Book a demo

Wind Energy Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Wind Energy Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/wind-energy-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Wind Energy
Wind Energy Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Is Heading
  • 36.3% concentration. The top 5 ranked assignees account for 15,371 of the 42,295 records in scope — a small group holding over a third of the field.
  • Filings down 47% since the peak. Annual filings fell from 1,420 in 2021 to 754 in 2024, the last year publication lag lets us call complete.
  • Wind motors dominate the classification map. F03D (wind motors) touches 37.9% of all records; every other IPC subclass sits in single digits, pointing to concentration around core turbine mechanics.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
42.3K
Published Records
36%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-47%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1,420 records) with 2024 (754) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 42,295 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the wind energy patent record shows

The dataset covers 42,295 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, spanning onshore and fixed-bottom offshore wind, blade and drivetrain design, power electronics, resource assessment and turbine recycling. Filing activity climbed through the late 2010s, peaked in 2021 at 1,420 filings, and has since declined to 754 by 2024 — the last year not distorted by the roughly 18-month gap between filing and publication. Family-level counting is used throughout so that multi-jurisdiction filing by the largest players does not inflate the picture.

Classification data confirms that core turbine mechanics, captured under IPC subclass F03D, remain the field's centre of gravity, while composite blade manufacturing (B29C, B29D, B29L) forms a distinct secondary cluster. Receiving-office data shows the United States and the European Patent Office as the two largest filing venues, with WIPO's PCT route a significant third channel for applicants seeking multi-jurisdiction cover.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS8,589
  2. 2SIEMENS GAMESA RENEWABLE ENERGY AS2,189
  3. 3LM WIND POWER AS2,029
  4. 4GENERAL ELECTRIC CO1,436
  5. 5MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND LTD1,128
  6. 6LM WP PATENT HLDG AS939
  7. 7GENERAL ELECTRIC RENOVABLES ESPANA SL900
  8. 8SIEMENS AG773
  9. 9GAMESA INNOVATION & TECH SL744
  10. 10GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECH LLC605
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wind Energy Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

Annual filing counts and IPC subclass distribution across the 42,295 records in scope, drawn directly from the underlying search.

Filings rose to a 2021 peak, then eased

Filings grew from 950 in 2017 to a peak of 1,420 in 2021, then fell to 754 by 2024 — a 47% decline over that three-year span. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as provisional; publication lag means the most recent years always understate true filing activity.

Filings rose to a 2021 peak, then eased03757501,1251,50095020172018201920201,42020212022202320242025242026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Wind motors dominate; composite blade work forms a secondary cluster

F03D (wind motors) appears on 37.9% of all 42,295 records, far ahead of any other subclass. Plastics-shaping and specific plastic article classes (B29C, B29D, B29L) together mark a composite-blade manufacturing cluster, while control electronics (H02P) and turbine hardware (F01D, B66C, B32B) each sit at 1-2% of records — since records can carry multiple classes, these shares are not mutually exclusive and add to more than 100%.

Wind motors dominate; composite blade work forms a secondary clusterF03D · Wind motors (wind turbines)16,03937.9%B29C · Shaping of plastics2,6406.2%B29D · Specific plastic articles1,1822.8%B29L · Plastic products (index)1,0622.5%B66C · Cranes & hoists6261.5%F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines5301.3%H02P · Control of motors & generators5291.3%B32B · Layered products & laminates4521.1%Other9,70322.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 42,295 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wind Energy Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Wind Energy Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about wind energy patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative Record
US20200291919A12020-09-17

Vertical axis turbine blade, turbine and wind power generation device (US20200291919A1)

LOH

The filing claims a vertical axis wind turbine blade whose outer profile follows a NACA four-digit symmetrical airfoil section with a first opening, and whose inner profile curves inward to form a wind scoop; the full turbine assembly pairs at least two such blades on uniform axes around paired rotor shafts.Filed by LOH; published 2020-09-17. Abstract condensed from the original filing.

US20200291919A1 — patent drawing 1US20200291919A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20100017045A1Electrical demand response using energy storage in vehicles and buildings642
2US6327994B1Scavenger energy converter system its new applications and its control systems421
3US20030168864A1Offshore wind turbine410
4US4976587AComposite wind turbine rotor blade and method for making same353
5US4565929AWind powered system for generating electricity337
6US20060033674A1Multi-function field-deployable resource harnessing apparatus and methods of manufacture328
7US6320272B1Wind turbine with a wind velocity measurement system309
8US6566764B2Variable speed wind turbine having a matrix converter299
9US7075189B2Offshore wind turbine with multiple wind rotors and floating system282
10US5907192AMethod and system for wind turbine braking277

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence rather than of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wind Energy Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern means for strategy

Three signals in the data matter more for planning than the raw counts: where filings concentrate, how citation influence skews, and what the venue split implies about where enforcement actually matters.

Concentration
36.3% / top 5
share of 42,295 records

A small group holds over a third of the field

The top 5 ranked assignees account for 15,371 of the 42,295 records in scope, and the top 10 reach 45.7%. That level of concentration means claim space around core turbine mechanics is heavily occupied by a handful of established manufacturers rather than open to easy entry.

Source: assignee ranking, 100 companies
Technology mix
37.9% F03D
share of all records

Wind motor mechanics still anchor the field

F03D alone touches more than a third of records, dwarfing composite manufacturing, control electronics and structural hardware classes. Filing density this high signals occupied claim space in core turbine mechanics, not that the underlying mechanical problems are solved.

Source: IPC subclass distribution
Filing momentum
-47% 2021→2024
annual filings

Post-peak decline, not a stalled field

Annual filings dropped from 1,420 at the 2021 peak to 754 in 2024. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and 2026 counts are still filling in and should not be read as confirmation the decline is continuing.

Source: filing trend, 2017-2024
Venue split
US 7,087 / EPO 6,819
receiving-office filings

US and Europe lead; PCT is a strong third channel

The United States and the European Patent Office each receive close to 7,000 filings, with WIPO's PCT route at 3,631 as the main path for applicants seeking broad multi-jurisdiction cover before national phase entry.

Source: receiving-office counts
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to wind energy patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wind Energy Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

A concentrated set of turbine OEMs and their subsidiaries hold the majority share of ranked filings, with recent-year momentum data showing even the largest filers pulling back sharply from their historical filing pace.

Leader
8,589 records
leading assignee

One filer holds a clear lead

The top-ranked assignee's family count sits well ahead of second place, reflecting decades of continuous turbine platform development rather than a single filing surge.

Source: assignee ranking
Mid-field
1,128 records
fifth-place assignee

A sharp drop-off after the leader

Filing counts fall steeply from the leader to fifth place, and again by tenth place at 605 records, indicating a field led by a handful of major OEMs above a longer tail of single- and low-volume filers.

Source: assignee ranking
Momentum
-92% to -99% YoY
largest filers, latest year

Even leading filers show sharp recent-year pullback

Several of the largest historical filers show latest-year counts of 0 or 1 record, with year-on-year drops in the -92% to -99% range. This pattern is consistent with publication lag rather than a genuine collapse in R&D activity, but it means recent-year rankings should be read cautiously.

Source: recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a first-mover claim
Sub-areas with comparatively thin coverage relative to the core turbine mechanics cluster
Turbine blade end-of-life recyclingSmall wind turbine control electronicsOffshore floating foundation integrationWind resource assessment sensor fusionDrivetrain condition monitoring
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Vestas Wind Systems A/S1-99%
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy A/S1-92%
LM Wind Power A/S1-94%
General Electric Company0
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.0
LM WP Patent Holding A/S0
Siemens AG0
Gamesa Innovation & Technology, S.L.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wind Energy Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature core and a thinner set of adjacent branches. The next step is usually to test a specific claim idea or a specific competitor against the full record set rather than the summary view.

Test a claim against prior art

Run a candidate claim for a blade recycling method or a drivetrain monitoring approach against the full corpus before drafting, rather than against this summary alone.

Open Eureka

Track a specific competitor's filing pace

Recent-year momentum figures here are skewed by publication lag; a live monitor on a specific assignee gives a more current read than a fixed dataset cut.

Open Eureka

Map the white space in detail

The under-claimed branches flagged here are starting points, not conclusions — a full subclass-level breakdown will show exactly how thin coverage is in each one.

Open Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wind Energy Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on the wind energy patent landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wind Energy Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Wind Energy Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole wind energy patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.