Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (10 records) with 2024 (11) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 585 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape tracks patent families addressing zeolite catalysts built into monolithic, structured, coated or microreactor formats — the miniaturization and integration work that turns a powder catalyst into a component that fits inside a reactor, exhaust line or process skid. The search combines zeolite/molecular-sieve terminology with structured-catalyst language, filtered to catalytic-process and gas-treatment IPC classes (B01J35, B01J29, B01J19/24).
Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than the true filing rate — treat the most recent bars as provisional, not as a real slowdown signal on their own.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 585-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filings ran at 35 in 2017 and peaked at 40 in 2018. By the 2022 midpoint the annual count had fallen to 15, and the trend has stayed flat or declining since — a pattern more consistent with a maturing, saturated claim space than with an emerging one still attracting new entrants.
Every record touches B01J, but 239 also fall in separation processes (B01D), 139 in acyclic/carbocyclic compound chemistry (C07C), 131 in exhaust treatment (F01N) and 98 in oil refining (C10G). That spread indicates the contested ground is less about the zeolite formulation itself and more about how it is packaged and applied downstream.
Shares are the percentage of the 585 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about zeolite catalyst miniaturization and integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA core-shell design pairs a metal oxide-loaded molecular sieve core with a porous silica shell, where the metal oxide combines an oxide of Fe, Cu, Ti, Ni or Mn with an oxide of Ce or La. The construction targets improved performance in purifying industrial waste gas, illustrating how recent filers are engineering the catalyst's physical architecture rather than just its chemistry.Filed by Kunming University of Science and Technology, published 2022 — illustrative of university-originated structured-catalyst filings rather than the incumbent chemical majors.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6093378A | Four-way diesel exhaust catalyst and method of use | 209 |
| 2 | US5367099A | Selective toluene disproportionation process (STDP) with ex situ selectivated zeolite catalyst | 147 |
| 3 | US6380119B1 | Method for regenerating a zeolitic catalyst | 134 |
| 4 | US5476823A | Method of preparation of ex situ selectivated zeolite catalysts for enhanced shape selective applications and… | 128 |
| 5 | US5675047A | Method of preparation of ex situ selectivated zeolite catalysts for aromatic alkylation applications | 123 |
| 6 | US5804155A | Basic zeolites as hydrocarbon traps for diesel oxidation catalysts | 121 |
| 7 | US6710003B2 | Process for preparing attrition resistant zeolitic layered catalyst composition | 106 |
| 8 | US5173461A | Toluene disproportionation catalyst | 103 |
| 9 | US20080051279A1 | Increased thermal conductivity monolithic zeolite structures | 102 |
| 10 | US5456822A | Catalyst of the galloaluminosilicate type containing gallium, a nobel metal of the platinum family and at lea… | 96 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate them — read this table as a map of foundational prior art, not as a ranking of current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Four read-throughs from the trend, geography and citation data, framed around what they mean for someone deciding where to file or design next.
Annual filings dropped from a 2018 peak of 40 to 15 by 2022 and have stayed flat or declining since. New entrants are filing into a space where the core architecture claims were largely staked out a decade ago.
The United States and the European Patent Office together receive more filings than the other four offices combined, with WIPO PCT, China, Canada and the UK trailing well behind. Freedom-to-operate work should weight US and EU prosecution history most heavily.
With 239 records also in B01D and 131 in F01N, a meaningful share of the claim estate is written around how the catalyst is separated, housed or exhaust-integrated rather than the zeolite chemistry alone.
The most-cited record in the corpus is a diesel exhaust catalyst patent, and the next four most-cited are all pre-2003 filings on selectivated zeolite catalysts. Foundational influence in this field is inherited, not recently created.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to zeolite catalyst miniaturization and integration, with the prior art for and against each one.
Co-filing pairs point to how incumbents structure their portfolios across national subsidiaries, while momentum data shows the leading historical filers have gone quiet in the most recent year.
The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset pairs Johnson Matthey's UK holding company with its German catalyst subsidiary at 13 shared families, a structure typical of multinational prosecution strategy rather than joint venture activity.
BASF's own corporate and stock-company entities co-file 11 shared families, with a further 7 linking to its China subsidiary — evidence of a deliberately layered filing structure across jurisdictions.
Johnson Matthey, BASF, Engelhard, Mobil Oil and Furukawa Electric all show zero filings in the most recent year, with Johnson Matthey's UK entity down 100% year over year. Read this alongside the publication lag — some of it is real cooling, some is simply not yet published.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Johnson Matthey PLC (UK) | 0 | -100% |
| BASF Corporation | 0 | — |
| Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| BASF SE | 0 | — |
| Engelhard Corporation | 0 | — |
| Mobil Oil Corporation | 0 | — |
| Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Johnson Matthey Catalysts (Germany) GmbH | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a mature core with active edges. These are the follow-up questions worth running before committing a filing or freedom-to-operate budget.
Cross-reference B01J filings against B01D and F01N to see exactly which structured-catalyst claims reach into separation and exhaust housing design — that boundary is where recent competitive activity concentrates.
Explore in EurekaZero recent filings from historical leaders could mean exit, publication lag, or a shift to trade secret. Verify against continuation filings and subsidiary assignees before assuming the space is open.
Run an assignee searchRecords like the Kunming University of Science and Technology core-shell patent show non-incumbent filers active in structured-catalyst architecture. Track whether these convert to licensing deals or stay academic.
Track new filingsFiling volume peaked at 40 records in 2018 and had fallen to 15 by the 2022 midpoint, with a flat-to-declining trend since. That said, publication lag of roughly 18 months means the last one to two years in the dataset understate true filing activity, so the most recent apparent drop should not be read as a hard stop. The more reliable read is that the core architecture claims were staked out earlier in the period, and new activity is now concentrated at narrower integration points rather than across the whole field.
Johnson Matthey and BASF show the strongest filing and co-assignee activity in this dataset, each structuring filings across multiple national entities — Johnson Matthey between its UK holding company and German catalyst subsidiary, BASF across its corporate, stock-company, and China subsidiary. Engelhard, Mobil Oil and Furukawa Electric also appear among the historically active assignees. All of these show zero filings in the most recent year in this corpus, which may reflect real slowdown, publication lag, or a shift in filing strategy.
The United States and the European Patent Office dominate, with 174 and 147 filings respectively — together accounting for more than half of all filings in the dataset. WIPO PCT filings (50) and China (43) trail well behind, with Canada and the UK smaller still. A freedom-to-operate review should prioritise US and EU prosecution history first, then extend to PCT and China filings for global manufacturing or export exposure.
Every record in this dataset falls under B01J (catalytic and physical processes), but a large share also cross into B01D separation processes (239 records) and F01N exhaust treatment (131 records). That overlap means the contested claim space is not just the zeolite formulation itself but how it is packaged, housed, and integrated into a separation or exhaust system. A filer focused purely on catalyst chemistry without checking these adjacent classes risks missing the claims that actually block commercialization.
Not necessarily — citation counts in any patent corpus favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations. The five most-cited records here are all pre-2003 filings on diesel exhaust catalysts and selectivated zeolite processes for aromatic chemistry. They matter as foundational prior art and freedom-to-operate reference points, but they are not a reliable guide to which technical routes are being actively pursued now.
Go past this page: query the whole zeolite catalyst miniaturization and integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.