https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/wireless-charging-standards-and-magnetic-alignment-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Wireless Power Transfer
Wireless charging standards and magnetic alignment patents: mapping who controls interoperability and foreign object detection
  • One assignee dominates the ranked field. the leader holds 21 records against a fifth-place count of 2 and a tenth-place count of 1 across the 11 ranked companies.
  • Filing activity has already peaked once. the corpus shows 17 records in 2022, with 2026 volume (partial year) far below that high point.
  • Claims cluster overwhelmingly in power supply architecture. 95.6% of the 45 records in scope carry an H02J classification, versus 26.7% for digital transmission and 22.2% for general transmission protocols.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
45
Published Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
11
Active Filers Ranked
2022
Peak Filing Year

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

This review covers patent filings addressing wireless charging standards and magnetic alignment — the interoperability layer that lets a phone, wearable or accessory negotiate a power profile, authenticate a charging session, detect a foreign object on the coil, and align magnetically with a transmitter built by a different manufacturer. The scope combines records matching wireless charging standard or magnetic power profile terminology with claim language on magnet arrays, power profiles, interoperability testing, foreign object detection or authentication handshakes.

The dataset spans 45 published records from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off. Publication normally lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent year's count understates real filing activity and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1LG ELECTRONICS INC21
  2. 2HONOR DEVICE CO LTD5
  3. 3APPLE INC5
  4. 4GE HYBRID TECHNOLOGIES LLC4
  5. 5DANIEL ALAN RUST2
  6. 6BENJAMIN KIMBERLIN MCCALLUM BROWN2
  7. 7INTEL CORP2
  8. 8BLUE RIDGE INNOVATIONS LLC2
  9. 9INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG2
  10. 10NXP BV1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wireless Charging Standards and Magnetic Alignment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 45-record corpus: how filing volume moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings started from zero in 2017, built through the intervening years and peaked at 17 records in 2022. The 2026 figure of 2 is a partial-year count and will rise as later filings publish.

Filing trend, 2017-20260510152002017201820192020202117202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

H02J (power supply and grid systems) appears on 95.6% of the 45 records in scope, confirming this is fundamentally a power-electronics claim space. H04L (26.7%) and H04B (22.2%) show a meaningful but secondary presence of communication-protocol claims for the negotiation and authentication layer, while B64D and G01V each appear on a single record and mark edge applications rather than a real sub-field.

IPC subclass compositionH02J · Power supply & grid systems4395.6%H04L · Digital information transmissi…1226.7%H04B · Transmission (general)1022.2%B64D · Aircraft equipment12.2%G01V · Geophysics & gravity surveying12.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 45 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wireless Charging Standards and Magnetic Alignment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Wireless Charging Standards and Magnetic Alignment with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about wireless charging standards and magnetic alignment and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this corpus

Representative Filing
US20230006477A12023-01-05

Wearable device, smart card and system (US20230006477A1)

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG

A wearable device including an antenna structure, a chip having a receiver electrically coupled to the antenna structure and configured to receive radio signals via it, and a trigger device arranged in or on the wearable device. The trigger device comprises electrically conductive material and is configured to trigger foreign object detection in a wireless energy charger in accordance with a wireless charging standard, by taking up load from radio waves emitted by the charger.Filed by Infineon Technologies AG; published 2023-01-05.

US20230006477A1 — patent drawing 1US20230006477A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records, 2015-2026
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20170187221A1Detecting objects placed on wireless charger9
2WO2023282548A1Method and device for providing compatibility with MPP in wireless power transmission system5
3US20240313826A1Method and device for providing compatibility with MPP in wireless power transmission system4
4US20220416581A1Aggregated wireless power transfer with multiple coils and communication channels4
5US20240243620A1Method and device for achieving compatibility between profiles in wireless power transmission system3
6US20250088033A1Magnetic cover and methods and apparatus to detect positioning of the magnetic cover over a wireless charging…2
7CN117639188A一种无线充电控制方法及电子设备2
8JP2024525586A無線電力送信システムでMPPとの互換性を提供する方法及び装置2
9WO2023277671A1Method and device for achieving compatibility between profiles in wireless power transmission system1
10EP4354704A1Method and device for providing compatibility with MPP in wireless power transmission system1

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older records that have had more time to accumulate citations; treat them as a signal of influence rather than of current technical importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wireless Charging Standards and Magnetic Alignment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, composition and citation data that matter for scoping new claims or freedom-to-operate work.

Peak Filing Year
17 records
2022

Activity has already crested once

Filing volume rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 17 records in 2022, then declined. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, the true 2025-2026 filing level cannot yet be read from published counts, but the shape of the curve suggests the field is past its first wave rather than still building toward one.

Based on the 2017-2026 filing trend
Claim Concentration
95.6%
of 45 records carry H02J

Power-architecture claims dominate the space

Almost every record in scope touches H02J power supply and grid systems, while H04L and H04B communication-protocol classes appear on roughly a quarter of records each. That gap indicates the negotiation, authentication and interoperability-testing layer is comparatively thin on filed claims relative to the underlying power-transfer hardware.

IPC subclass shares, 45-record base
Assignee Spread
21 vs 2
leader vs fifth-place filer

One filer, then a steep drop

Across the 11 companies in the ranked field, the leader holds 21 records while fifth place holds only 2 and tenth place just 1. That gap between the top position and everyone else is the clearest signal in this dataset: most ranked participants have filed only a handful of records each.

Assignee ranking, 11 companies
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to wireless charging standards and magnetic alignment, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wireless Charging Standards and Magnetic Alignment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players & White Space

Who is filing, and what is left unclaimed

The ranked field is short and top-heavy; the openings sit in branches the leader has not fully occupied.

Leader
21 records
top-ranked assignee

A single company anchors the field

The top assignee's record count is an order of magnitude above the rest of the ranked field, consistent with a company that has driven the underlying interoperability standard itself. That concentration makes its published claims the first checkpoint for any freedom-to-operate review in this space.

Leader vs. 11 ranked assignees
Momentum
-33% YoY
leader's latest-year change

Even the leader's pace has slowed

The top assignee's most recent-year filings are down year over year, and several other ranked assignees show no filings at all in the latest year. Read cautiously given publication lag, this points to a maturing claim set at the top of the field rather than fresh land-grab activity.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Long Tail
1 record
tenth-ranked assignee

Most participants have filed once or twice

Beyond the leader, filing counts fall quickly to single digits and the tenth-ranked assignee holds just one record. That long tail includes named individual inventors alongside established electronics and semiconductor firms, suggesting parts of this space remain open to a well-drafted first filing.

Assignee ranking, positions 5-10
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches where the composition and citation data show thin coverage relative to the core power-transfer claims.
Foreign-object-detection trigger materialsCross-standard authentication handshakesMulti-coil aggregated power profilesMagnet-array alignment tolerancingInteroperability test-protocol claims
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
LG Electronics Inc.2-33%
GE Hybrid Technologies LLC0
Honor Device Co., Ltd.0
Apple Inc.0-100%
Infineon Technologies AG0
Intel Corporation0
RUST DANIEL A & BROWN BENJAMIN K M0
Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wireless Charging Standards and Magnetic Alignment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a top-heavy field with a thin communication-protocol layer. These are the natural next steps for a team acting on it.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on the leader's claims

With 21 of the ranked field's records concentrated in one assignee, any new filing on power profile negotiation or magnet-array design should be checked against that portfolio first.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Scope claims in the communication-protocol layer

H04L and H04B classes cover roughly a quarter of records each, well below the H02J share, suggesting authentication and interoperability-testing claims are less crowded than the core power-transfer hardware.

Map white space in Eureka

Track the post-peak filing pattern before committing budget

Filing peaked at 17 records in 2022 and has since declined; confirm whether the 2025-2026 dip is a real slowdown or a publication-lag artefact before sizing a competitive response.

Monitor filing trends in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wireless Charging Standards and Magnetic Alignment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wireless Charging Standards and Magnetic Alignment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Wireless Charging Standards and Magnetic Alignment in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole wireless charging standards and magnetic alignment corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.