Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (1,723 records) with 2024 (1,230) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 47,253 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape tracks patent activity at the intersection of XR (extended reality) systems and human interface hardware/software — filings that combine media or digital-media XR concepts with codec bitstream handling, frame-rate control, pose tracking, interface devices, audio synthesis or motion tracking. The scope spans 47,253 published records filed or published between 2015 and the August 2026 data cut-off.
The dataset draws on a search string built to catch both the immersive-media side of XR (codec, frame rate, audio synthesis) and the physical interface side (pose tracking, motion tracking, interface devices), so it covers headset and display pipelines as well as the input hardware and sensing layers that sit underneath them.
Two views of the same 47,253-record corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Annual filings rose from 706 in 2017 to a peak of 2,298 in 2022, then declined to 1,230 by 2024 — a 29% drop over that three-year window. 2025 and 2026 figures are undercounted because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months; they should not be read as a genuine slowdown yet.
H04N (pictorial communication) and G06F (electric digital data processing) each cover well over a tenth of all records, showing that most claims still sit in media transport and general-purpose processing rather than in specialised sensing or AI layers. G06N (AI-model computing) and G06Q (business/commerce data processing) trail at 1.6% and 2.0% respectively, marking those as comparatively thin claim territory relative to the core media and processing classes.
Shares are the percentage of the 47,253 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about xr & human interface patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA scrolling device of human interface device and human interface device using the same is disclosed. The scrolling device of human interface device includes a plurality of touch sensing pads and performs scroll operation by sensing contact of at least one of the plurality of touch sensing pads. Thus, it is possible to prevent a mechanical noise and malfunction caused by mechanical abrasion. Further, it is possible to sense upward and downward scroll movement as well as leftward and rightward scroll movement, thus providing still more various scroll information, so that it is possible to make good use of the scrolling device of human interface device.Filed by ATLAB INC., published 2005-12-08 — an early example of touch-pad-based scroll sensing later absorbed into broader interface-device claim sets.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6850252B1 | Intelligent electronic appliance system and method | 4,058 |
| 2 | US6611537B1 | Synchronous network for digital media streams | 2,481 |
| 3 | US6400996B1 | Adaptive pattern recognition based control system and method | 2,342 |
| 4 | US5223844A | Vehicle tracking and security system | 2,163 |
| 5 | US6640145B2 | Media recording device with packet data interface | 1,591 |
| 6 | US5875108A | Ergonomic man-machine interface incorporating adaptive pattern recognition based control system | 1,588 |
| 7 | US20070053513A1 | Intelligent electronic appliance system and method | 1,452 |
| 8 | US6037927A | Method and apparatus for providing force feedback to the user of an interactive computer simulation | 1,415 |
| 9 | US7742036B2 | System and method for controlling haptic devices having multiple operational modes | 1,289 |
| 10 | US6697048B2 | Computer interface apparatus including linkage having flex | 1,276 |
Citation counts favour older filings in any searched corpus — read them as a marker of influence on later filings, not as a signal of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three cuts of the same data — concentration, momentum and claim density — that matter for deciding where to file and where to watch.
Five assignees hold 15,973 of the 47,253 records in scope, and the top ten combined reach 41.2% (19,478 records). That is a narrow band of companies controlling a large share of the claim space, which raises the freedom-to-operate bar for new entrants filing on core pose-tracking or codec claims.
Filings rose steadily from 706 in 2017 to a peak of 2,298 in 2022, then pulled back to 1,230 by 2024. That is the last year the data can be read as complete; 2025-26 numbers will keep rising as publications catch up.
H04N (pictorial communication) and G06F (digital data processing) together account for the bulk of classed records, while G06N (AI-model computing) sits at only 1.6%. That gap suggests AI-driven interface logic is still comparatively underclaimed next to core media transport.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to xr & human interface patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked leaders span device makers, chipmakers and platform software companies. Momentum data shows most top filers pulling back year over year, even as the field stays concentrated.
The leading assignee's record count is more than double the fifth-place figure of 821, and nearly nine times the tenth-place figure of 575 — a steep drop-off rather than a gradual taper.
Every tracked leading assignee shows a steep year-over-year drop in latest-year filings, several down to single digits or zero. Read this alongside the publication lag: it reflects incomplete recent data as much as any real pullback.
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest pair filed jointly far more often than the others tracked. Co-filing is not how most of this field moves — most assignees file solo.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Tencent America LLC | 28 | -91% |
| Canon Inc. | 2 | -95% |
| Xerox International LLC | 2 | -95% |
| Intel Corp | 1 | -75% |
| SK Hynix Inc | 0 | -100% |
| Dell Products LP | 0 | -100% |
| Robert Bosch GmbH | 0 | -100% |
| Immersion Corporation | 0 | — |
This landscape flags where claim density sits and where it thins out. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going deeper on specific branches.
Concentration at the top of this field means a new pose-tracking or codec filing is likely to sit close to existing claims from one of the leading assignees. Run the specific claim language against the dense classes before drafting.
Explore this landscape in EurekaAI-driven interface logic and adaptive codec claims sit well below the density of core media-transport classes today. Watching how fast that gap fills is more useful than a single snapshot.
Set up monitoring in EurekaIt is moderately concentrated: the top five assignees hold 33.8% of the 47,253 records in scope, and the top ten hold 41.2%. That leaves a long tail of assignees outside the ranked group filing smaller volumes, so the field is not a two- or three-player market, but a new entrant should expect to sit close to several large filers' claims in the busiest classes. The gap between the leader (6,520 records) and even the tenth-place assignee (575 records) is steep, which points to a genuine scale advantage rather than a level playing field.
Filings grew from 706 in 2017 to a peak of 2,298 in 2022, then eased to 1,230 by 2024, a 29% decline over that three-year span. That 2024 figure is the most recent year that can be treated as reasonably complete. Because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, the lower counts shown for 2025 and 2026 are undercounts still catching up, not evidence of a further slowdown.
H04N (pictorial communication, largely video/TV transport) covers 15.6% of the 47,253 records, and G06F (electric digital data processing) covers 13.2%, making them the two densest classes in this landscape. Behind them, H04L (digital information transmission), G06T (image data processing) and A61B (diagnosis and surgery) each sit in the low single digits. Because a record can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares add up to more than 100% and should be read as independent overlaps, not as slices of one pie.
The clearest gaps sit next to the dense classes rather than far from them: AI-model computing (G06N) covers only 1.6% of records versus 15.6% for pictorial communication, suggesting AI-driven pose inference and adaptive interface logic are comparatively underclaimed. Sub-areas like haptic feedback synthesis for wearables and cross-device motion-tracking calibration also show thinner filing density than the core codec and display classes. High density elsewhere means those adjacent branches are worth checking before assuming they are open, but the numbers point to comparatively less occupied claim space there.
US20050270275A1, filed by ATLAB INC. and published in 2005, covers a scrolling device for a human interface device that uses multiple touch-sensing pads to detect contact and register scroll movement in more than one direction, specifically to avoid the mechanical wear and noise of physical scroll wheels. It is a narrowly drawn hardware-sensing claim rather than a broad platform claim, so it is unlikely to block software-side gesture recognition or non-touch sensing approaches, but any new filing using multi-pad touch sensing for scroll input should be checked against its specific claim language. Its age also means related continuation or family filings may have narrowed or broadened the original scope since 2005.
Go past this page: query the whole xr & human interface patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.