonable starting point for a freedom-to-operate scan.
Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wi-Fi 7 and Multi-Link Operation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Research Wi-Fi 7 and Multi-Link Operation in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole wi-fi 7 and multi-link operation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.