Book a demo

Workover Rig Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Workover Rig Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/workover-rigs-and-well-servicing-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Workover & Well Integrity
Workover rig and well-servicing patents: concentration, decline and open claim space
  • Top 5 filers hold 51.3% of the field. 115 of 224 records in scope sit with the five leading assignees, and the top 10 combined reach 69.6% — a genuinely concentrated field, not a long tail dressed up as one.
  • Filing has fallen sharply from its 2017 peak. 24 records published in 2017 against 4 in 2021 and 0 in 2024 — a -100% swing over that span, though the most recent one to two years are still filling in as publications lag filing.
  • 95.1% of records sit inside one IPC subclass. E21B (earth and rock drilling for wells) carries 213 of 224 records, leaving the eight adjacent subclasses — cranes, jacks, pumps, vehicle mounting — each holding single-digit percentages of claim space.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
224
Published Records
51%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 224 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this dataset covers

Workover rigs and well-servicing equipment sit at the intersection of drilling mechanics and pressure control: the search combines rig- and unit-level terms (workover rig, well servicing unit, snubbing unit) with the specific intervention hardware that makes live-well work possible (snubbing jack, wireline lubricator, wellhead pressure control, tubing retrieval). The result is 224 published records spanning 2015 through mid-2026, concentrated heavily around North American filers and receiving offices.

The field is dominated by oilfield service companies rather than equipment-only manufacturers, and the claim space is narrow: almost every record touches the same core drilling subclass, with the mechanical variety showing up in a handful of much smaller adjacent classes covering lifting, pumping and vehicle-mounted configurations.

Records by filing year, 2017–2026
  1. 1AXIS ENERGY SERVICES LLC28
  2. 2SMART DRILLING & COMPLETION INC27
  3. 3SPN WELL SERVICES INC24
  4. 4CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL INC22
  5. 5BAKER HUGHES CO14
  6. 6SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES NORTH AMERICA SERVICES11
  7. 7HENRY A BERNAT9
  8. 8NAT OILWELL VARCO LP8
  9. 9BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS LLC7
  10. 10OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Workover Rigs and Well Servicing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 224 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A peak in 2017, then a steep drop-off

Filings peaked at 24 records in 2017. By 2021 the annual count had fallen to 4, and 2024 — the most recent year that can be treated as complete once publication lag is accounted for — recorded 0, a -100% move over that three-year span. Later years in the chart are still filling in and should not be read as a continued decline until they mature.

A peak in 2017, then a steep drop-off061319252420172018201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

One dominant subclass, several thin adjacents

E21B (earth and rock drilling for wells) appears in 95.1% of the 224 records — effectively the default classification for this search. The next most common subclass, B23P (general metal working), appears in only 8.5%, and the remaining classes — foundations, motor vehicles, cranes and hoists, jacks, and both positive- and non-positive-displacement pumps — each sit at 2.7% or below, pointing to mechanical sub-approaches that are claimed far less densely than the core drilling function.

One dominant subclass, several thin adjacentsE21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)21395.1%B23P · Metal working (general)198.5%E02D · Foundations & earth drilling62.7%B62D · Motor vehicles & steering52.2%B66C · Cranes & hoists41.8%B66F · Jacks & lifting devices41.8%F04B · Positive-displacement pumps41.8%F04D · Non-positive-displacement pumps41.8%Other229.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 224 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Workover Rigs and Well Servicing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Workover Rigs and Well Servicing with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about workover rigs and well servicing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this field

Representative Filing
US20180080291A12018-03-22

Duplex Snubbing Jack

ODFJELL PARTNERS INVEST LTD.

A duplex snubbing jack and method of snubbing pipe into a well bore is disclosed. The duplex snubbing jack includes first and second gripping units that alternately and synchronously grip and release a length of pipe to be attached to a pipe string. The first and second gripping units are synchronously movable upward and downward toward and away from each other to push or pull the pipe through a BOP stack and into or out of a wellbore. Linear actuators are used to synchronously move the first and second gripping units, with guide rails provided to laterally support the pipe as it is pushed or pulled.Filed by Odfjell Partners Invest Ltd., published 2018-03-22 (US20180080291A1).

US20180080291A1 — patent drawing 1US20180080291A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6158516ACombined drilling apparatus and method180
2US6367566B1Down hole, hydrodynamic well control, blowout prevention140
3US6412560B1Tubular injector with snubbing jack and oscillator94
4US20130343858A1Method of deploying a mobile rig system90
5US5988274AMethod of and apparatus for inserting pipes and tools into wells81
6US5429194AMethod for inserting a wireline inside coiled tubing73
7US4710712AMethod and apparatus for measuring defects in ferromagnetic elements57
8US20110214920A1Universal drilling and completion system52
9US20070158073A1Fracking multiple casing exit laterals49
10US6595297B2Method and apparatus for inserting a tubing hanger into a live well48

Citation counts reflect influence inside the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of historical weight rather than current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Workover Rigs and Well Servicing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the concentration, trend and classification data above.

Concentration
51.3% of 224
held by the top 5 assignees

Filing sits with a small group of service companies

With 115 of 224 records held by five assignees and 69.6% held by ten, this is not a fragmented field with room for a quiet entrant to build a broad position unnoticed. New filings from outside that group are more likely to be picked up and contested quickly.

Based on the 224-record assignee ranking.
Momentum
-100% (2021→2024)
filing swing over three years

Activity has cooled from its 2017 high

Annual filings dropped from 4 in 2021 to 0 in 2024, following a 2017 peak of 24. That is a real slowdown in documented activity, not evidence that the underlying technology has stopped mattering — it may instead mean the mechanical approaches already on file are seen as adequately covered.

2025 onward is still filling in due to publication lag.
Classification
95.1% in E21B
of 224 records

Claim density sits almost entirely in one subclass

E21B (earth and rock drilling for wells) captures nearly every record. B23P, the next largest, holds only 8.5%. That imbalance suggests the well-servicing function itself is thoroughly claimed, while the surrounding mechanical implementations — hoisting, jacking, pumping — remain comparatively open.

Shares are of all 224 records; a record can carry multiple IPC classes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to workover rigs and well servicing, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Where filings cluster together
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL INCVAUGHAN GARY3
CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL INCRUSUG BJORN3
CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL INCOLSEN BERNT3
CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL INCLAGENDYK RANDALL D3
CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL INCBICKLE HIRAM L3
CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL INCBALLARD JR BERTROM3
SMART DRILLING & COMPLETION INCVAIL WILLIAM BANNING III2
SMART DRILLING & COMPLETION INCSKERI DAMIR S1

Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, the strongest repeating three times each around a single pressure-control specialist — a sign of a small, stable engineering team rather than a broad industry consortium.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Workover Rigs and Well Servicing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

The assignee landscape

Forty-nine companies make up the full ranking returned for this dataset, with activity heavily weighted toward oilfield service providers rather than pure equipment makers.

Leader
28 records
held by the top-ranked assignee

A single filer leads by a wide margin

The top-ranked assignee holds 28 of the 224 records in scope, roughly double the fifth-place count of 14 — a gap that marks it as the reference point competitors are filing against, whether directly or by working around its claims.

Ranking covers 49 companies in total.
Mid-tier
14 to 6 records
fifth through tenth place

A real second tier, not a cliff

Fifth place holds 14 records and tenth place holds 6 — a gradual taper rather than a sharp drop, suggesting several service companies maintain active, ongoing filing programmes rather than one-off defensive patents.

Based on the 49-company assignee ranking.
Pairs
10 co-assignee pairs
across the dataset

Collaboration is narrow and specialist-led

The strongest repeating pairs centre on one pressure-control specialist working with named individual inventors, each pairing appearing three times. That points to a small, consistent engineering group rather than joint ventures between competing firms.

Counted across all 224 records.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
IPC subclasses each holding a small single-digit share of the 224 records — narrower than the dominant drilling classification, and less contested as a result.
Vehicle-mounted rig transport framesCrane and hoist integration for rig-upJack-assisted pipe stripping mechanismsPositive-displacement pump skids for well controlFoundation and site-prep drilling interfaces
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC1
FLUSCHE MARK J0
SMART DRILLING & COMPLETION INC0
CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL INC0
Baker Hughes Holdings LLC0
VIBRATION TECHNOLOGY LLC0
SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES NORTH AMERICA SERVICES0
National Oilwell Varco, L.P.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Workover Rigs and Well Servicing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a concentrated, narrowly classified field with cooling but not disappearing activity. The next steps depend on whether the goal is defensive clearance or offensive filing.

Map claims against the leading assignee

With one filer holding 28 of 224 records and a clear second tier behind it, any new filing in the core E21B space should be checked directly against that leader's claim scope before drafting.

Explore assignee claim scope in Eureka

Test the under-claimed adjacent classes

Cranes, jacks, and pump subclasses each hold a few percent of records versus 95.1% for the core drilling class — a first move into a specific mechanical implementation there faces far less prior art density.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Watch for the 2025–2026 lag catching up

The apparent drop to zero in 2024 reflects publication lag as much as real slowdown; re-run the trend query in a future quarter to see whether recent filings surface.

Set a filing alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Workover Rigs and Well Servicing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on workover rig patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Workover Rigs and Well Servicing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Workover Rigs and Well Servicing in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole workover rigs and well servicing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.