Book a demo

Wireless EV Charging for Recreational Vehicles Patent Landscape

Wireless EV Charging for Recreational Vehicles Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Wireless EV Charging for Recreational Vehicles Patent Landscape in 2026

The wireless EV charging for recreational vehicles patent corpus is small and highly concentrated, with Access Business Group International LLC holding a commanding share of a field that peaked around 2018 and has seen no recorded filings since. New entrants face a sparse but technically mature prior-art base dominated by inductive charging and power-supply systems.

2
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United Kingdom
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Access Business Group leads a tightly concentrated field

Access Business Group International LLC sits at the top of the applicant ranking, followed by Philips IP Ventures BV in second position; several individual inventors share the remaining slots.

The top five filers account for 71% of the combined total among the ranked applicants visible in this query, indicating very high concentration with a sharp tier gap between the institutional leaders and the individual-inventor cohort below them.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Access Business Group International LLC6
2Philips IP Ventures BV3
3STONER JR WILLIAM T2
4STONER JR T2
5TAYLOR JOSHUA B2
6WEBER RICHARD J2
7BAARMAN DAVID W2
8EURICH SEAN T2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions reflect early-mover investment in inductive charging fundamentals, with Access Business Group in particular holding broad coverage across electric vehicle propulsion (B60L), power supply systems (H02J), and transformer/inductor design (H01F).

The most recent filing years should be treated with caution due to typical patent publication lags; absence of records in 2019 onward does not necessarily confirm complete cessation of activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing activity peaked in 2018 and technology focus sits firmly in inductive power transfer

Two views together tell the structural story: the annual trend shows when and how quickly activity accumulated, while the technology composition reveals which IPC branches carry the most weight.

Annual filing trend

A single filing was recorded in each of 2018 and 2019, with no activity visible before or after in the evidence window. The field reached its peak around 2018 and has eased back entirely since. Note that the most recent periods are subject to publication lag and may undercount activity.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1 in 2018.02017120181201902020020210202202023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B60L (electric vehicle propulsion) and H02J (power supply and grid systems) are the visible branches, closely followed by H01F (magnets, inductors, and transformers). Measurement, navigation, transmission, and traffic-control branches each contribute only one or two records, pointing to underdeveloped supporting technology layers.

Technology compositionB60L · Electric vehicle propulsion leads with 11; H02J · Power supply & grid systems 10.B60L · Electric vehicle …11H02J · Power supply & gr…10H01F · Magnets, inductor…8G01R · Electric & magnet…2H04B · Transmission (gen…2G01C · Distance, navigat…1G05D · Control of non-el…1G08G · Traffic control s…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
EP3597475A1Published 2020-01-22

LADENDE PARKSTRUKTUR FÜR ELEKTROFAHRZEUG

SHAM, Wellen

Embodiments facilitate handling of charging parking interactions between electric vehicles (EVs) and parking structures having charging parking spaces. For example, a parking deck has a large number of parking spaces on multiple levels, and is accessible by one or more entrances. Some of the parking spaces in the parking deck are charging parking spaces… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

LADENDE PARKSTRUKTUR FÜR ELEKTROFAHRZEUG — patent drawingLADENDE PARKSTRUKTUR FÜR ELEKTROFAHRZEUG — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Inductive charging system for electric vehicle57
2Inductive charging system for electric vehicle33
3Inductive charging system for electric vehicle24
4Inductive charging system for electric vehicle18
5Electric vehicle charging parking structure16
6Inductive charging system for electric vehicle wit…6
7Inductive charging system for electric vehicle4
8Electric vehicle charging parking structure1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of a decline-stage lifecycle, extreme applicant concentration, and a compact but technically coherent prior-art base creates a distinctive risk-reward profile for new entrants and existing players alike.

Decline

Decline stage: annual volume has eased from the 2018 peak

The lifecycle evidence places this field in decline, with annual filings easing back from their 2018 peak and no recorded activity in subsequent years of the evidence window. The foundational inductive-charging claims were staked early, meaning new entrants must either design around existing positions or identify genuinely differentiated technical angles. The absence of recent filings may also reflect market uncertainty about the recreational-vehicle EV segment rather than a solved technology.

Lifecycle: Decline
Concentration

One institutional filer is visible in; individual inventors fill the mid-tier

The top five filers hold 71% of the combined total among the ranked applicants visible in this query, and most of the non-leader positions are occupied by individual inventors rather than competing corporations. This leaves the field with limited institutional diversity, which may indicate either that large incumbents have deprioritized the recreational-vehicle segment or that the market has not yet attracted broad corporate investment. Either reading suggests vulnerability to a well-resourced new entrant with a differentiated approach.

High concentration
Collaboration

Access Business Group is the hub of all recorded co-filing activity

All five documented co-applicant pairs in the evidence involve Access Business Group International LLC paired individually with Weber Richard J, Taylor Joshua B, Stoner Jr William T, Eurich Sean T, and Baarman David W, each pair sharing two records. This hub-and-spoke collaboration pattern suggests the institutional leader has worked closely with a small team of named inventors rather than forming cross-company alliances. No inter-institutional collaboration is recorded, leaving that as an open structural gap.

Hub-and-spoke ecosystem
Geography

UK and US each anchor four records; PCT and EPO routes used sparingly

The United Kingdom and the United States each account for four patent records, with two WIPO (PCT) filings and one EPO filing also on record. The parallel UK-US coverage by the leading applicant suggests a dual-home-market strategy, while limited PCT/EPO use indicates that broad multi-jurisdictional protection was not a priority. Markets outside these jurisdictions — including major EV-growth regions — are effectively uncovered by the existing corpus.

UK & US lead
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
WEBER RICHARD JAccess Business Group International LLC2
TAYLOR JOSHUA BAccess Business Group International LLC2
STONER JR WILLIAM TAccess Business Group International LLC2
EURICH SEAN TAccess Business Group International LLC2
BAARMAN DAVID WAccess Business Group International LLC2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are drawn from applicant ranking, collaboration, lifecycle, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Access Business Group International LLC

Access Business Group International LLC

The top-ranked filer with 6 patent records, Access Business Group built its position on the three core branches of wireless EV charging: B60L (electric vehicle propulsion), H02J (power supply and grid systems), and H01F (magnets, inductors, and transformers), each covered with 8–9 records at the sub-class level. All recorded collaboration in the corpus flows through this entity. Applicant momentum data is not available in the evidence for the recent period.

6 patent records
Challenger · Philips IP Ventures BV

Philips IP Ventures BV

Philips IP Ventures BV ranks second with 3 patent records. Detailed sub-class technology emphasis for Philips is not separately broken out in the current evidence, but its presence in second position within a small corpus indicates meaningful early investment in the space. Applicant momentum data for the recent window is not available in the evidence.

3 patent records
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Access Business Group International LLCPhilips IP Ventures BV+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map the wireless EV charging landscape for your segment?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.