Workover Rig Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Top 5 filers hold 51.3% of the field. 115 of 224 records in scope sit with the five leading assignees, and the top 10 combined reach 69.6% — a genuinely concentrated field, not a long tail dressed up as one.
- Filing has fallen sharply from its 2017 peak. 24 records published in 2017 against 4 in 2021 and 0 in 2024 — a -100% swing over that span, though the most recent one to two years are still filling in as publications lag filing.
- 95.1% of records sit inside one IPC subclass. E21B (earth and rock drilling for wells) carries 213 of 224 records, leaving the eight adjacent subclasses — cranes, jacks, pumps, vehicle mounting — each holding single-digit percentages of claim space.
Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 224 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this dataset covers
Workover rigs and well-servicing equipment sit at the intersection of drilling mechanics and pressure control: the search combines rig- and unit-level terms (workover rig, well servicing unit, snubbing unit) with the specific intervention hardware that makes live-well work possible (snubbing jack, wireline lubricator, wellhead pressure control, tubing retrieval). The result is 224 published records spanning 2015 through mid-2026, concentrated heavily around North American filers and receiving offices.
The field is dominated by oilfield service companies rather than equipment-only manufacturers, and the claim space is narrow: almost every record touches the same core drilling subclass, with the mechanical variety showing up in a handful of much smaller adjacent classes covering lifting, pumping and vehicle-mounted configurations.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 224 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
A peak in 2017, then a steep drop-off
Filings peaked at 24 records in 2017. By 2021 the annual count had fallen to 4, and 2024 — the most recent year that can be treated as complete once publication lag is accounted for — recorded 0, a -100% move over that three-year span. Later years in the chart are still filling in and should not be read as a continued decline until they mature.
One dominant subclass, several thin adjacents
E21B (earth and rock drilling for wells) appears in 95.1% of the 224 records — effectively the default classification for this search. The next most common subclass, B23P (general metal working), appears in only 8.5%, and the remaining classes — foundations, motor vehicles, cranes and hoists, jacks, and both positive- and non-positive-displacement pumps — each sit at 2.7% or below, pointing to mechanical sub-approaches that are claimed far less densely than the core drilling function.
Shares are the percentage of the 224 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Workover Rigs and Well Servicing with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about workover rigs and well servicing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records in this field
Duplex Snubbing Jack
A duplex snubbing jack and method of snubbing pipe into a well bore is disclosed. The duplex snubbing jack includes first and second gripping units that alternately and synchronously grip and release a length of pipe to be attached to a pipe string. The first and second gripping units are synchronously movable upward and downward toward and away from each other to push or pull the pipe through a BOP stack and into or out of a wellbore. Linear actuators are used to synchronously move the first and second gripping units, with guide rails provided to laterally support the pipe as it is pushed or pulled.Filed by Odfjell Partners Invest Ltd., published 2018-03-22 (US20180080291A1).


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6158516A | Combined drilling apparatus and method | 180 |
| 2 | US6367566B1 | Down hole, hydrodynamic well control, blowout prevention | 140 |
| 3 | US6412560B1 | Tubular injector with snubbing jack and oscillator | 94 |
| 4 | US20130343858A1 | Method of deploying a mobile rig system | 90 |
| 5 | US5988274A | Method of and apparatus for inserting pipes and tools into wells | 81 |
| 6 | US5429194A | Method for inserting a wireline inside coiled tubing | 73 |
| 7 | US4710712A | Method and apparatus for measuring defects in ferromagnetic elements | 57 |
| 8 | US20110214920A1 | Universal drilling and completion system | 52 |
| 9 | US20070158073A1 | Fracking multiple casing exit laterals | 49 |
| 10 | US6595297B2 | Method and apparatus for inserting a tubing hanger into a live well | 48 |
Citation counts reflect influence inside the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of historical weight rather than current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three read-throughs from the concentration, trend and classification data above.
Filing sits with a small group of service companies
With 115 of 224 records held by five assignees and 69.6% held by ten, this is not a fragmented field with room for a quiet entrant to build a broad position unnoticed. New filings from outside that group are more likely to be picked up and contested quickly.
Activity has cooled from its 2017 high
Annual filings dropped from 4 in 2021 to 0 in 2024, following a 2017 peak of 24. That is a real slowdown in documented activity, not evidence that the underlying technology has stopped mattering — it may instead mean the mechanical approaches already on file are seen as adequately covered.
Claim density sits almost entirely in one subclass
E21B (earth and rock drilling for wells) captures nearly every record. B23P, the next largest, holds only 8.5%. That imbalance suggests the well-servicing function itself is thoroughly claimed, while the surrounding mechanical implementations — hoisting, jacking, pumping — remain comparatively open.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to workover rigs and well servicing, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL INC | VAUGHAN GARY | 3 |
| CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL INC | RUSUG BJORN | 3 |
| CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL INC | OLSEN BERNT | 3 |
| CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL INC | LAGENDYK RANDALL D | 3 |
| CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL INC | BICKLE HIRAM L | 3 |
| CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL INC | BALLARD JR BERTROM | 3 |
| SMART DRILLING & COMPLETION INC | VAIL WILLIAM BANNING III | 2 |
| SMART DRILLING & COMPLETION INC | SKERI DAMIR S | 1 |
Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, the strongest repeating three times each around a single pressure-control specialist — a sign of a small, stable engineering team rather than a broad industry consortium.
The assignee landscape
Forty-nine companies make up the full ranking returned for this dataset, with activity heavily weighted toward oilfield service providers rather than pure equipment makers.
A single filer leads by a wide margin
The top-ranked assignee holds 28 of the 224 records in scope, roughly double the fifth-place count of 14 — a gap that marks it as the reference point competitors are filing against, whether directly or by working around its claims.
A real second tier, not a cliff
Fifth place holds 14 records and tenth place holds 6 — a gradual taper rather than a sharp drop, suggesting several service companies maintain active, ongoing filing programmes rather than one-off defensive patents.
Collaboration is narrow and specialist-led
The strongest repeating pairs centre on one pressure-control specialist working with named individual inventors, each pairing appearing three times. That points to a small, consistent engineering group rather than joint ventures between competing firms.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC | 1 | — |
| FLUSCHE MARK J | 0 | — |
| SMART DRILLING & COMPLETION INC | 0 | — |
| CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL INC | 0 | — |
| Baker Hughes Holdings LLC | 0 | — |
| VIBRATION TECHNOLOGY LLC | 0 | — |
| SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES NORTH AMERICA SERVICES | 0 | — |
| National Oilwell Varco, L.P. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a concentrated, narrowly classified field with cooling but not disappearing activity. The next steps depend on whether the goal is defensive clearance or offensive filing.
Map claims against the leading assignee
With one filer holding 28 of 224 records and a clear second tier behind it, any new filing in the core E21B space should be checked directly against that leader's claim scope before drafting.
Explore assignee claim scope in EurekaTest the under-claimed adjacent classes
Cranes, jacks, and pump subclasses each hold a few percent of records versus 95.1% for the core drilling class — a first move into a specific mechanical implementation there faces far less prior art density.
Run a white-space search in EurekaWatch for the 2025–2026 lag catching up
The apparent drop to zero in 2024 reflects publication lag as much as real slowdown; re-run the trend query in a future quarter to see whether recent filings surface.
Set a filing alert in EurekaCommon questions on workover rig patents
Within this dataset of 224 published records, one assignee leads with 28 records, well ahead of the fifth-ranked company at 14. The top five assignees combined hold 51.3% of all records in scope, and the top ten hold 69.6%, so the field is concentrated among a small group of established oilfield service companies rather than spread evenly across many small filers. A freedom-to-operate check in this space should start with that leading group before looking at the long tail of single- or double-digit filers.
Documented filings peaked in 2017 at 24 records and have fallen sharply since, with 2021 at 4 records and 2024 — the most recent year that can be treated as reasonably complete — at 0, a -100% swing over that three-year window. Publication typically lags actual filing by about 18 months, so the very latest years in any trend chart are undercounted and should not be read as proof the technology has stopped moving. The safest reading is that documented activity has cooled substantially from its 2017 high, with the most recent trend still uncertain.
The overwhelming majority of records — 95.1% of 224 — fall under IPC subclass E21B, covering earth and rock drilling for wells, which is effectively the default classification for this technology area. Smaller shares fall under B23P (general metal working, 8.5%), and single-digit percentages sit in foundations and earth drilling, motor vehicle mounting, cranes and hoists, jacks and lifting devices, and both positive- and non-positive-displacement pumps. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, these figures add up to more than 100% and should not be treated as a clean breakdown of the whole field.
This filing, assigned to Odfjell Partners Invest Ltd. and published in March 2018, describes a duplex snubbing jack with two gripping units that alternately and synchronously grip and release pipe, moving it through a blowout preventer stack into or out of a wellbore using linear actuators and lateral guide rails. It is a specific mechanical implementation of pipe-stripping technology rather than a claim over snubbing generally. Anyone designing a snubbing jack should check whether their gripping-and-actuation sequence falls inside this synchronized dual-unit approach, since that specific mechanism is the part most likely to be contested.
The clearest opportunities sit outside the dominant E21B drilling classification, in subclasses that each hold only a few percent of the 224 records — crane and hoist integration, jack-assisted lifting mechanisms, vehicle-mounted rig transport, and pump skid configurations for well control. These branches are far less densely claimed than the core intervention function itself, which suggests room for narrowly drafted mechanical improvements rather than broad functional claims. Because overall filing activity has also slowed since 2017, a well-targeted filing in one of these adjacent classes faces comparatively light competition.
Research Workover Rigs and Well Servicing in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole workover rigs and well servicing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.