Zeolite Catalyst Design Patent Landscape 2026
- 478 filings in 2017 down to a 2022 midpoint of 351, a filing curve that has been flat-to-declining for most of the last decade rather than accelerating.
- B01J carries 7,465 of 8,699 records, while C07D heterocyclic overlap sits at just 164 — claim space outside core catalysis IPCs is comparatively open.
- Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across the whole set, and the strongest one links a national oil company to a catalyst-chemical specialist rather than to another oil major.
Filing growth compares 2021 (357 records) with 2024 (198) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 8,699 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This landscape tracks patent families filed against zeolite framework, acid-site engineering, hierarchical zeolite and metal-loaded zeolite claim language, scoped to IPC classes B01J29, C01B39 and B01J29/40. It captures catalyst composition, synthesis route and post-treatment claims rather than downstream reactor or process-integration filings that merely reference a zeolite catalyst in passing.
Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off. Because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in any trend view understate actual filing activity for those years and should be read as provisional.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 8,699-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.
Filings peaked in 2017 and have not recovered
478 filings in 2017 remains the peak year on record. The 2022 midpoint of 351 sits well below that peak, and the count falls further toward the 2026 cut-off — consistent with a maturing claim space rather than a growing one.
Catalysis and inorganic-chemistry classes dominate
B01J (7,465) and C01B (4,143) anchor the corpus, with C07C hydrocarbon-conversion claims (2,745) and C10G refining claims (1,999) close behind. F01N exhaust treatment (468) and C07D heterocyclics (164) are the thinnest overlaps, marking where zeolite catalyst claims rarely reach today.
Shares are the percentage of the 8,699 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Zeolite Catalyst Catalyst Design with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about zeolite catalyst catalyst design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe prior art anchoring this space
Hierarchical zeolite catalyst for C5–C9 alkane aromatization
A process for preparing a hierarchical zeolite catalyst for aromatization of C5-C9 alkane that provides high conversion percentage of precursor to yields and high aromatics selectivity, built through a soft-template hydrothermal route followed by contacting steps to form the hierarchical pore structure.Filed by PTT Global Chemical Public Company Limited, published 2019-01-31.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4499327A | Production of light olefins | 1,064 |
| 2 | WO2008132452A2 | Transition metal/zeolite SCR catalysts | 630 |
| 3 | US5075269A | Production of high viscosity index lubricating oil stock | 534 |
| 4 | US4503023A | Silicon substituted zeolite compositions and process for preparing same | 529 |
| 5 | US4677242A | Production of light olefins | 416 |
| 6 | US3894104A | Aromatization of hetero-atom substituted hydrocarbons | 410 |
| 7 | US4076761A | Process for the manufacture of gasoline | 405 |
| 8 | US4138442A | Process for the manufacture of gasoline | 352 |
| 9 | US4897178A | Hydrocracking catalyst and hydrocracking process | 331 |
| 10 | US3911041A | Conversion of methanol and dimethyl ether | 318 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings; treat this as a map of foundational influence, not of current commercial weight.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers say about where this field stands
Read together, the trend, the IPC spread and the citation table point to a claim space that was built out heavily in the mid-2010s and has since been defended rather than expanded.
The growth phase is behind this field
Filings ran at 478 in the 2017 peak year and the 2022 midpoint had already fallen to 351. Even allowing for the publication lag depressing the most recent years, the multi-year decline predates the reporting window's tail end.
Core catalysis claims are dense; adjacent classes are not
B01J carries the overwhelming majority of records. C07D heterocyclic overlap (164) and F01N exhaust treatment (468) remain comparatively lightly claimed, suggesting less crowded space at the edges of the core chemistry.
Collaboration is rare and concentrated around one filer
Only ten co-assignee pairs exist across the entire corpus, and the three strongest all include the same national oil company partnering separately with a catalyst-chemical maker, a university and an internal services affiliate.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to zeolite catalyst catalyst design, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco) | JGC Catalysts and Chemicals Ltd. | 118 |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco) | King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) | 102 |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco) | Saudi Aramco Services Company | 62 |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco) | King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals | 58 |
| Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | The Regents of the University of California | 41 |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco) | Japan Cooperation Center, Petroleum (JCCP) | 40 |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco) | JAPAN COOP CENT FOR PETROLEUM & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY | 38 |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco) | JAPAN COOPERATION CENT | 25 |
With just 10 identified co-assignee pairs against 8,699 families, most zeolite catalyst design work in this corpus is filed solo rather than jointly.
Who is active, and who has slowed down
Recent-year momentum figures show broad deceleration across the named assignees, with year-on-year drops of 60–90% common even among historically active filers.
The most active historical filer has pulled back sharply
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco) shows only 1 filing in the latest year against a 93% year-on-year decline, despite anchoring the strongest co-assignee pairs in the dataset with JGC Catalysts and Chemicals Ltd. and King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST).
One filer is holding steady rather than retreating
BASF SE is the only named assignee showing flat (0%) year-on-year movement in the latest year, at 1 filing — a contrast to the double-digit percentage declines recorded elsewhere in the same cohort.
Foundational light-olefins art still sets the reference point
The most-cited record in the corpus, US4499327A on light olefin production, remains a citation anchor decades on — a reminder that influence in this dataset skews toward earlier, foundational compositions rather than recent filings.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | 1 | -92% |
| Johnson Matthey Plc (UK) | 1 | -83% |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco) | 1 | -93% |
| ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | 1 | -67% |
| BASF SE | 1 | 0% |
| ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc. | 0 | — |
| UOP LLC | 0 | -100% |
| Mobil Oil Corporation | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The trend and composition data point to a mature but not closed claim space. Two directions make sense from here.
Map the hierarchical zeolite sub-branch in detail
Hierarchical zeolite claims sit at the intersection of thin IPC overlaps (C07D, F01N) and the representative filing highlighted above. A focused family-level review of this sub-branch would clarify how much of the white space in the gate chips is genuinely open versus simply unindexed.
Explore hierarchical zeolite claims in EurekaTrack the momentum reversal, if any
Every named assignee in the recent-year table shows flat or negative year-on-year movement. Re-running this view after the next publication cycle will show whether the 2025–2026 dip is a lag artefact or an actual pullback from the field.
Set up a filing-momentum watch in EurekaCommon questions about zeolite catalyst design patents
This landscape identifies 8,699 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, scoped to IPC classes B01J29, C01B39 and B01J29/40 and to claim language covering zeolite framework, acid-site engineering, hierarchical zeolite and metal-loaded zeolite designs. That figure counts families rather than raw document counts, which neutralises the effect of continuations and multi-jurisdiction re-filing of the same invention. It should be read as the size of the claim space for catalyst composition and synthesis, not the broader universe of patents that merely mention a zeolite catalyst in a process claim.
Filing activity has declined since a 2017 peak of 478 records, falling to a 2022 midpoint of 351 and continuing lower toward the 2026 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, the final one to two years of any trend chart will always look thinner than the true filing rate — but the multi-year decline visible well before that lag window suggests this is a real slowdown, not just a reporting artefact. Recent-year momentum figures for individual assignees, most of which show double-digit percentage declines, reinforce the same picture.
B01J (chemical and physical processes, catalysis) dominates with 7,465 of 8,699 records, followed by C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds) at 4,143. C07C (acyclic and carbocyclic compounds) and C10G (hydrocarbon oil refining) follow at 2,745 and 1,999 respectively. The thinnest overlaps are F01N (exhaust treatment, 468) and C07D (heterocyclic compounds, 164), which is where claim density is lowest relative to the core catalysis classes.
The named assignees in the recent-year momentum data include major energy and catalyst companies, but nearly all show flat or sharply negative year-on-year filing movement in the latest year — for example a 93% decline for one national oil company and declines in the 60–90% range for several others. Only one named assignee shows a flat, 0% year-on-year change rather than a decline. The strongest collaborative relationships, measured by co-assignee pairs, link a national oil company to a catalyst-chemical maker and a university rather than to a rival oil major, and only 10 such pairs exist across the entire corpus.
The IPC composition data points to comparatively thin claim coverage in heterocyclic-compatible zeolite frameworks (C07D overlap, 164 records) and exhaust-integrated hierarchical zeolite designs (F01N overlap, 468 records), both well below the core B01J and C01B classes. The near-absence of co-filing — only 10 co-assignee pairs across 8,699 families — also suggests collaborative structures involving non-oil-major partners are underused as a filing strategy. Neither observation proves the technology is unworkable there; it means the claim space is less occupied and worth a closer freedom-to-operate check before assuming it is blocked.
Research Zeolite Catalyst Catalyst Design in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole zeolite catalyst catalyst design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.