Book a demo

Zeolite Catalyst Design Patent Landscape 2026

Zeolite Catalyst Design Patent Landscape 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/zeolite-catalyst-catalyst-design-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Chemical & Process Engineering
Zeolite Catalyst Design Patent Landscape 2026
  • 478 filings in 2017 down to a 2022 midpoint of 351, a filing curve that has been flat-to-declining for most of the last decade rather than accelerating.
  • B01J carries 7,465 of 8,699 records, while C07D heterocyclic overlap sits at just 164 — claim space outside core catalysis IPCs is comparatively open.
  • Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across the whole set, and the strongest one links a national oil company to a catalyst-chemical specialist rather than to another oil major.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
8,699
Published Records
37%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-45%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (357 records) with 2024 (198) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 8,699 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families filed against zeolite framework, acid-site engineering, hierarchical zeolite and metal-loaded zeolite claim language, scoped to IPC classes B01J29, C01B39 and B01J29/40. It captures catalyst composition, synthesis route and post-treatment claims rather than downstream reactor or process-integration filings that merely reference a zeolite catalyst in passing.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off. Because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in any trend view understate actual filing activity for those years and should be read as provisional.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC1,185
  2. 2CHEVRON USA INC716
  3. 3JOHNSON MATTHEY PLC494
  4. 4UOP LLC421
  5. 5SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO420
  6. 6MOBIL OIL CORP341
  7. 7IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES318
  8. 8EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO305
  9. 9MITSUBISHI CHEM CORP252
  10. 10TOSOH CORP217
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Catalyst Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 8,699-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

Filings peaked in 2017 and have not recovered

478 filings in 2017 remains the peak year on record. The 2022 midpoint of 351 sits well below that peak, and the count falls further toward the 2026 cut-off — consistent with a maturing claim space rather than a growing one.

Filings peaked in 2017 and have not recovered0125250375500478201720182019202020212022202320242025142026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Catalysis and inorganic-chemistry classes dominate

B01J (7,465) and C01B (4,143) anchor the corpus, with C07C hydrocarbon-conversion claims (2,745) and C10G refining claims (1,999) close behind. F01N exhaust treatment (468) and C07D heterocyclics (164) are the thinnest overlaps, marking where zeolite catalyst claims rarely reach today.

Catalysis and inorganic-chemistry classes dominateB01J · Chemical/physical processes & …7,46585.8%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…4,14347.6%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds2,74531.6%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining1,99923.0%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…1,61318.5%C07B · General organic chemistry meth…5065.8%F01N · Exhaust silencers & treatment4685.4%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds1641.9%Other8619.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 8,699 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Catalyst Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Zeolite Catalyst Catalyst Design with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about zeolite catalyst catalyst design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The prior art anchoring this space

Representative Filing
US20190030519A12019-01-31

Hierarchical zeolite catalyst for C5–C9 alkane aromatization

PTT GLOBAL CHEMICAL PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED

A process for preparing a hierarchical zeolite catalyst for aromatization of C5-C9 alkane that provides high conversion percentage of precursor to yields and high aromatics selectivity, built through a soft-template hydrothermal route followed by contacting steps to form the hierarchical pore structure.Filed by PTT Global Chemical Public Company Limited, published 2019-01-31.

US20190030519A1 — patent drawing 1US20190030519A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4499327AProduction of light olefins1,064
2WO2008132452A2Transition metal/zeolite SCR catalysts630
3US5075269AProduction of high viscosity index lubricating oil stock534
4US4503023ASilicon substituted zeolite compositions and process for preparing same529
5US4677242AProduction of light olefins416
6US3894104AAromatization of hetero-atom substituted hydrocarbons410
7US4076761AProcess for the manufacture of gasoline405
8US4138442AProcess for the manufacture of gasoline352
9US4897178AHydrocracking catalyst and hydrocracking process331
10US3911041AConversion of methanol and dimethyl ether318

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings; treat this as a map of foundational influence, not of current commercial weight.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Catalyst Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about where this field stands

Read together, the trend, the IPC spread and the citation table point to a claim space that was built out heavily in the mid-2010s and has since been defended rather than expanded.

Filing Momentum
478 → 14
2017 peak vs 2026 partial

The growth phase is behind this field

Filings ran at 478 in the 2017 peak year and the 2022 midpoint had already fallen to 351. Even allowing for the publication lag depressing the most recent years, the multi-year decline predates the reporting window's tail end.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Claim Concentration
7,465 of 8,699
records touching B01J

Core catalysis claims are dense; adjacent classes are not

B01J carries the overwhelming majority of records. C07D heterocyclic overlap (164) and F01N exhaust treatment (468) remain comparatively lightly claimed, suggesting less crowded space at the edges of the core chemistry.

IPC subclass distribution
Collaboration Pattern
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships identified

Collaboration is rare and concentrated around one filer

Only ten co-assignee pairs exist across the entire corpus, and the three strongest all include the same national oil company partnering separately with a catalyst-chemical maker, a university and an internal services affiliate.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to zeolite catalyst catalyst design, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Collaboration is the exception, not the norm
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)JGC Catalysts and Chemicals Ltd.118
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)102
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)Saudi Aramco Services Company62
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals58
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.The Regents of the University of California41
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)Japan Cooperation Center, Petroleum (JCCP)40
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)JAPAN COOP CENT FOR PETROLEUM & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY38
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)JAPAN COOPERATION CENT25

With just 10 identified co-assignee pairs against 8,699 families, most zeolite catalyst design work in this corpus is filed solo rather than jointly.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Catalyst Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is active, and who has slowed down

Recent-year momentum figures show broad deceleration across the named assignees, with year-on-year drops of 60–90% common even among historically active filers.

Momentum Watch
-93% YoY
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)

The most active historical filer has pulled back sharply

Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco) shows only 1 filing in the latest year against a 93% year-on-year decline, despite anchoring the strongest co-assignee pairs in the dataset with JGC Catalysts and Chemicals Ltd. and King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST).

Recent-year momentum
Momentum Watch
0% YoY
BASF SE

One filer is holding steady rather than retreating

BASF SE is the only named assignee showing flat (0%) year-on-year movement in the latest year, at 1 filing — a contrast to the double-digit percentage declines recorded elsewhere in the same cohort.

Recent-year momentum
Filing Pattern
1,064 citations
US4499327A

Foundational light-olefins art still sets the reference point

The most-cited record in the corpus, US4499327A on light olefin production, remains a citation anchor decades on — a reminder that influence in this dataset skews toward earlier, foundational compositions rather than recent filings.

Most-cited records
🔍
Sub-areas with comparatively thin claim coverage
Based on IPC overlap gaps and the low co-filing count, these branches carry less occupied claim space than the core B01J/C01B combination.
Heterocyclic-compatible zeolite frameworks (C07D overlap)Exhaust-integrated hierarchical zeolite (F01N overlap)Mesopore-templated acid-site tuningMulti-metal loaded framework stabilityNon-oil-major co-assignee collaboration structures
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.1-92%
Johnson Matthey Plc (UK)1-83%
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)1-93%
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company1-67%
BASF SE10%
ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc.0
UOP LLC0-100%
Mobil Oil Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Catalyst Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and composition data point to a mature but not closed claim space. Two directions make sense from here.

Map the hierarchical zeolite sub-branch in detail

Hierarchical zeolite claims sit at the intersection of thin IPC overlaps (C07D, F01N) and the representative filing highlighted above. A focused family-level review of this sub-branch would clarify how much of the white space in the gate chips is genuinely open versus simply unindexed.

Explore hierarchical zeolite claims in Eureka

Track the momentum reversal, if any

Every named assignee in the recent-year table shows flat or negative year-on-year movement. Re-running this view after the next publication cycle will show whether the 2025–2026 dip is a lag artefact or an actual pullback from the field.

Set up a filing-momentum watch in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Catalyst Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about zeolite catalyst design patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Catalyst Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Zeolite Catalyst Catalyst Design in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole zeolite catalyst catalyst design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.