Book a demo

Wireless Power Transfer Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Wireless Power Transfer Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/wireless-power-transfer-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Power Electronics
Wireless power transfer patents: who holds the ground and where claim space is still open
  • 23.6% sits with five companies. The top five assignees account for 3,032 of 12,874 records in scope, with a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants behind them.
  • Filings peaked in 2021 at 1,220. Volume has since eased to 730 in 2024, a 40% decline over that three-year span — the clearest complete-year signal the data supports.
  • Power supply claims dominate, at 58.3%. H02J covers 7,501 of the 12,874 records, far ahead of transmission (H04B, 21.6%) and magnetics (H01F, 11.1%).
Get a prior-art report on your approach
12.9K
Published Records
24%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-40%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1,220 records) with 2024 (730) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 12,874 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset spans 12,874 published records matching wireless, inductive and contactless power transfer claims combined with radio-channel, frequency-band, switching-frequency or power-stage terminology, filed between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off. It captures the overlap between power electronics and wireless signalling that defines modern charging systems — from handset pads to vehicle charging pads to implantable and surgical devices. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be.

The picture that emerges is a field with real concentration at the top — five companies hold close to a quarter of all records — but with most of the remaining claim space spread across a long tail of filers, each with a handful of families. Reading the assignee ranking, the IPC composition and the filing trend together is the fastest way to see which sub-areas are already crowded and which are still open for a first-mover claim.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1LG ELECTRONICS INC1,041
  2. 2NUCURRENT INC706
  3. 3QUALCOMM INC499
  4. 4APPLE INC415
  5. 5SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD371
  6. 6LG INNOTEK CO LTD289
  7. 7WITRICITY AI TECH LLC287
  8. 8KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV229
  9. 9WITRICITY CORP206
  10. 10CANON KK139
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wireless Power Transfer Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Three views of the same 12,874-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those records split across the IPC subclasses that define the technology.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings ran from 1,142 in 2017 to a peak of 1,220 in 2021, then eased to 730 by 2024 — a 40% decline over that three-year window. 2025 and 2026 figures (96 in the most recent year) are still filling in under the usual 18-month publication lag and should not be read as a continuing drop.

Filing trend, 2017–202603757501,1251,5001,14220172018201920201,22020212022202320242025962026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

H02J (power supply and grid systems) anchors the field at 58.3% of the 12,874 records, with H04B transmission claims at 21.6% and magnetics/inductor claims (H01F) at 11.1%. Vehicle-specific claims (B60L, 8.1%) and medical-device claims (A61B, 6.2%) mark the two clearest application verticals layered on top of the core power-transfer art. Records commonly carry more than one class, so these shares sum past 100%.

Technology composition by IPC subclassH02J · Power supply & grid systems7,50158.3%H04B · Transmission (general)2,78421.6%H01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…1,42811.1%H04W · Wireless communication networks1,1358.8%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)1,0578.2%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion1,0458.1%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery8026.2%H04L · Digital information transmissi…6825.3%Other8,47065.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 12,874 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wireless Power Transfer Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Wireless Power Transfer Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about wireless power transfer patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative Filing
US20200287418A12020-09-10

System and method for protecting a wireless power transfer system

BUNKER HILL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

A wireless power transfer system is disclosed. The wireless power transfer system includes a first converting unit configured to convert a first DC voltage of an input power to a first AC voltage. Further, the wireless power transfer system includes a contactless power transfer unit configured to receive the input power having the first AC voltage from the first converting unit and transmit the input power. Also, the wireless power transfer system includes a second converting unit configured to receive the input power from the contactless power transfer unit and convert the first AC voltage of the input power to a second DC voltage.Filed by Bunker Hill Technologies, LLC, published 2020-09-10. Structured around a DC-to-AC-to-DC conversion path either side of a contactless transfer stage, with an explicit protection function layered on top.

US20200287418A1 — patent drawing 1US20200287418A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing in Eureka →
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20080300572A1Wireless monitor for a personal medical device system1,275
2US20120235636A1Systems and methods for providing positioning freedom, and support of different voltages, protocols, and powe…1,197
3US20050192727A1Sensor Assemblies1,180
4US7103460B1System and method for vehicle diagnostics1,177
5US20060025897A1Sensor assemblies1,057
6US20090243397A1Packaging and Details of a Wireless Power device1,024
7US20100327766A1Wireless emergency lighting system996
8US20110133655A1Autonomous grid shifting lighting device934
9US6988026B2Wireless and powerless sensor and interrogator773
10US20220066456A1Obstacle recognition method for autonomous robots763

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations within this corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on the field rather than of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wireless Power Transfer Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Reading concentration, technology mix and citation patterns together points to where claim space is already occupied and where a new filing has room to stand.

Concentration
23.6%
held by top 5 of 12,874 records

The top of the field is dense, the rest is a long tail

Five assignees hold 3,032 of the 12,874 records in scope, and the top ten extend that to 32.5%. Beyond the leaders, the ranked list of 100 companies thins out quickly — most named entities carry only a handful of families, which is where freedom-to-operate work should focus first.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Momentum
-40%
2021 (1,220) to 2024 (730)

Volume has cooled from its 2021 peak, but recent years understate it

The complete-year trend shows a real decline from the 2021 peak to 2024. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete under the normal publication lag, so treat any apparent further drop with caution until those years mature.

Filing trend, complete years only
Technology mix
58.3%
of records carry H02J

Power-stage claims dominate; wireless-network claims are a smaller layer

H02J power supply and grid claims appear in the majority of records, while H04W wireless network claims sit at 8.8% — a much thinner layer than the transmission-general class (H04B, 21.6%). That gap suggests the network-integration side of wireless power is less thoroughly claimed than the core power-conversion side.

IPC composition, 12,874 records
Collaboration
123
strongest co-assignee pairing

Co-filing is rare and narrowly clustered

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest pairing recurs at 123 shared records — a small, tight cluster rather than a broad collaborative network across the field.

Co-assignee pairs, 10 total
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to wireless power transfer patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wireless Power Transfer Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space, and where momentum is shifting

The leader board is concentrated among consumer-electronics and semiconductor names, but recent-year momentum has slowed even at the top — a signal that the easiest core claims have largely been staked.

Leader
1,041
records, top assignee

One company sits well clear of the field

The leading assignee's 1,041 records dwarf the fifth-place total of 371, showing a steep drop-off rather than an even spread among the top names. That gap matters for competitive tracking: the leader's filing choices set the pace the rest of the field reacts to.

Assignee ranking, leader vs. 5th place
Second tier
371 → 139
5th to 10th place

A steep drop from fifth to tenth place

Filing counts fall from 371 at fifth place to 139 at tenth, confirming that concentration is front-loaded into a handful of names rather than spread evenly across the top ten.

Assignee ranking, positions 5–10
Momentum
-73% to -95%
YoY, latest year

Even active filers have pulled back sharply in the latest year

Recent-year filing counts among named leaders are low in absolute terms and down sharply year-on-year across the board. Given the 18-month publication lag, part of this is an artefact of incomplete recent data rather than a genuine full stop in filing activity.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches of the technology with comparatively thin coverage relative to the core power-stage and transmission classes.
wireless-network-integrated power controlsurgical/implantable receiver coil designmulti-protocol switching-frequency negotiationco-located beamforming and power-transfer antennas
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
LG Electronics8-82%
Qualcomm Inc.6-73%
Canon Inc.4-73%
Koninklijke Philips N.V.3-40%
NuCurrent Inc.2-95%
Apple Inc.2-93%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.2-71%
WANG BEIBEI1-75%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wireless Power Transfer Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white-space filing, or competitive tracking.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top ten

With 32.5% of all records held by ten assignees, a targeted clearance search against those names, rather than the full 100-company ranking, covers most of the concentrated risk efficiently.

Run a clearance search in Eureka →

Scope a filing in the under-claimed branches

Network-integrated power control and surgical receiver coil design carry noticeably lower class coverage than the core H02J and H04B claims, making them candidates for a first, defensible claim.

Explore white space in Eureka →

Track momentum, not just headcount

Recent-year filing drops among leading assignees may reflect publication lag as much as a real slowdown; revisit this trend once 2025–2026 data matures before drawing conclusions.

Set up monitoring in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wireless Power Transfer Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about the wireless power transfer patent landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Wireless Power Transfer Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Wireless Power Transfer Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole wireless power transfer patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.