Book a demo

Wireless Power Transfer for Building Energy Patent Landscape

Wireless Power Transfer for Building Energy Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Wireless Power Transfer for Building Energy Patent Landscape in 2026

The wireless power transfer for building energy patent space is extremely narrow, with only 5 patent families on record and Samsung Electronics holding a commanding position. Activity peaked in 2017 and has since eased substantially, indicating a field that remains technically nascent and competitively thin.

5
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··4 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung Electronics dominates a very small, highly concentrated field

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd leads the applicant ranking with 4 patent families, followed distantly by Mailam Engineering College with 1 patent family. Together these two applicants account for the entirety of the top-ranked filers in scope.

Concentration is absolute: the top five filers account for 100% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, and the tier gap between the leader and all others is four-to-one. This degree of concentration in a field of only 5 patent families signals that the space has not attracted meaningful broad industry engagement.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Samsung Electronics Co Ltd4
2Mailam Engineering College1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Samsung’s dominant position reflects focused early-stage exploration rather than an entrenched moat — the small absolute volume means that even modest new filing activity by a new entrant could shift the competitive balance rapidly.

The most recent filing periods are subject to publication lag of approximately 18–24 months, so the apparent absence of recent activity should be interpreted cautiously rather than as a definitive indicator of abandonment.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Sparse, episodic filing history dominated by a single IPC class

The filing trend reveals a thin and intermittent history, while the technology composition is almost entirely concentrated in power supply and grid systems — with only a marginal signal from electric vehicle propulsion.

Annual filing trend

Filings peaked at 2 families in 2017, fell to zero through 2019, recovered briefly to 2 families in 2020, and then returned to zero through 2024, with a single family appearing in 2025. The pattern is episodic rather than directional, and the recent-period absence is consistent with publication lag rather than confirmed cessation.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2 in 2017.22017020180201922020020210202202023020241202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H02J (Power supply and grid systems) accounts for all 5 patent records in the corpus, establishing it as the sole substantive technical route. B60L (Electric vehicle propulsion) appears with 1 record, contributed by Mailam Engineering College, suggesting an exploratory crossover application rather than a distinct parallel route.

Technology compositionH02J · Power supply & grid systems leads with 5; B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion 1.H02J · Power supply & gr…5B60L · Electric vehicle …1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20170373525A1Published 2017-12-28

Voltage generating method and apparatus

Samsung Electronics CO., LTD.

Provided are a voltage generating method and apparatus. A wireless power device includes a boosting circuit configured to generate a high voltage, and a switch arrangement circuit configured to selectively transmit energy to the boosting circuit, for the generating of the high voltage, using an inductor included in a resonator and in response to a build-up… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Voltage generating method and apparatus — patent drawingVoltage generating method and apparatus — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Voltage generating method and apparatus1
2Voltage generating method and apparatus1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D decision-making

A 5-family corpus with one dominant filer, episodic filing history, and a single dominant IPC class provides a clear but cautionary picture: the space is technically real but commercially underdeveloped.

Decline

Decline stage — annual volume has eased from its 2017 peak

The lifecycle evidence places this field in decline, with annual filings easing back from the 2017 peak. The small total volume and multi-year gaps between filings suggest that mainstream R&D investment in this specific intersection — wireless power transfer applied to building energy infrastructure — has not materialized. A new entrant would be entering a field with minimal prior art friction but also limited proven commercial signal.

Lifecycle: Decline
Concentration

Near-total concentration in a single incumbent

Samsung Electronics holds 4 of the 5 patent families in scope, giving it an 80% share of an already minimal corpus. The top five filers collectively account for 100% of the output among the hundred largest filers, which in this case reduces to just two applicants. Any organization entering this space would face Samsung’s existing position in H02J50 and H02J7 but would not be navigating a crowded prior-art landscape.

Concentration: Extreme
Collaboration

No co-applicant activity observed

Evidence pending: no collaboration relationships between co-applicants are recorded in the corpus. Given the extremely small patent population and the presence of only two filers — one a large corporate entity and one an engineering college — the absence of co-filing is expected. Future academic-industry partnerships could serve as an early signal of renewed field interest.

Collaboration: None observed
Geography

US-centric filing with a single India record

Four of the five patent records are filed in the United States, with one filed in India by Mailam Engineering College. The absence of filings in other major innovation jurisdictions — Europe, China, Japan, or Korea — reinforces the nascent and geographically narrow character of this space. Organizations monitoring building-energy wireless power globally should note that IP coverage outside the US is currently uncontested.

Geography: US + India only
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from lifecycle stage, applicant concentration, collaboration, and jurisdiction data in the corpus.Explore insights →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own wireless power transfer landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.