Zeolite-Anchored Single-Atom Catalysts Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
- Filing has flattened, not grown. Annual filings ran 461 in 2017, peaked at 477 in 2018, and have since declined to single digits by 2026 (partial year), with 2022 sitting at 362.
- No single filer controls the field. The top 5 assignees together hold just 10.0% of all 146,720 records in scope, and the top 10 combined reach only 14.6% — concentration is shallow across a ranked list of 100 companies.
- Claims cluster in catalysis and hydrocarbon processing, not in metal-organic chemistry. B01J (6.4% of records) and C07C (4.5%) dominate; C07F organometallic classes, closer to the single-atom anchoring chemistry itself, sit at just 1.1%.
What this landscape covers
Zeolite-anchored single-atom catalysts sit at the intersection of framework chemistry and applied catalysis: a transition metal or noble metal atom is stabilised within or on a zeolite lattice to combine the site-isolation benefits of single-atom catalysis with the shape selectivity and hydrothermal robustness of a crystalline aluminosilicate host. This dataset spans 146,720 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, searched against language covering confinement effects, hydrothermal stability, framework aluminium siting, anchoring chemistry, and hydrogenation or dehydrogenation performance and regeneration behaviour.
The filing pattern points to a field that built out its core claim space early and has since consolidated rather than expanded. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent years in any trend understate real filing activity — the apparent 2026 drop-off is partly a reporting artefact, not solely a slowdown in research.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 146,720 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses.
A field past its filing peak
Filings rose from 461 in 2017 to a peak of 477 in 2018, held near that level through the early 2020s (362 at the 2022 midpoint), and have fallen sharply into the most recent partial year. This is consistent with a technology whose foundational claims were staked out in the late 2010s, with subsequent activity concentrated on refinement rather than net-new territory.
Catalysis and refining classes dominate, anchoring chemistry lags
B01J (chemical/physical catalytic processes) covers 6.4% of the 146,720 records and C07C (acyclic and carbocyclic compounds) covers 4.5%, reflecting the field's roots in applied hydrocarbon conversion. C07F, the organometallic subclass closest to the actual metal-anchoring chemistry, covers only 1.1% of records — a gap worth checking before assuming the core mechanism is heavily claimed.
Shares are the percentage of the 146,720 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Zeolite-Anchored Single-Atom Catalysts with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about zeolite-anchored single-atom catalysts and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA foundational hydrothermal-stability claim
EP0462598A3 — Transition metal-containing zeolite with high hydrothermal stability
The filing claims a transition metal-containing zeolite defined by a molar oxide composition (aA2O·bM2/nO·Al2O3·cSiO2·dH2O), where A is potassium or caesium and M is a transition metal, together with methods for its preparation and use.Filed by Tosoh Corporation, dated 1992-01-02 — this predates the bulk of the dataset and anchors the hydrothermal-stability claim language that later filings build on.

| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5366504A | Tubular medical prosthesis | 934 |
| 2 | EP0668342A1 | Lubricating base oil preparation process | 852 |
| 3 | US5571139A | Bidirectional suture anchor | 780 |
| 4 | US6165949A | Premium wear resistant lubricant | 713 |
| 5 | US20080281411A1 | Assembly Comprising A Ring For Attachment In A Passage Surrounded By Body Tissue As Well As An Applicator For… | 651 |
| 6 | US6656194B1 | Magnetic anchoring devices | 648 |
| 7 | WO2008132452A2 | Transition metal/zeolite SCR catalysts | 630 |
| 8 | US6037513A | Hydroalkylation of aromatic hydrocarbons | 606 |
| 9 | US5135638A | Wax isomerization using catalyst of specific pore geometry | 603 |
| 10 | US20130143401A1 | Metal and silicon containing capping layers for interconnects | 516 |
Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — treat them as a signal of influence, not of current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers say about the field's shape
Three patterns emerge from the ranking, the IPC distribution and the filing trend together.
Leadership is real but shallow
The top 5 assignees combined hold 10.0% of the 146,720 records in scope, and the top 10 combined reach 14.6%. That leaves the large majority of filings distributed across a ranked list of 100 companies, with a long tail of smaller and single-filing entrants below them.
Activity has cooled from its 2018 peak
Filings peaked at 477 in 2018 and held near 362 by the 2022 midpoint before falling to single digits in the most recent partial year. Recent-year momentum by assignee shows several leading filers at zero or -100% year-on-year, though the newest year is always undercounted due to publication lag.
Process claims outweigh anchoring-chemistry claims
B01J (catalytic processes) accounts for 6.4% of the 146,720 records, more than five times the 1.1% held by C07F, the organometallic subclass most directly tied to single-atom anchoring mechanisms. That gap suggests process and application claims are far more crowded than the underlying coordination chemistry.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to zeolite-anchored single-atom catalysts, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
The ranked leaders are dominated by refining and petrochemical majors, with co-assignee pairs concentrated inside a small number of corporate families rather than spread across cross-industry partnerships.
A refining-industry leader out front
The top-ranked assignee holds 3,941 records, well ahead of fifth place at 2,312 and tenth place at 1,177 — a steep early drop-off followed by a flatter tail typical of a mature, consolidated filing base.
Co-assignee activity stays inside corporate families
Of the 10 identified co-assignee pairs, the strongest links a parent company to its own research institute (88 shared records), and the next strongest links the same parent to a second internal institute (43). This points to internal R&D-to-corporate filing structures rather than external joint ventures.
US and Europe carry the bulk of office filings
The United States receives the largest share of filings at 8,092, ahead of Europe (EPO) at 3,944, the United Kingdom at 2,534, and WIPO/PCT filings at 2,070 — indicating the field's commercial focus remains centred on US and European refining and chemical markets.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec) | 1 | — |
| ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company | 0 | -100% |
| BASF SE | 0 | -100% |
| Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. | 0 | — |
| Mobil Oil Corporation | 0 | — |
| ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc. | 0 | — |
| IFP Energies Nouvelles | 0 | — |
| UOP LLC | 0 | — |
Where to take this next
The dataset points to specific follow-up questions rather than a single conclusion — use Eureka to run them against the full record set.
Check freedom-to-operate against the leading assignee's family
With the top-ranked assignee holding 3,941 records versus a much smaller tenth-place count, its family is the first place to check before filing in core B01J or C07C claim territory.
Run an FTO search in Eureka →Map the C07F organometallic gap
At only 1.1% of records, organometallic anchoring-chemistry claims are comparatively sparse next to process claims — worth a targeted search before assuming this space is occupied.
Explore C07F filings in Eureka →Track whether the 2026 dip is real or a reporting lag
Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the sharp single-digit count in the most recent year is likely understated; re-run the trend once later filings publish.
Set a filing-trend alert in Eureka →Common questions on this landscape
In patent claim language, it typically refers to a formulation or process in which a single metal atom or a small number of isolated metal sites are stabilised within or on a crystalline zeolite framework, often described through molar oxide composition ranges, framework aluminium siting, or confinement-effect language. Claims in this dataset are searched around terms like hydrothermal stability, anchoring, and hydrogenation or dehydrogenation performance. Most filings sit in catalytic-process classifications (B01J) rather than pure materials-chemistry classes, meaning the claimed value usually lies in the catalytic application rather than the synthesis chemistry alone.
The ranked leaders are dominated by refining and petrochemical companies rather than academic or specialty-materials players, consistent with the field's heavy weighting toward B01J and C07C hydrocarbon-processing classes. The top-ranked assignee holds 3,941 records against a ranked list of 100 companies total, but concentration is shallow: the top 5 combined account for only 10.0% of all 146,720 records in scope. That leaves a substantial long tail of smaller filers, so no single company controls the space.
The filing trend suggests it has passed its peak rather than continuing to expand. Annual filings rose from 461 in 2017 to a peak of 477 in 2018, held near that level into the early 2020s, and dropped sharply toward the most recent partial year. Some of that recent drop reflects publication lag of roughly 18 months rather than an actual halt in research, but the multi-year plateau before the drop is a genuine signal of consolidation.
The clearest gap sits around organometallic anchoring chemistry itself: C07F, the IPC subclass most directly tied to metal-anchoring mechanisms, covers only 1.1% of the 146,720 records, versus 6.4% for general catalytic-process claims under B01J. That imbalance suggests process and application claims are comparatively crowded while the underlying coordination and anchoring chemistry is less densely claimed. Framework aluminium-siting control and regeneration-cycle claim language also appear less saturated than the core catalytic-process space.
EP0462598A3 claims a transition metal-containing zeolite defined by a specific molar oxide composition range for high hydrothermal stability, filed by Tosoh Corporation and dated 1992-01-02. It predates the bulk of this dataset and functions as foundational prior art for hydrothermal-stability claim language rather than a currently enforceable barrier in most jurisdictions, given its age. New filings should still check its claim scope carefully when drafting compositional claims that overlap the same oxide-ratio language, since later filings in the dataset often build on or narrow around this framing.
Research Zeolite-Anchored Single-Atom Catalysts in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole zeolite-anchored single-atom catalysts corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.