Zeolite Catalyst Design Patent Landscape 2026
Zeolite catalyst design is a mature, oil-major-dominated field with 4,590 patent families in scope, where Mobil Oil Corp holds a commanding lead built over decades of foundational work. Annual filing volume peaked in 2017 and has eased substantially since, signalling a field in late-stage consolidation rather than active expansion.
Mobil Oil Corp leads a highly concentrated field anchored by integrated energy majors
Mobil Oil Corp ranks first with 2,131 patent records, nearly double the second-ranked ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc at 985 — a gap that reflects decades of foundational zeolite synthesis and catalytic cracking work accumulated before the ExxonMobil merger era.
The top five filers — Mobil Oil Corp, ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc, Chevron USA Inc, UOP LLC, and Johnson Matthey PLC — collectively account for 37% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, a level of concentration that leaves limited room for newcomers to challenge on volume alone.
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mobil Oil Corp | 2,131 | |
| 2 | ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc | 985 | |
| 3 | Chevron USA Inc | 868 | |
| 4 | UOP LLC | 809 | |
| 5 | Johnson Matthey PLC | 666 | |
| 6 | Saudi Arabian Oil Co | 632 | |
| 7 | IFP Energies Nouvelles | 583 | |
| 8 | EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO | 522 | |
| 9 | WR GRACE & CO CONN | 378 | |
| 10 | Tosoh Corp | 309 |
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV | 296 | |
| 12 | Saudi Basic Industries Corp | 296 | |
| 13 | Mitsubishi Chemical Corp | 290 | |
| 14 | UMICORE AG & CO KG | 202 | |
| 15 | LyondellBasell Chemical Technology LP | 185 | |
| 16 | BASF Mobile Emissions Catalysts LLC | 178 | |
| 17 | CHINA PETROLEUM & CHEMICAL CORP | 174 | |
| 18 | MITSUI MINING & SMELTING CO LTD | 169 | |
| 19 | JGC CATALYSTS & CHEMICALS LTD | 163 | |
| 20 | Phillips Petroleum Co | 151 |
The dominance of integrated refiners and catalyst specialists in the top tier implies that competitive differentiation increasingly depends on specific zeolite frameworks, emission-control formulations, and process integration rather than broad portfolio breadth.
Filing data for the most recent 18–24 months is subject to publication lag and will undercount actual activity; trend readings for 2024–2026 should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.
Filing volume has eased from a 2017 peak; catalysis and refining dominate the technology mix
The annual trend chart shows a field that peaked at 729 patent records in 2017 and has moderated steadily since, while the technology composition chart reveals that B01J (catalysis) and C10G (hydrocarbon refining) anchor the corpus alongside zeolite synthesis (C01B) and organic chemistry (C07C).
Annual filing trend
Activity peaked in 2017 at 729 records and declined to 491 by 2021, with a partial recovery to 527 in 2022 before continuing lower. Figures for 2024 onward reflect publication lag and should not be read as the final count for those years.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaTechnology composition
B01J (chemical/physical processes and catalysis) dominates by a wide margin, followed by C01B (zeolite synthesis), C07C (acyclic and carbocyclic compounds relevant to petrochemical conversion), and C10G (hydrocarbon oil refining). Lower-volume branches such as F01N (exhaust treatment), C07D (heterocyclic compounds), and B01D (separation processes) reveal adjacent application spaces receiving comparatively sparse coverage.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaHighly cited patent families surfaced by the query
Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.
Process for preparing a hierarchical zeolite catal…
A process for preparing a hierarchical zeolite catalyst for aromatization of C5-C9 alkane that provides high conversion percentage of precursor to yields and high aromatics selectivity, wherein said process comprises the following steps: <ul class="uspto-list"><li class="uspto-list-item"><ul class="uspto-list"><li class="uspto-list-item">(a) preparing a… (excerpt from the patent abstract)
| # | Patent | Citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crystalline zeolite y | 1,616 |
| 2 | Catalytic composition of a crystalline zeolite | 1,551 |
| 3 | Crystalline zeolite ZSM-23 and synthesis thereof | 1,481 |
| 4 | Crystalline zeolite and method of preparing same | 1,395 |
| 5 | Crystalline aluminosilicate PSH-3 and its process … | 1,368 |
| 6 | Alkylation in presence of thermally modified cryst… | 1,176 |
| 7 | Improved processes for making alkylbenzenesulfonat… | 937 |
| 8 | Cleaning products comprising improved alkylarylsul… | 929 |
Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.
What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions
A mature, concentrated field dominated by refining majors creates distinct implications for new entrants, niche specialists, and academic-industry collaborators. The four lenses below synthesise the key signals.
Decline stage: annual volume has eased from a 2017 peak
The lifecycle evidence places zeolite catalyst design in decline, with annual filings down 28% in the recent window relative to the prior period and the 2017 peak of 729 records not recovered. For R&D teams, this signals that broad-scope zeolite patents are increasingly difficult to obtain; investment is better targeted at narrow, application-specific claims in under-served branches or novel framework types where the prior-art density is lower.
Lifecycle: DeclineTop five hold 37% of the hundred largest filers’ volume
The five largest filers — Mobil Oil Corp, ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc, Chevron USA Inc, UOP LLC, and Johnson Matthey PLC — command a 37% share among the top 100, with Mobil Oil Corp’s 2,131 records alone exceeding the next two ranked players combined. This concentration means that challenging leaders on core fluid catalytic cracking or aluminosilicate synthesis IP carries substantial freedom-to-operate risk; entrants should map claims carefully before investing in overlapping technical routes.
High concentrationSaudi Aramco drives the most active co-filing network
Saudi Arabian Oil Co is the hub of the most active collaboration pairs in this corpus: its strongest links are with JGC Catalysts & Chemicals Ltd (136 co-filings), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (114), and Aramco Services Co (103). BASF SE and Dow Global Technologies LLC form another notable pair (86 co-filings), while Chevron USA Inc and the Regents of the University of California have co-filed 67 times. These alliances suggest that R&D partnerships combining national oil companies with specialised catalyst suppliers or academic institutions are a proven model in this space.
Collaboration hubsUS-filed, globally prosecuted: Asia and the Middle East gaining ground
The United States is the leading filing jurisdiction with 4,950 patent records, followed by Europe (EPO) at 3,441 and WIPO (PCT) at 1,617. Japan and Canada each exceed 1,000 records, while China and India are growing prosecution destinations at 833 and 818 respectively. The strong presence in Singapore and Australia reflects refinery-adjacent markets. The rise of Middle Eastern applicants and Asian jurisdictions signals a geographic diversification worth monitoring for freedom-to-operate planning.
US-led, diversifyingGo beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.
| Applicant | Collaborator | Co-filings |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabian Oil Co | JGC Catalysts & Chemicals Ltd | 136 |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Co | King Abdullah University of Science and Technology | 114 |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Co | Aramco Services Co | 103 |
| BASF SE | Dow Global Technologies LLC | 86 |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Co | King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals | 68 |
| Chevron USA Inc | Regents of the University of California | 67 |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Co | Japan Cooperation Centre for Petroleum and Sustainable Energy | 45 |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Co | JAPAN COOP CENT FOR PETROLEUM & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY | 41 |
| Mobil Oil Corp | WR Grace & Co Conn | 32 |
| BASF Mobile Emissions Catalysts LLC | BASF SE | 19 |
Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.
Mobil Oil Corp leads on volume; Saudi Arabian Oil Co shows the strongest recent momentum
The leader tier is defined by heritage refining portfolios, but recent momentum data reveals a shift: Saudi Arabian Oil Co is the only top-five applicant posting positive recent-period growth, while ExxonMobil and UOP entities are contracting sharply.
Mobil Oil Corp
Mobil Oil Corp holds 2,131 patent records — the largest portfolio in this corpus — concentrated in B01J (catalysis, 2,080 records), C07C (acyclic and carbocyclic chemistry, 689), and C07C alkane conversion (631). This reflects a foundational position in zeolite framework synthesis and catalytic cracking built across decades. As a legacy entity whose active filing has been absorbed into the ExxonMobil family, its portfolio represents prior art depth rather than current filing momentum.
patent records: 2131Saudi Arabian Oil Co
Saudi Arabian Oil Co ranks sixth overall with 632 patent records and is the standout for recent momentum at +7% versus the prior period — the strongest positive trend among the top eight active filers tracked. Its technical emphasis spans B01J catalysis (544 records), B01J catalyst preparation (281), and C01B zeolite synthesis (273), with an unusually broad collaboration network anchored by co-filings with JGC Catalysts & Chemicals Ltd, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, and Aramco Services Co.
patent records: 632| Applicant | Recent (3 yrs) | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc | 22 | ▼ -51% |
| Chevron USA Inc | 68 | ▼ -26% |
| UOP LLC | 19 | ▼ -54% |
| Johnson Matthey PLC | 102 | ▬ +4% |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Co | 236 | ▲ +7% |
| IFP Energies Nouvelles | 48 | ▲ +109% |
| ExxonMobil Technology & Engineering Co | 30 | ▼ -64% |
| BASF Mobile Emissions Catalysts LLC | 99 | ▼ -29% |
Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant catalysis core
Four IPC branches appear in the white-space analysis with lower relative share than the dominant B01J core. Two carry plausible technical value and realistic entry paths for teams willing to invest in application-specific zeolite work.
F01N · Exhaust silencers & catalytic treatment
F01N holds 687 patent records and a 2% share of the IPC distribution — sparse relative to the catalysis and refining branches that dominate the corpus. Zeolite-based selective catalytic reduction (SCR) for NOx control in mobile and stationary combustion sources is a technically validated application where zeolite framework choice (e.g., chabazite-type SSZ-13) directly affects hydrothermal durability and low-temperature activity. Johnson Matthey PLC and BASF Mobile Emissions Catalysts LLC are active here, but the overall record count remains low relative to the regulatory pull from tightening emissions standards. Entry paths exist via novel metal-exchanged zeolite formulations or washcoat engineering.
Search this in Eureka →C07D · Heterocyclic compounds
C07D covers 670 patent records and a 2% share, representing zeolite-catalysed synthesis routes to heterocyclic intermediates relevant to fine chemicals and pharmaceuticals. The dominant corpus players are refining-focused and largely absent from this branch, suggesting a structural gap rather than deliberate competitive lock-out. Academic-industry collaborations — similar in structure to the Chevron–University of California partnership observed in this corpus — could serve as a practical entry model for groups with expertise in shape-selective catalysis applied to nitrogen- or oxygen-containing ring systems.
Search this in Eureka →How leading applicants differ by technology route emphasis
Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.
| Player | B01J 29 · Chemical/physical processes & catalysis | C01B 39 · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds | B01J 37 · Chemical/physical processes & catalysis | B01J 35 · Chemical/physical processes & catalysis | B01D 53 · Separation processes (filtration etc.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobil Oil Corp | Strong · 2,080 | Moderate · 610 | Emerging · 198 | Absent | Absent |
| ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc | Strong · 946 | Moderate · 282 | Moderate · 350 | Moderate · 260 | Absent |
| Johnson Matthey PLC | Strong · 591 | Moderate · 224 | Moderate · 230 | Moderate · 268 | Strong · 462 |
| Chevron USA Inc | Strong · 579 | Strong · 498 | Moderate · 138 | Moderate · 128 | Moderate · 125 |
| Saudi Arabian Oil Co | Strong · 544 | Strong · 273 | Moderate · 222 | Strong · 281 | Absent |
| UOP LLC | Strong · 616 | Strong · 388 | Absent | Emerging · 93 | Absent |
| BASF Mobile Emissions Catalysts LLC | Strong · 419 | Absent | Moderate · 196 | Moderate · 184 | Strong · 234 |
Frequently asked questions
Mobil Oil Corp leads with 2,131 patent records, nearly twice the second-ranked ExxonMobil Chemical Patents Inc at 985. This reflects decades of foundational work in zeolite framework synthesis and fluid catalytic cracking that predates the ExxonMobil merger.
The field is in a decline stage. Annual filing volume peaked at 729 patent records in 2017 and has eased to lower levels since, with a recent-window decline of 28% versus the prior period. Note that 2024 and 2025 figures are subject to publication lag and will increase as applications are published.
The United States is the leading prosecution jurisdiction with 4,950 patent records, followed by Europe (EPO) at 3,441 and WIPO (PCT) at 1,617. Japan and Canada each exceed 1,000 records, with China and India emerging as growing prosecution destinations.
Among the top eight active filers tracked, Saudi Arabian Oil Co shows the strongest positive momentum at +7% in recent filings versus the prior period, and IFP Energies Nouvelles shows a notable +109% increase, though that should be assessed in the context of its prior-period baseline. ExxonMobil Technology & Engineering Co and UOP LLC show the steepest declines at -64% and -54% respectively.
Saudi Arabian Oil Co anchors the most active collaboration network: its top co-filing relationships are with JGC Catalysts & Chemicals Ltd (136 joint records), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (114), and Aramco Services Co (103). BASF SE and Dow Global Technologies LLC form another significant pair at 86 co-filings.
The white-space analysis identifies F01N (exhaust silencers and catalytic treatment, 687 records, 2% share) and C07D (heterocyclic compounds, 670 records, 2% share) as the branches with the most plausible technical value relative to their current coverage. B01D (separation processes) and C07B (general organic chemistry methods) are also comparatively sparse relative to the dominant B01J core.
Ready to map your own zeolite catalyst landscape?
Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.