Book a demo

Wireless BMS / Cloud Battery Patent Snapshot 2026

Wireless BMS / Cloud Battery Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
Wireless BMS / Cloud Battery Patent Snapshot in 2026

The Wireless BMS / Cloud Battery patent corpus is nascent — 12 patent families in scope — and dominated by Indian academic and engineering institutions, with no single assignee holding more than one family. Filing activity accelerated sharply in 2025, consistent with an early-growth field where publication lag is still suppressing the most recent counts.

12
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Academic institutions lead a fragmented, early-stage field

SRI SAL RAM INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY leads the ranking with one patent family, tied with thirteen other applicants — every filer in the top 100 holds exactly one family, reflecting extreme fragmentation. No corporate incumbent has yet established a commanding position.

The top five filers account for 36% of the combined total across the ranked applicants visible in this query, which for a field this small means concentration is structurally modest: no applicant has accumulated a blocking portfolio. The tier gap between leader and follower is zero by family count.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Sri Sal Ram Institute of Technology1
2Dr. D.Y. Patil Institute of Technology, Pimpri, Pune1
3Vishwakarma Institute of Technology1
4Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology1
5Saveetha Engineering College1
6Chandigarh University1
7Dr. Sunil Dhull1
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
8Balakrishnan P1
9GITAM Deemed to be University1
10Gopinath S1
11Daymak1
12Vijayarangan Kamatchi Kannan1
13Santosh V. Patil1
14Akash S. Ghodake1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The dominance of Indian engineering colleges and universities signals that Wireless BMS / Cloud Battery is still in an exploratory research phase rather than a commercial-deployment phase; corporate assignees such as Daymak remain isolated exceptions. This leaves the field open to first-mover advantage for industrial entrants willing to file defensively.

Filings from 2025 onward are subject to publication lag and will be revised upward as more applications publish; the 2026 figure in particular should be treated as a lower bound. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A 2025 filing surge and a power-centric technology mix

The annual trend and IPC composition charts together tell a consistent story: the field was dormant before 2021, picked up isolated filings through 2024, and then registered a sharp volume increase in 2025. Technology breadth is notable given the small corpus, but power supply and wireless networking classes anchor the mix.

Annual filing trend

Activity was zero from 2017 through 2020, reached single-digit annual counts in 2021–2022 and 2024, then jumped in 2025. The 2025 and 2026 bars are subject to publication lag and likely undercount true activity; the trend should be read as accelerating, not plateauing.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 8 in 2025.02017020180201902020120211202202023120248202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H02J (Power supply and grid systems) and H04W (Wireless communication networks) are the two visible IPC branches, consistent with the core BMS-plus-connectivity proposition. G06F (digital data processing) appears at lower frequency, reflecting emerging cloud analytics angles. Numerous low-count branches — including A61B, G02B, and footwear/headwear classes — suggest that some filings bundle BMS concepts into broader IoT or wearable applications rather than treating battery management as the primary subject.

Technology compositionH02J · Power supply & grid systems leads with 8; H04W · Wireless communication networks 6.H02J · Power supply & gr…8H04W · Wireless communic…6G06F · Electric digital …3A61B · Diagnosis & surgery2B60L · Electric vehicle …2G02B · Optical elements …2G05B · Control & regulat…2G06Q · Business, commerc…2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2011135385A3Published 2013-06-20

Rechargeable battery packages

Gyenes Innovations Limited

An electric vehicle (4) with a rechargeable battery package (5) and a recharging system (1) for recharging the package (5). The package 5 has a plurality of rechargeable cells (50) and an integrated RFID tag (51) that is powered by an independent lithium-ion battery and has first and second memory areas. The first memory area is configured to permanently… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Solar electric vehicle cryptocurrency mining system5

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Sri Sal Ram Institute of Technology

Sri Sal Ram Institute of Technology

Holds 1 patent family with technology emphasis spanning water and wastewater treatment (C02F), material analysis (G01N), and power supply systems (H02J 7). This cross-disciplinary spread is typical of an academic institution exploring BMS integration in broader energy and environmental contexts. Momentum data is not available for this applicant in the recent-period comparison.

families: 1
Challenger · Daymak

Daymak

The sole identified corporate applicant in the ranked set, holding 1 patent family. As a manufacturer of electric vehicles and personal mobility devices, Daymak’s presence signals that commercial operators are beginning to file in this space. No recent-period momentum figure is available for Daymak, but its industry background distinguishes it from the academic majority.

families: 1
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Chandigarh UniversityKalinga Institute of Industrial Technology+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.