Wireless Charging Module Patent Landscape 2026
Wireless Charging Module Patent Landscape in 2026
The wireless charging module space is heavily concentrated, with Samsung Electronics commanding the top position among a ranked cohort dominated by consumer-electronics incumbents. Annual filing volume peaked in 2020 and has since eased, signalling a maturing field where differentiation is shifting toward adjacent technical branches rather than raw volume.
Samsung leads a concentrated field; five players account for 78% of the top-100 filers’ combined output
Samsung Electronics holds the top-ranked position by a wide margin, followed by LG Electronics, Intel, Huawei, and Apple. The top five filers collectively account for 78% of the combined patent records among the hundred largest applicants, a concentration level that signals a well-defended core technology space.
The gap between the first-ranked applicant and the rest of the field is substantial, creating a clear two-tier structure: a small group of large-scale consumer-electronics and semiconductor firms, and a longer tail of specialist companies, medical-device makers, and component suppliers each holding far smaller positions.
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 9,222 | |
| 2 | LG Electronics Inc. | 2,578 | |
| 3 | Intel Corporation | 1,698 | |
| 4 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 1,201 | |
| 5 | Apple Inc. | 1,026 | |
| 6 | Honor Device Co., Ltd. | 417 | |
| 7 | Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC | 311 | |
| 8 | Qualcomm Inc. | 141 | |
| 9 | Google LLC | 126 | |
| 10 | Meta Platforms Technologies LLC | 122 |
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | GN Hearing A/S | 116 | |
| 12 | Hewlett Packard Development Company LP | 115 | |
| 13 | Hand Held Products Inc. | 114 | |
| 14 | Dexcom Inc. | 111 | |
| 15 | Dell Products LP | 105 | |
| 16 | Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd. | 99 | |
| 17 | Sivantos Pte. Ltd. | 92 | |
| 18 | Earlens Corporation | 80 | |
| 19 | Shenzhen Shokz Co., Ltd. | 80 | |
| 20 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | 79 |
This concentration implies that foundational wireless charging IP is firmly held by established players with broad cross-portfolio leverage. Entrants and challengers will likely need to target specific application verticals — such as medical wearables, automotive, or audio accessories — rather than the smartphone-centric core where incumbents are entrenched.
Patent records from the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and should be treated as under-counts; final activity levels for 2024–2026 will be higher than current figures suggest. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.
Activity peaked in 2020 and has eased; digital-data-processing and telephony classes dominate the technology mix
Two lenses — annual filing volume and IPC class composition — together reveal how the field’s competitive energy is distributed across time and technology.
Annual filing trend
Annual patent records rose to a peak of 2,119 in 2020, then eased through 2022 before declining more sharply in 2023. Figures for 2024 onward reflect publication lag and will rise as prosecution completes; the apparent steep drop should not be read as a real-time collapse in R&D investment. The multi-year pattern confirms a field that expanded rapidly through the late 2010s and is now consolidating.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaTechnology composition
G06F (electric digital data processing) and H04M (telephonic communication) account for the two largest IPC branches, reflecting the smartphone-centric origin of most wireless charging module IP. H04R (loudspeakers and audio transducers), H02J (power supply and grid systems), and H04W (wireless communication networks) form a secondary tier, pointing toward hearables, power-delivery standards, and connectivity integration as active adjacent areas.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaHighly cited patent families surfaced by the query
Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.
Wireless charging headphone
A wireless charging headphone (<b>10</b>) includes a headphone housing (<b>1</b>), a speaker module (<b>2</b>) and a ring-shaped wireless charging module (<b>3</b>). The headphone housing (<b>1</b>) includes a front housing (<b>11</b>) and a cavity (s), and the front housing (<b>11</b>) includes a plurality of acoustic holes (<b>111</b>). The speaker module… (excerpt from the patent abstract)


| # | Patent | Citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Systems and methods for customizing delivery of se… | 1,269 |
| 2 | System, Method, and Apparatus for Electronic Patie… | 1,135 |
| 3 | Electronic device | 968 |
| 4 | Advanced continuous analyte monitoring system | 825 |
| 5 | Devices and Methods for a Ring Computing Device | 812 |
| 6 | Systems and methods for communicating sensor data … | 748 |
| 7 | System for displaying and controlling medical moni… | 675 |
| 8 | System for displaying and controlling medical moni… | 574 |
Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.
What the competitive structure means for R&D and investment decisions
The field’s maturity, concentration, and collaboration patterns each carry distinct implications for teams evaluating where to invest in wireless charging module innovation.
Field is in decline phase, with volume easing from its 2020 peak
Annual filing volume peaked in 2020 at 2,119 records and has contracted in every subsequent year on the evidence available. This pattern is consistent with a technology that has passed its fastest-growth phase and is entering portfolio consolidation. Teams entering now will face a dense thicket of existing IP in core smartphone-charging claims; differentiation requires moving into less-covered application verticals or next-generation power architectures.
Post-peak consolidation78% top-5 share among the hundred largest filers leaves limited room in the core
The top five applicants — Samsung, LG Electronics, Intel, Huawei, and Apple — hold 78% of combined patent records among the top 100 filers. This extreme concentration means that any claim in the dominant G06F/H04M space risks overlap with incumbents’ portfolios. Challengers are better served by staking positions in underserved branches such as H02J (power delivery), H05K (printed-circuit integration), or medical and automotive sub-domains where the large incumbents are less active.
High concentrationSamsung anchors most co-filing activity; Huawei–Peking University pairing notable in academia
Samsung Electronics is the hub of the most active co-applicant relationships, filing jointly with Easmartec (7 co-filings), Goertek (5), Hirose Electric Korea (5), KAIST (4), RF Technology (4), and Hansol Technology (4), among others. Huawei’s co-filing with Peking University (3 joint records) is the most prominent academia–industry pairing outside the Samsung ecosystem. These relationships suggest that component suppliers and university labs are being drawn into the IP strategies of the dominant players.
Samsung-centric ecosystemUS and EPO filings dominate; China and Korea underrepresented relative to industry activity
The United States leads all jurisdictions by a wide margin, followed by Europe (EPO) and WIPO PCT filings, reflecting the priorities of the primarily US- and Korea-headquartered incumbents seeking broad market coverage. China’s comparatively low direct-filing count is notable given the presence of Huawei, Honor, Oppo, and other Chinese applicants in the ranking, suggesting these firms may be routing broader protection through PCT or EPO rather than direct CNIPA filings in this corpus.
US-EPO dominantGo beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.
| Applicant | Collaborator | Co-filings |
|---|---|---|
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Easmartec Co., Ltd. | 7 |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Goertek Inc. | 5 |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Hirose Electric Korea Co., Ltd. | 5 |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) | 4 |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | RF Technology Co., Ltd. | 4 |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Hansol Technology Co., Ltd. | 4 |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Molex LLC | 3 |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Peking University | 3 |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Yonsei University | 2 |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Seoul National University R&DB Foundation | 2 |
Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.
Samsung and Honor diverge sharply in momentum; telephony and digital-data-processing claims define both
The top-ranked players share a common focus on H04M telephonic communication and G06F digital data processing, but their recent filing trajectories diverge dramatically — Samsung consolidates while Honor accelerates.
Samsung Electronics
Samsung holds the top position with 9,222 patent records, nearly four times the second-ranked applicant. Its technology focus sits in H04M telephonic communication (3,926 records), G06F digital data processing (3,243), and G06F human-interface sub-classes (1,811), reflecting deep smartphone-charging integration. Recent-period momentum shows a measured decline of 11% versus the prior three years, consistent with portfolio maturation rather than strategic retreat.
patent records: 9,222Honor Device Co.
Honor Device holds 417 patent records and is the standout momentum story in this field, with recent filings running at 4.6× the prior three-year base — the strongest growth trend among ranked applicants. Its focus mirrors Samsung’s: H04M telephonic communication (139 records), G06F human-interface (106), and G06F power management (90). As a relatively recent independent entity, Honor’s trajectory signals aggressive IP-building in the smartphone charging domain and warrants monitoring for freedom-to-operate risk.
patent records: 417| Applicant | Recent (3 yrs) | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 1,553 | ▼ -11% |
| LG Electronics Inc. | 30 | ▼ -91% |
| Intel Corporation | 450 | ▼ -34% |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 304 | ▼ -41% |
| Apple Inc. | 209 | ▼ -32% |
| Honor Device Co., Ltd. | 223 | ▲ 4.6× vs prior 3-yr |
| Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC | 41 | ▼ -24% |
| Google LLC | 34 | ▼ -24% |
Under-served branches in audio integration and power-delivery standards
Several IPC branches sit adjacent to the dominant G06F/H04M core but carry materially lower share of the corpus, pointing to areas where the IP landscape is comparatively less crowded and where wireless charging functionality is being integrated into new product categories.
H02J · Power Supply & Grid Systems
H02J captures charging-circuit architecture, power delivery protocols, and grid-side management — the enabling layer beneath module integration. Its share of the corpus (around 5%) is notably lower than the application-layer G06F and H04M classes that dominate, despite being technically foundational. For teams focused on next-generation charging standards (higher wattage, bidirectional charging, or vehicle-to-grid) this branch offers a more open IP environment relative to the smartphone application layer, with a realistic entry path via novel coil topologies, foreign-object detection, or adaptive impedance-matching circuits.
Search this in Eureka →H05K · Printed Circuits & Assemblies
H05K covers the physical integration of wireless charging coils and receiver modules into printed-circuit assemblies — a critical manufacturing and miniaturisation frontier as charging is embedded into thinner wearables, hearables, and medical implants. With roughly 3% share of corpus records, this branch is materially underrepresented relative to the end-device application classes. The entry path for specialists in flex-PCB design, multi-layer coil fabrication, or thermal management of embedded charging modules is plausible and technically distinct from the incumbent smartphone IP thicket.
Search this in Eureka →How leading applicants differ by IPC technology route
Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.
| Player | H04M 1 · Telephonic communication | G06F 1 · Electric digital data processing | G06F 3 · Electric digital data processing | H02J 7 · Power supply & grid systems | H04R 1 · Loudspeakers & audio transducers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Strong · 3,926 | Strong · 3,243 | Moderate · 1,811 | Emerging · 371 | Emerging · 492 |
| LG Electronics Inc. | Strong · 1,746 | Moderate · 629 | Strong · 874 | Emerging · 43 | Emerging · 62 |
| Apple Inc. | Strong · 339 | Strong · 409 | Strong · 261 | Moderate · 123 | Moderate · 193 |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Strong · 492 | Moderate · 168 | Strong · 294 | Absent | Moderate · 116 |
| Intel Corporation | Absent | Strong · 248 | Strong · 130 | Moderate · 51 | Absent |
| Honor Device Co., Ltd. | Strong · 139 | Strong · 90 | Strong · 106 | Moderate · 32 | Absent |
| Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC | Moderate · 45 | Strong · 125 | Strong · 67 | Moderate · 50 | Absent |
Frequently asked questions
The corpus contains 14,254 patent families. This is the universe of patent families used for trend, jurisdiction, and technology-composition analysis in this report.
Samsung Electronics is the top-ranked applicant with 9,222 patent records — nearly four times the volume of the second-ranked applicant, LG Electronics, which holds 2,578 records.
Annual filing volume peaked in 2020 at 2,119 records and has eased in subsequent years. The field is classified as being in a decline phase relative to its 2020 peak. Note that figures for 2024 and later remain under-counted due to publication lag and will revise upward as pending applications publish.
The United States leads with 11,650 patent records, followed by Europe via EPO with 5,936 records and WIPO PCT with 1,588 records. Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom make up the next tier. These counts are at the patent-record level and reflect the filing strategies of primarily US- and Korea-headquartered incumbents.
G06F (electric digital data processing) and H04M (telephonic communication) are the two dominant branches, reflecting the smartphone-charging origin of most IP in this space. H04R (loudspeakers and audio transducers), H02J (power supply and grid systems), and H04W (wireless communication networks) form a secondary tier covering hearables, power-delivery architecture, and connectivity.
Honor Device Co. shows the strongest positive momentum among ranked applicants, with recent filings running at 4.6× its prior three-year base. This compares with declining trends for most other top applicants, including LG Electronics (down 91%), Huawei (down 41%), and Intel (down 34%), though Samsung’s decline is more modest at 11%.
Ready to map your own wireless charging module landscape?
Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.