Wind Energy Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
- 36.3% concentration. The top 5 ranked assignees account for 15,371 of the 42,295 records in scope — a small group holding over a third of the field.
- Filings down 47% since the peak. Annual filings fell from 1,420 in 2021 to 754 in 2024, the last year publication lag lets us call complete.
- Wind motors dominate the classification map. F03D (wind motors) touches 37.9% of all records; every other IPC subclass sits in single digits, pointing to concentration around core turbine mechanics.
Filing growth compares 2021 (1,420 records) with 2024 (754) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 42,295 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What the wind energy patent record shows
The dataset covers 42,295 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, spanning onshore and fixed-bottom offshore wind, blade and drivetrain design, power electronics, resource assessment and turbine recycling. Filing activity climbed through the late 2010s, peaked in 2021 at 1,420 filings, and has since declined to 754 by 2024 — the last year not distorted by the roughly 18-month gap between filing and publication. Family-level counting is used throughout so that multi-jurisdiction filing by the largest players does not inflate the picture.
Classification data confirms that core turbine mechanics, captured under IPC subclass F03D, remain the field's centre of gravity, while composite blade manufacturing (B29C, B29D, B29L) forms a distinct secondary cluster. Receiving-office data shows the United States and the European Patent Office as the two largest filing venues, with WIPO's PCT route a significant third channel for applicants seeking multi-jurisdiction cover.
Filing trends and technology composition
Annual filing counts and IPC subclass distribution across the 42,295 records in scope, drawn directly from the underlying search.
Filings rose to a 2021 peak, then eased
Filings grew from 950 in 2017 to a peak of 1,420 in 2021, then fell to 754 by 2024 — a 47% decline over that three-year span. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as provisional; publication lag means the most recent years always understate true filing activity.
Wind motors dominate; composite blade work forms a secondary cluster
F03D (wind motors) appears on 37.9% of all 42,295 records, far ahead of any other subclass. Plastics-shaping and specific plastic article classes (B29C, B29D, B29L) together mark a composite-blade manufacturing cluster, while control electronics (H02P) and turbine hardware (F01D, B66C, B32B) each sit at 1-2% of records — since records can carry multiple classes, these shares are not mutually exclusive and add to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 42,295 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Wind Energy Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about wind energy patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative filing and most-cited prior art
Vertical axis turbine blade, turbine and wind power generation device (US20200291919A1)
The filing claims a vertical axis wind turbine blade whose outer profile follows a NACA four-digit symmetrical airfoil section with a first opening, and whose inner profile curves inward to form a wind scoop; the full turbine assembly pairs at least two such blades on uniform axes around paired rotor shafts.Filed by LOH; published 2020-09-17. Abstract condensed from the original filing.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20100017045A1 | Electrical demand response using energy storage in vehicles and buildings | 642 |
| 2 | US6327994B1 | Scavenger energy converter system its new applications and its control systems | 421 |
| 3 | US20030168864A1 | Offshore wind turbine | 410 |
| 4 | US4976587A | Composite wind turbine rotor blade and method for making same | 353 |
| 5 | US4565929A | Wind powered system for generating electricity | 337 |
| 6 | US20060033674A1 | Multi-function field-deployable resource harnessing apparatus and methods of manufacture | 328 |
| 7 | US6320272B1 | Wind turbine with a wind velocity measurement system | 309 |
| 8 | US6566764B2 | Variable speed wind turbine having a matrix converter | 299 |
| 9 | US7075189B2 | Offshore wind turbine with multiple wind rotors and floating system | 282 |
| 10 | US5907192A | Method and system for wind turbine braking | 277 |
Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence rather than of current technical importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern means for strategy
Three signals in the data matter more for planning than the raw counts: where filings concentrate, how citation influence skews, and what the venue split implies about where enforcement actually matters.
A small group holds over a third of the field
The top 5 ranked assignees account for 15,371 of the 42,295 records in scope, and the top 10 reach 45.7%. That level of concentration means claim space around core turbine mechanics is heavily occupied by a handful of established manufacturers rather than open to easy entry.
Wind motor mechanics still anchor the field
F03D alone touches more than a third of records, dwarfing composite manufacturing, control electronics and structural hardware classes. Filing density this high signals occupied claim space in core turbine mechanics, not that the underlying mechanical problems are solved.
Post-peak decline, not a stalled field
Annual filings dropped from 1,420 at the 2021 peak to 754 in 2024. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and 2026 counts are still filling in and should not be read as confirmation the decline is continuing.
US and Europe lead; PCT is a strong third channel
The United States and the European Patent Office each receive close to 7,000 filings, with WIPO's PCT route at 3,631 as the main path for applicants seeking broad multi-jurisdiction cover before national phase entry.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to wind energy patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gate sits
A concentrated set of turbine OEMs and their subsidiaries hold the majority share of ranked filings, with recent-year momentum data showing even the largest filers pulling back sharply from their historical filing pace.
One filer holds a clear lead
The top-ranked assignee's family count sits well ahead of second place, reflecting decades of continuous turbine platform development rather than a single filing surge.
A sharp drop-off after the leader
Filing counts fall steeply from the leader to fifth place, and again by tenth place at 605 records, indicating a field led by a handful of major OEMs above a longer tail of single- and low-volume filers.
Even leading filers show sharp recent-year pullback
Several of the largest historical filers show latest-year counts of 0 or 1 record, with year-on-year drops in the -92% to -99% range. This pattern is consistent with publication lag rather than a genuine collapse in R&D activity, but it means recent-year rankings should be read cautiously.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Vestas Wind Systems A/S | 1 | -99% |
| Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy A/S | 1 | -92% |
| LM Wind Power A/S | 1 | -94% |
| General Electric Company | 0 | — |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| LM WP Patent Holding A/S | 0 | — |
| Siemens AG | 0 | — |
| Gamesa Innovation & Technology, S.L. | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a mature core and a thinner set of adjacent branches. The next step is usually to test a specific claim idea or a specific competitor against the full record set rather than the summary view.
Test a claim against prior art
Run a candidate claim for a blade recycling method or a drivetrain monitoring approach against the full corpus before drafting, rather than against this summary alone.
Open EurekaTrack a specific competitor's filing pace
Recent-year momentum figures here are skewed by publication lag; a live monitor on a specific assignee gives a more current read than a fixed dataset cut.
Open EurekaMap the white space in detail
The under-claimed branches flagged here are starting points, not conclusions — a full subclass-level breakdown will show exactly how thin coverage is in each one.
Open EurekaCommon questions on the wind energy patent landscape
The ranked assignee data shows a clear leader with 8,589 records, well ahead of the field, and the top 5 assignees combined account for 15,371 of the 42,295 records in scope — 36.3% of the total. This concentration reflects decades of continuous turbine platform development by a small number of established manufacturers and their corporate subsidiaries, rather than a recent filing surge. Anyone entering this space should expect dense prior art around core turbine mechanics from these leaders specifically.
Filings peaked in 2021 at 1,420 and fell to 754 by 2024, a 47% decline over that span, but this should not be read as a field in decline. Publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete and will rise as more records publish. The more defensible read is that filing activity has eased from its 2021 peak while the underlying R&D pace remains uncertain until later years fully publish.
IPC subclass F03D, covering wind motors and turbines generally, appears on 37.9% of all 42,295 records and is by far the largest single category. Composite blade manufacturing, spanning plastics-shaping classes B29C, B29D and B29L, forms a smaller but distinct secondary cluster. Control electronics, turbine hardware and structural lamination classes each sit at only 1-2% of records, suggesting these are comparatively thin relative to core mechanical turbine design.
Relative to the dense coverage around core wind motor mechanics and composite blade shaping, branches like turbine blade end-of-life recycling, small wind turbine control electronics and drivetrain condition monitoring show comparatively thin representation in the classification data. These are not guaranteed open ground — a full claim search is needed before relying on any gap — but they are reasonable starting points for a novelty search given how concentrated the rest of the field is. Offshore floating foundation integration is another area worth checking directly given how fixed-bottom offshore wind already carries substantial prior art.
The United States leads with 7,087 filings, closely followed by the European Patent Office at 6,819, with WIPO's PCT route third at 3,631 as the main channel for applicants seeking multi-jurisdiction cover before national phase entry. Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia each receive several hundred filings, well behind the top three. This distribution reflects where the largest turbine manufacturers seek enforceable protection rather than where turbines are physically deployed.
Research Wind Energy Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole wind energy patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.