Book a demo

Wind-Assist Ship Hull Design Patent Snapshot 2026

Wind-Assist Ship Hull Design Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
Wind-Assist Ship Hull Design Patent Snapshot in 2026

The patent corpus for wind-assist ship hull design is extremely small and entirely concentrated in a single independent inventor filing exclusively in the United States. Activity peaked in 2020 and 2022 with no evidence of entry by major shipbuilders or propulsion OEMs, leaving the field structurally open.

4
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

One filer holds every patent family in scope

HIGGINSON TIMOTHY B is the sole ranked applicant, accounting for all 4 patent families in the corpus. The top five filers’ share of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total is 100%, reflecting complete concentration in a single individual rather than an institutional or corporate R&D program.

There is no discernible tier gap between a leader and a challenger because no challenger exists. All documented IP activity originates from one source, which is an unusual structural condition even for an early-stage niche.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1HIGGINSON TIMOTHY B4
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The absence of corporate or institutional applicants suggests that major shipbuilders, classification societies, and propulsion OEMs have not yet engaged in formal IP protection for this specific design intersection, despite broader industry interest in wind-assisted propulsion.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are subject to publication lag and may be under-represented; the apparent absence of 20232026 activity should not be read as confirmed inactivity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Sporadic filing bursts and a consistent AI-marine technology pairing

The annual trend and IPC composition together reveal both the pace and the technical framing of wind-assist ship hull IP: activity is episodic, and every family simultaneously invokes marine vessel design, marine propulsion, and AI-based computing.

Annual filing trend

Families were filed in two discrete bursts — 2020 and 2022 — with zero activity in all other years of the window. The field has plateaued near its modest peak; the multi-year growth rate is flat at zero percent. Publication lag means 2024–2026 should be treated as potentially incomplete, but the pattern to date is episodic rather than sustained.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2 in 2020.02017020180201922020020212202202023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

All 4 patent records fall under three IPC classes simultaneously: B63B (ships and marine vessels), B63H (marine propulsion and steering), and G06N (computing based on AI models). The uniform co-occurrence of all three classes across every family indicates that the filer’s design approach integrates AI-driven control directly into the hull-propulsion system rather than treating them as separate inventions.

Technology compositionB63B · Ships & marine vessels leads with 4; B63H · Marine propulsion & steering 4.B63B · Ships & marine ve…4B63H · Marine propulsion…4G06N · Computing based o…4↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20200262530A1Published 2020-08-20

Wind-propelled boat having parallel self-righting …

HIGGINSON, Timothy B.

A wind-propelled vessel is described herein. The vessel includes at least one hull and at least one set of paired masts. Each paired mast of the at least one set of paired masts has a first mast located to one side of the vessel and a second mast located on the opposite side of the vessel. Also, each mast of the at least one set of paired masts has a spar… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Wind-propelled boat having parallel self-righting … — patent drawingWind-propelled boat having parallel self-righting … — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Wind-propelled boat having parallel self-righting …2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · HIGGINSON TIMOTHY B

HIGGINSON TIMOTHY B

HIGGINSON TIMOTHY B holds all 4 patent families in scope and is classified as a new entrant, with 2 families in the recent period. Every family spans B63B (ships and marine vessels), B63H (marine propulsion and steering), and G06N (AI-based computing), indicating a design philosophy that couples hull aerodynamics with intelligent propulsion control. There is no trajectory data for a prior cohort to compare against, consistent with new-entrant status.

families: 4
Challenger · evidence pending

No ranked challenger identified

No second applicant appears in the ranking. The challenger position is structurally vacant. Any corporate or institutional filer entering this space would immediately become the second-largest right holder in the corpus by virtue of filing a single family.

families: 0
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
HIGGINSON TIMOTHY Bevidence pending+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own wind-assist marine IP Snapshot?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.