Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Wind turbine blade inspection and repair sits at the intersection of structural monitoring, robotics and materials repair. The search here pulls records that combine blade-specific claims — drone inspection, leading-edge protection, lightning damage, structural health monitoring, in-situ repair — with the wind-motor IPC class F03D and related testing and optical classes. That combination returns a modest 15 published families, which tells you this is still a narrow, specialist filing area rather than a saturated one.
Filings so far show no single dominant year: the tracked peak is early, in 2019, and the trend line dips to nothing at the midpoint before picking back up toward the data cutoff. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent years understate real filing activity — 2026's single record is very likely an undercount of what has actually been filed.
Two views of the same 15-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across IPC subclasses.
The count goes from zero in 2017 to a tracked peak of 5 in 2019, falls back to zero at the 2022 midpoint, and is picking up again toward 2026. That U-shape is a small-N pattern — a handful of filers entering and pausing — rather than a smooth technology adoption curve.
All 15 records touch F03D (wind motors), confirming this is a blade-and-turbine-structure-first field. Robotics (B25J, 3 records), structural testing (G01M, 1) and control systems (G05B, 1) appear only as secondary classifications, meaning most claims are still written around the blade hardware itself rather than the inspection or repair equipment around it.
Shares are the percentage of the 15 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about wind turbine blade inspection and repair and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaFiled by GE Vernova Infrastructure Technology, this filing claims a method for repairing a metal mesh in a wind turbine blade damaged by a lightning strike: exposing the damaged first metal mesh, adhesively attaching a second metal mesh over it with a conductive adhesive so the two overlap, then covering the repair. It also claims the resulting blade part.Published 2025-09-18 — one of the newest records in the dataset, and the field's most current statement of lightning-damage repair claims.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2016079535A1 | Method and apparatus for turbine blade repair | 14 |
| 2 | US20200158091A1 | System and method for wind blade inspection, repair and upgrade | 10 |
| 3 | EP3653874A1 | System and method for wind blade inspection, repair and upgrade | 2 |
| 4 | US20200158094A1 | System and method for wind blade inspection, repair and upgrade | 2 |
| 5 | WO2023208821A1 | Wind turbine blade repair | 1 |
| 6 | EP3653875A1 | System and method for wind blade inspection, repair and upgrade | 1 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to be cited — read this as a map of influence within the corpus, not a ranking of current best practice.
Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (6 of 6 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Read against the trend and the IPC split, three things stand out about how this space is actually being claimed.
Fifteen families across roughly a decade is a small corpus. It means claim space around specific repair methods — like the metal-mesh overlap approach in the representative filing — is still open to a well-drafted application, rather than blocked by dense prior art.
The United States and the European Patent Office each receive roughly a third of filings, with PCT applications adding international reach and a single Spain-only filing pointing to a regional player protecting a home market first.
Every record touches the wind-motor class, but only 3 also touch manipulator/robot claims (B25J) and just 1 each touches structural testing (G01M) and control systems (G05B). Inspection hardware and autonomous repair tooling are claimed far less than the blade structures themselves.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to wind turbine blade inspection and repair, with the prior art for and against each one.
No assignee in this dataset files repeatedly at volume. The clearest recent-year signal belongs to a structural-monitoring specialist, while the larger turbine OEMs in the set show no filings in the latest tracked year.
Among the tracked assignees, STME is the sole entity with a filing in the most recent year, while the larger OEM names in the dataset — GE, LM Wind Power, GE Renewable Energy Spain — show zero filings in that same window.
GE, LM Wind Power and GE Renewable Energy Spain each appear in the assignee set but with no activity in the latest tracked year — consistent with them holding foundational claims (like the representative lightning-repair filing) rather than actively expanding them right now.
With only 15 families spread across several assignees and no repeat high-volume filer, this is a long-tail field: entry is realistic, but no single company's portfolio can be treated as the field's baseline the way a dominant player's would in a denser art.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| STME - SISTEMAS DE MONITORIZAÇÃO DE ESTRUTURAS UNIPESSOAL LDA | 1 | — |
| General Electric Company (GE) | 0 | — |
| LM Wind Power | 0 | — |
| GE Renewable Energy Spain, S.L. | 0 | — |
| TRAC ENG | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a field still forming its claim boundaries. Two directions make sense depending on whether you are filing or defending.
Robotics, structural testing and control-system claims are thin relative to the F03D core. A first-filer with a specific, well-instrumented repair or inspection method in one of those adjacent classes has real room to establish a position.
Explore white space in EurekaGE, LM Wind Power and GE Renewable Energy Spain hold foundational filings but show no recent-year activity in this set — worth monitoring for whether that changes once 2025-2026 filings finish publishing.
Set up assignee tracking in EurekaThis dataset tracks 15 published patent families matching drone inspection, leading-edge protection, lightning damage, structural health monitoring and in-situ repair claims combined with wind-motor and testing IPC classes. That is a small corpus for a decade of coverage, which means the field is still forming rather than saturated. Broader searches using different keyword combinations may surface additional adjacent filings not captured by this specific query.
The dataset includes GE, LM Wind Power and GE Renewable Energy Spain among the assignees, alongside smaller specialists such as STME, a structural-monitoring company. No single assignee dominates by volume here; the field reads as a long tail with GE-affiliated entities holding some of the more cited foundational filings, including the lightning-strike repair method in US20250290491A1.
Every record in this dataset carries the F03D classification for wind motors and turbines, since blade structure claims are the anchor of the field. Robotics claims fall under B25J, structural testing under G01M, and control-system claims under G05B — but each of those secondary classes appears in only one to three of the 15 records, showing that most patenting still centres on the blade hardware itself rather than the equipment used to inspect or repair it.
The filing trend is a U-shape rather than a steady climb: a tracked peak of 5 filings in 2019, a drop to zero at the 2022 midpoint, and renewed activity heading toward 2026. Because patent publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, the apparent slowdown in recent years is likely an artefact of that lag rather than a real pause, and the 2026 figure in particular should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.
The clearest gaps sit in the classes adjacent to the F03D core: autonomous drone flight planning for blade scanning, robotic end-effectors for in-situ repair, and sensor placement strategies for structural health monitoring all have only a handful of claims across the whole dataset. A first claim drafted specifically around one of these methods — rather than around the blade structure generally — has more room to stand without colliding with existing art.
Go past this page: query the whole wind turbine blade inspection and repair corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.