Book a demo

Zeolite-Anchored Single-Atom Catalysts Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Zeolite-Anchored Single-Atom Catalysts Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/zeolite-anchored-single-atom-catalysts-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Catalysis & Process Chemistry
Zeolite-anchored single-atom catalyst patents: who filed, where the claims sit, and what is still open
  • Filing has flattened, not grown. Annual filings ran 461 in 2017, peaked at 477 in 2018, and have since declined to single digits by 2026 (partial year), with 2022 sitting at 362.
  • No single filer controls the field. The top 5 assignees together hold just 10.0% of all 146,720 records in scope, and the top 10 combined reach only 14.6% — concentration is shallow across a ranked list of 100 companies.
  • Claims cluster in catalysis and hydrocarbon processing, not in metal-organic chemistry. B01J (6.4% of records) and C07C (4.5%) dominate; C07F organometallic classes, closer to the single-atom anchoring chemistry itself, sit at just 1.1%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
146.7K
Published Records
10%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-48%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Zeolite-anchored single-atom catalysts sit at the intersection of framework chemistry and applied catalysis: a transition metal or noble metal atom is stabilised within or on a zeolite lattice to combine the site-isolation benefits of single-atom catalysis with the shape selectivity and hydrothermal robustness of a crystalline aluminosilicate host. This dataset spans 146,720 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, searched against language covering confinement effects, hydrothermal stability, framework aluminium siting, anchoring chemistry, and hydrogenation or dehydrogenation performance and regeneration behaviour.

The filing pattern points to a field that built out its core claim space early and has since consolidated rather than expanded. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent years in any trend understate real filing activity — the apparent 2026 drop-off is partly a reporting artefact, not solely a slowdown in research.

Annual filings, 2017–2026
  1. 1CHINA PETROLEUM & CHEMICAL CORP3,941
  2. 2EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO3,232
  3. 3BASF SE2,903
  4. 4SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV2,328
  5. 5IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES2,312
  6. 6UOP LLC1,901
  7. 7EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC1,261
  8. 8RES INST OF PETROLEUM PROCESSING SINOPEC1,260
  9. 9MOBIL OIL CORP1,179
  10. 10JOHNSON MATTHEY PLC1,177
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite-Anchored Single-Atom Catalysts covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 146,720 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses.

A field past its filing peak

Filings rose from 461 in 2017 to a peak of 477 in 2018, held near that level through the early 2020s (362 at the 2022 midpoint), and have fallen sharply into the most recent partial year. This is consistent with a technology whose foundational claims were staked out in the late 2010s, with subsequent activity concentrated on refinement rather than net-new territory.

A field past its filing peak012525037550046120174772018201920202021202220232024202592026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Catalysis and refining classes dominate, anchoring chemistry lags

B01J (chemical/physical catalytic processes) covers 6.4% of the 146,720 records and C07C (acyclic and carbocyclic compounds) covers 4.5%, reflecting the field's roots in applied hydrocarbon conversion. C07F, the organometallic subclass closest to the actual metal-anchoring chemistry, covers only 1.1% of records — a gap worth checking before assuming the core mechanism is heavily claimed.

Catalysis and refining classes dominate, anchoring chemistry lagsB01J · Chemical/physical processes & …9,3806.4%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds6,6034.5%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining3,5432.4%C07B · General organic chemistry meth…2,4621.7%C07F · Organo-metallic & non-carbon c…1,6011.1%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds1,4701.0%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…1,2360.8%C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)8690.6%Other12,4138.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 146,720 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite-Anchored Single-Atom Catalysts covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Zeolite-Anchored Single-Atom Catalysts with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about zeolite-anchored single-atom catalysts and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

A foundational hydrothermal-stability claim

Representative filing
EP0462598A31992-01-02

EP0462598A3 — Transition metal-containing zeolite with high hydrothermal stability

TOSOH CORPORATION

The filing claims a transition metal-containing zeolite defined by a molar oxide composition (aA2O·bM2/nO·Al2O3·cSiO2·dH2O), where A is potassium or caesium and M is a transition metal, together with methods for its preparation and use.Filed by Tosoh Corporation, dated 1992-01-02 — this predates the bulk of the dataset and anchors the hydrothermal-stability claim language that later filings build on.

EP0462598A3 — patent drawing 1
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5366504ATubular medical prosthesis934
2EP0668342A1Lubricating base oil preparation process852
3US5571139ABidirectional suture anchor780
4US6165949APremium wear resistant lubricant713
5US20080281411A1Assembly Comprising A Ring For Attachment In A Passage Surrounded By Body Tissue As Well As An Applicator For…651
6US6656194B1Magnetic anchoring devices648
7WO2008132452A2Transition metal/zeolite SCR catalysts630
8US6037513AHydroalkylation of aromatic hydrocarbons606
9US5135638AWax isomerization using catalyst of specific pore geometry603
10US20130143401A1Metal and silicon containing capping layers for interconnects516

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — treat them as a signal of influence, not of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite-Anchored Single-Atom Catalysts covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about the field's shape

Three patterns emerge from the ranking, the IPC distribution and the filing trend together.

Concentration
10.0% / 14.6%
top 5 / top 10 share of all records

Leadership is real but shallow

The top 5 assignees combined hold 10.0% of the 146,720 records in scope, and the top 10 combined reach 14.6%. That leaves the large majority of filings distributed across a ranked list of 100 companies, with a long tail of smaller and single-filing entrants below them.

Ranking basis: 100 companies, counted in records.
Momentum
477 → single digits
peak year vs. 2026 (partial)

Activity has cooled from its 2018 peak

Filings peaked at 477 in 2018 and held near 362 by the 2022 midpoint before falling to single digits in the most recent partial year. Recent-year momentum by assignee shows several leading filers at zero or -100% year-on-year, though the newest year is always undercounted due to publication lag.

Trend basis: annual filing counts, 2017-2026.
Technology mix
6.4% vs 1.1%
B01J share vs C07F share of records

Process claims outweigh anchoring-chemistry claims

B01J (catalytic processes) accounts for 6.4% of the 146,720 records, more than five times the 1.1% held by C07F, the organometallic subclass most directly tied to single-atom anchoring mechanisms. That gap suggests process and application claims are far more crowded than the underlying coordination chemistry.

Class shares sum to more than 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to zeolite-anchored single-atom catalysts, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite-Anchored Single-Atom Catalysts covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked leaders are dominated by refining and petrochemical majors, with co-assignee pairs concentrated inside a small number of corporate families rather than spread across cross-industry partnerships.

Leader
3,941
records, top-ranked assignee

A refining-industry leader out front

The top-ranked assignee holds 3,941 records, well ahead of fifth place at 2,312 and tenth place at 1,177 — a steep early drop-off followed by a flatter tail typical of a mature, consolidated filing base.

Basis: assignee ranking, 100 companies.
Co-filing
88
strongest co-assignee pair

Co-assignee activity stays inside corporate families

Of the 10 identified co-assignee pairs, the strongest links a parent company to its own research institute (88 shared records), and the next strongest links the same parent to a second internal institute (43). This points to internal R&D-to-corporate filing structures rather than external joint ventures.

Basis: 10 co-assignee pairs identified in scope.
Geography
8,092
United States receiving-office filings

US and Europe carry the bulk of office filings

The United States receives the largest share of filings at 8,092, ahead of Europe (EPO) at 3,944, the United Kingdom at 2,534, and WIPO/PCT filings at 2,070 — indicating the field's commercial focus remains centred on US and European refining and chemical markets.

Basis: receiving-office counts across six jurisdictions tracked.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas sit adjacent to the dense B01J/C07C core but are not where the bulk of claim density has accumulated.
Framework Al-siting control methodsRegeneration-cycle claim languageOrganometallic anchoring precursors (C07F-adjacent)Non-noble-metal single-site stabilisationConfinement-effect characterisation claims
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec)1
ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Company0-100%
BASF SE0-100%
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V.0
Mobil Oil Corporation0
ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc.0
IFP Energies Nouvelles0
UOP LLC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite-Anchored Single-Atom Catalysts covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific follow-up questions rather than a single conclusion — use Eureka to run them against the full record set.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leading assignee's family

With the top-ranked assignee holding 3,941 records versus a much smaller tenth-place count, its family is the first place to check before filing in core B01J or C07C claim territory.

Run an FTO search in Eureka →

Map the C07F organometallic gap

At only 1.1% of records, organometallic anchoring-chemistry claims are comparatively sparse next to process claims — worth a targeted search before assuming this space is occupied.

Explore C07F filings in Eureka →

Track whether the 2026 dip is real or a reporting lag

Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the sharp single-digit count in the most recent year is likely understated; re-run the trend once later filings publish.

Set a filing-trend alert in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite-Anchored Single-Atom Catalysts covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite-Anchored Single-Atom Catalysts covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Zeolite-Anchored Single-Atom Catalysts in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole zeolite-anchored single-atom catalysts corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.