Book a demo

WAAM Durability Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

WAAM Durability Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/wire-arc-additive-manufacturing-environmental-durability-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Additive Manufacturing
Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Environmental Durability Patents
  • Filing only started accelerating in 2025. Thirteen of the dataset's records land in that single year, after a flat stretch through 2022 — this is an emerging cluster, not a settled one.
  • India's receiving office leads the United States more than two to one. 14 filings route through India against 6 through the US, which is unusual for a welding-adjacent metals technology and worth checking before assuming US or EPO coverage is sufficient.
  • Aluminium, magnesium and titanium alloy routes carry the citation weight. The most-cited records in the set are alloy-specific WAAM durability methods, not generic process claims — that is where freedom-to-operate diligence should start.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
23
Published Records
52%
Top-5 Share of All Records
IN
Leading Jurisdiction
26
Active Filers Ranked

Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 23 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families at the intersection of wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) and environmental durability outcomes — corrosion resistance, oxidation resistance, service durability and as-deposited durability — filtered to IPC classes covering arc welding processes, corrosion protection and powder-based additive routes. It is a narrow, claim-title-and-abstract search rather than a broad WAAM survey, so the 23 families here represent the subset of WAAM filings that explicitly claim or describe a durability or corrosion outcome, not WAAM process patents generally.

Coverage runs from 2015-01-01 to the 2026-07-31 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in the trend chart understate actual filing activity for those years.

Filing activity, 2015–2026
  1. 1NORTHEASTERN UNIV CHINA4
  2. 2DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY3
  3. 3GOODRICH CORP2
  4. 4CHENNAI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY2
  5. 5DR BIPLAB HAZRA1
  6. 6INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY1
  7. 7WUHAN UNIV1
  8. 8LEELADHAR NAGDEVE1
  9. 9DR JAGADISH PARIDA1
  10. 10DR BISHUB CHOUDHURY1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 23-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A late, sharp acceleration

Filings sat at zero through 2017 and stayed flat at the 2022 midpoint, then rose to a peak of 13 in 2025 before the partial 2026 count of 2. That shape points to a cluster that only recently became patentable subject matter worth claiming — likely as WAAM moved from lab-scale demonstration toward parts qualified for corrosive or thermally cycled service.

A late, sharp acceleration048111502017201820192020202120222023202413202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Welding process claims dominate; alloy chemistry is a minority

Every record in the set touches B23K (welding, soldering and brazing), and most also touch B33Y (additive manufacturing) — confirming this is a process-and-durability search rather than a materials-chemistry one. B22F (powder metallurgy) appears in nine records, while C22C (alloys) and C23C (coating and surface deposition) each appear in only one to three, suggesting alloy-composition and post-deposition coating claims are still a small share of this specific durability niche.

Welding process claims dominate; alloy chemistry is a minorityB23K · Welding, soldering & brazing23100.0%B33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D pri…1565.2%B22F · Powder metallurgy939.1%C22C · Alloys313.0%B23P · Metal working (general)28.7%B21F · Wire working14.3%B29C · Shaping of plastics14.3%C23C · Coating & surface deposition14.3%Other28.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 23 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Environmental Durability with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about wire arc additive manufacturing environmental durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The records carrying the citation weight

Representative filing
US20220001476A12022-01-06

Wire arc additive manufacturing method for high-strength aluminum alloy component, equipment and product (US20220001476A1)

WUHAN UNIVERSITY

The disclosure relates to the field of wire arc additive manufacturing, and specifically discloses a wire arc additive manufacturing method for a high-strength aluminum alloy component, equipment and a product. A high-strength aluminum alloy is modified by using a MXene nanomaterial, and wire arc additive manufacturing is performed by using the modified high-strength aluminum alloy as a raw material, and a nanosecond laser beam is applied during the wire arc additive manufacturing to achieve an enhanced arc cathode atomization cleanup function to remove impurities, thus obtaining a high-strength aluminum alloy component without defects.Filed by Wuhan University; published 2022-01-06. It is the most-cited record in this dataset.

US20220001476A1 — patent drawing 1US20220001476A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20220001476A1Wire arc additive manufacturing method for high-strength aluminum alloy component, equipment and product22
2US20210402506A1Wire and arc additive manufacturing method for magnesium alloy14
3US20210402507A1Wire and arc additive manufacturing method for titanium alloy12
4WO2024194853A1Wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) system for producing parts with customized reinforcement2
5US11945042B2Wire and arc additive manufacturing method for magnesium alloy1

Citation counts reflect activity inside this searched corpus and favour older records; treat them as a signal of influence rather than current importance.

Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (5 of 5 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Four read-outs from the same 23-family set, focused on what an R&D or IP team would actually do differently because of them.

Filing pace
0 → 13
2017 to 2025 peak

The cluster is still forming

Growth stayed flat through the 2022 midpoint and then jumped to 13 filings in 2025. A field that moves from zero to its peak in three years has not yet settled on dominant claim scope, which is exactly when a well-drafted application can still stake out broad ground.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Geography
14 India vs 6 US
receiving office filings

India is the leading filing venue, not the US

Fourteen of the tracked filings route through India's patent office against six through the USPTO, with WIPO and EPO trailing further behind. Teams assuming US or European coverage maps the field will miss the largest single bloc of activity.

Receiving offices
Alloy specificity
22 citations
on the top-cited aluminium alloy record

Citation weight sits on alloy-specific methods

The most-cited record in the set (22 citations) and the next two both claim durability methods tied to a specific alloy family — aluminium, magnesium, titanium — rather than a generic WAAM process. Design-around analysis should be run per alloy family, not against the process as a whole.

Most-cited records
Assignee concentration
23 families, 9 co-assignee pairs
collaboration density

A long tail with light collaboration

With 23 total families and only nine co-assignee pairs — the strongest linked to a single named inventor across three pairings — this is a field of largely independent filers rather than a small number of tightly networked labs or consortia.

Co-assignee pairs
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to wire arc additive manufacturing environmental durability, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the claim space is still open

Recent-year momentum is muted across the board — most named assignees show zero filings in the latest year, several down sharply from a prior peak — which fits a dataset still dominated by 2025's surge rather than sustained multi-year programmes.

Momentum leader
1 filing
latest year

SUDIPTA SWAIN

The only named assignee with any filing activity in the most recent year, and the anchor of the dataset's three strongest co-assignee pairings — with Parth Patel, Dr Shakti Kumar, and Dr Jagadish Parida.

Recent-year momentum
Academic filer
0 in latest year
prior activity only

Northeastern University (China) (Northeastern University, China)

Shows no filings in the latest tracked year, placing its activity earlier in the window rather than in the 2025 surge.

Recent-year momentum
Academic filer, declining
-100% YoY
latest year

DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY

Filed previously but shows a full year-over-year drop to zero in the latest period, alongside Chennai Institute of Technology and BFGoodrich (US) (BFGoodrich, US) on the same trajectory.

Recent-year momentum
European academic filer
0 in latest year
prior activity only

Universidade Nova de Lisboa

One of the few non-Asian, non-Indian academic assignees in the set, also inactive in the most recent tracked year.

Recent-year momentum
🔍
Under-claimed branches
Sub-areas with thin coverage relative to the core welding-process claims
post-deposition coating for corrosion sealingalloy-specific oxidation-resistance claims beyond Al/Mg/Tiin-process cathode/atomization cleanup for impurity controlwire-feed durability for dissimilar-metal jointsservice-life qualification testing methods
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
SUDIPTA SWAIN1
Northeastern University (China)0
DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY0-100%
CHENNAI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY0-100%
BFGoodrich (US)0-100%
Universidade Nova de Lisboa0
Wuhan University0
Board of Regents, The University of Texas System0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset flags where activity is concentrated and where it is thin. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going a level deeper on the specific claims.

Run a design-around check per alloy family

Citation weight sits on aluminium, magnesium and titanium-specific durability methods, not on the WAAM process broadly. Check claim scope against the alloy family you actually intend to deposit.

Explore this in Eureka

Watch India's receiving office, not just the USPTO

With 14 of 23 tracked filings routed through India, a US-only or EPO-only watch will miss the largest bloc of activity in this niche.

Set up a filing alert in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches before they fill in

Post-deposition coating, service-life qualification methods and dissimilar-metal joint durability show thin coverage relative to the core welding-process claims — early filings there have more room to set scope.

Map white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Environmental Durability in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole wire arc additive manufacturing environmental durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.