Book a demo

Wireless EV Charging for Passenger Vehicles Patent Landscape

Wireless EV Charging for Passenger Vehicles Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Wireless EV Charging for Passenger Vehicles Patent Landscape in 2026

The corpus in scope contains only 2 patent families, with activity concentrated across two applicants — Audi AG and Francis Xavier Engineering College — signalling that this precise sub-field remains at a very early, pre-competitive stage. The dominant technical branch is B60L (electric vehicle propulsion), with filings appearing in Germany and India.

2
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
Germany
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··4 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Two applicants share the entire corpus — concentration is absolute

The ranked applicant list is led by Audi AG and Francis Xavier Engineering College, each holding 1 patent family. Together they account for 100% of the top hundred filers’ combined total, meaning no other organization has yet established a meaningful position in this precisely defined sub-field.

With only two applicants, there is no meaningful tier gap to describe — the field has not yet reached the stage where a visible incumbent and a trailing challenger bracket exists. Both filers are first movers at this level of specificity.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Audi AG1
2Francis Xavier Engineering College1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Audi AG’s presence indicates that at least one major OEM has begun staking IP territory in wireless passenger-vehicle charging, while the appearance of Francis Xavier Engineering College suggests academic-side exploration. Neither position is large enough to signal locked-in exclusivity.

The most recent filing period is subject to publication lag of approximately 18–24 months, so the apparent absence of 20242026 activity should not be read as stagnation; additional families may not yet be publicly visible.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Sparse, episodic filings with a broad but shallow technology mix

The annual trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that has produced isolated filings rather than a sustained wave of innovation, with the technical scope spanning propulsion, power conversion, and data processing branches.

Annual filing trend

Filings are effectively zero across most of the decade, with a single family recorded in 2023 and one in 2025. The 2024 and 2026 zeros should be treated cautiously given publication lag; it is too early to interpret the recent period as a trend. Overall, the annual cadence shows no established growth trajectory.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1 in 2023.02017020180201902020020210202212023020241202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B60L (electric vehicle propulsion) is the anchor class, appearing in both families, which confirms that charging-system integration is the primary frame. Secondary branches — B60R (vehicle parts and accessories), G06F (digital data processing), G08C (transmission of measured values), H02J (power supply and grid systems), and H02M (power conversion) — each appear once, indicating broad but thin coverage across the wireless charging stack.

Technology compositionB60L · Electric vehicle propulsion leads with 2; B60R · Vehicles, parts & accessories 1.B60L · Electric vehicle …2B60R · Vehicles, parts &…1G06F · Electric digital …1G08C · Transmission of m…1H02J · Power supply & gr…1H02M · Power conversion …1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
IN202541071185APublished 2025-08-01

A contactless bidirectional charging system for el…

Francis Xavier Engineering College

The present invention discloses a contactless bidirectional charging system for electric vehicles (EVs) utilizing resonant power conversion technology to enable efficient, safe, and automated wireless energy transfer. The system comprises a primary power transmitter unit integrated within the charging infrastructure and a secondary receiver unit mounted on… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the structure means for R&D investment decisions

With only 2 patent families and 2 applicants, competitive intelligence drawn from this corpus is necessarily limited. The observations below reflect the current evidence and should be updated as publication lag resolves.

Maturity

Pre-competitive, embryonic stage

The lifecycle stage cannot be formally classified from available evidence — the corpus is too small to derive a statistically meaningful stage label. Practically, two isolated filings over a decade-long window, with no year producing more than one family, places this sub-field in an embryonic, pre-competitive phase. Entrants face minimal incumbent IP friction at this level of specificity.

Early stage
Concentration

100% of ranked activity held by two filers

The top five filers account for 100% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total — but in practice there are only two filers. This level of concentration is an artifact of corpus size rather than strategic lock-in. Any new entrant filing even a handful of families would materially shift the competitive balance. The concentration metric will be more meaningful once the corpus grows.

Duopoly (nascent)
Collaboration

No co-applicant activity detected

Evidence pending — the collaboration data shows no co-filed patents within the in-scope corpus. Neither Audi AG nor Francis Xavier Engineering College has pursued joint filings in this sub-field based on available records. This absence may reflect the early stage of the technology rather than a deliberate go-it-alone strategy, and should be revisited as the corpus expands.

No co-filing
Geography

Germany and India are the only active jurisdictions

Patent activity has been filed in Germany (one record) and India (one record), corresponding to the home jurisdictions of the two applicants. There is currently no coverage in major EV markets such as the United States, China, Japan, or South Korea. This leaves those jurisdictions entirely open at the patent level for this specific sub-field, subject to confirmation as publication lag clears.

Two jurisdictions
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are drawn from applicant rankings, lifecycle indicators, collaboration records, and jurisdiction data within the in-scope corpus.Explore insights →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Audi AG

Audi AG

Audi AG holds 1 patent family, filed in Germany (DE102023109384B4). Its technical emphasis spans B60L 53 (electric vehicle propulsion), B60R 16 (vehicle parts and accessories), and G06F 8 (digital data processing), suggesting an integrated systems approach to wireless charging. Applicant momentum is recorded as a new entrant, consistent with a single recent filing rather than a sustained programme.

Patent families: 1
Challenger · Francis Xavier Engineering College

Francis Xavier Engineering College

Francis Xavier Engineering College holds 1 patent family, filed in India (IN202541071185A). Its technical focus covers B60L 53 and B60L 55 (electric vehicle propulsion sub-classes) and H02J 50 (wireless power transfer within power supply systems), indicating a more power-transfer-centric approach compared to Audi AG’s system-integration framing. No momentum trend data is available beyond the single filing.

Patent families: 1
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Audi AGFrancis Xavier Engineering College+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own wireless charging IP landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.