https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/zeolite-catalyst-miniaturization-and-integration-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Chemical & Process Engineering
Zeolite catalyst miniaturization patents: who holds the claims and where filing has cooled
  • Filing has declined from its 2018 peak of 40 records a year to a flat, thin pace by the mid-2020s , meaning claim space that looked crowded a decade ago is not being actively re-contested today.
  • B01J anchors every record, but 239 filings also cross into separation (B01D) and 131 into exhaust treatment (F01N) , showing the real competitive fight is at the integration boundary, not inside catalysis alone.
  • The five most-cited records are all pre-2003 diesel and toluene-disproportionation patents , so influence in this corpus is inherited from legacy automotive and refining chemistry, not from recent structured-catalyst work.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
585
Published Records
41%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+10%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (10 records) with 2024 (11) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 585 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families addressing zeolite catalysts built into monolithic, structured, coated or microreactor formats — the miniaturization and integration work that turns a powder catalyst into a component that fits inside a reactor, exhaust line or process skid. The search combines zeolite/molecular-sieve terminology with structured-catalyst language, filtered to catalytic-process and gas-treatment IPC classes (B01J35, B01J29, B01J19/24).

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than the true filing rate — treat the most recent bars as provisional, not as a real slowdown signal on their own.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1JOHNSON MATTHEY PLC72
  2. 2FURUKAWA ELECTRIC CO LTD51
  3. 3BASF CORPORATON44
  4. 4BASF SE42
  5. 5ENGELHARD CORP31
  6. 6NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD25
  7. 7MOBIL OIL CORP25
  8. 8JOHNSON MATTHEY CATALYSTS (GERMANY) GMBH21
  9. 9EXXONMOBIL CHEMICAL PATENTS INC20
  10. 10BASF MOBILE EMISSIONS CATALYSTS LLC18
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 585-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A peak in 2018, then a flat-to-declining run

Filings ran at 35 in 2017 and peaked at 40 in 2018. By the 2022 midpoint the annual count had fallen to 15, and the trend has stayed flat or declining since — a pattern more consistent with a maturing, saturated claim space than with an emerging one still attracting new entrants.

A peak in 2018, then a flat-to-declining run010203040352017402018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Catalysis is the anchor, but the fight spreads across four other subclasses

Every record touches B01J, but 239 also fall in separation processes (B01D), 139 in acyclic/carbocyclic compound chemistry (C07C), 131 in exhaust treatment (F01N) and 98 in oil refining (C10G). That spread indicates the contested ground is less about the zeolite formulation itself and more about how it is packaged and applied downstream.

Catalysis is the anchor, but the fight spreads across four other subclassesB01J · Chemical/physical processes & …585100.0%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…23940.9%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds13923.8%F01N · Exhaust silencers & treatment13122.4%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining9816.8%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…6811.6%C07B · General organic chemistry meth…518.7%C10K · Purifying fuel gases122.1%Other7112.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 585 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Zeolite Catalyst Miniaturization and Integration with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about zeolite catalyst miniaturization and integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The prior art carrying the most citation weight

Representative filing
US11247197B12022-02-15

Core-shell structured catalyst for industrial tail gas treatment

KUNMING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

A core-shell design pairs a metal oxide-loaded molecular sieve core with a porous silica shell, where the metal oxide combines an oxide of Fe, Cu, Ti, Ni or Mn with an oxide of Ce or La. The construction targets improved performance in purifying industrial waste gas, illustrating how recent filers are engineering the catalyst's physical architecture rather than just its chemistry.Filed by Kunming University of Science and Technology, published 2022 — illustrative of university-originated structured-catalyst filings rather than the incumbent chemical majors.

US11247197B1 — patent drawing 1US11247197B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6093378AFour-way diesel exhaust catalyst and method of use209
2US5367099ASelective toluene disproportionation process (STDP) with ex situ selectivated zeolite catalyst147
3US6380119B1Method for regenerating a zeolitic catalyst134
4US5476823AMethod of preparation of ex situ selectivated zeolite catalysts for enhanced shape selective applications and…128
5US5675047AMethod of preparation of ex situ selectivated zeolite catalysts for aromatic alkylation applications123
6US5804155ABasic zeolites as hydrocarbon traps for diesel oxidation catalysts121
7US6710003B2Process for preparing attrition resistant zeolitic layered catalyst composition106
8US5173461AToluene disproportionation catalyst103
9US20080051279A1Increased thermal conductivity monolithic zeolite structures102
10US5456822ACatalyst of the galloaluminosilicate type containing gallium, a nobel metal of the platinum family and at lea…96

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate them — read this table as a map of foundational prior art, not as a ranking of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers imply for a filing decision

Four read-throughs from the trend, geography and citation data, framed around what they mean for someone deciding where to file or design next.

Filing momentum
40 → 15
peak year vs. 2022 midpoint

The rush has already happened

Annual filings dropped from a 2018 peak of 40 to 15 by 2022 and have stayed flat or declining since. New entrants are filing into a space where the core architecture claims were largely staked out a decade ago.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Jurisdictional split
US 174 · EPO 147
leading receiving offices

Filing strategy centres on US and Europe

The United States and the European Patent Office together receive more filings than the other four offices combined, with WIPO PCT, China, Canada and the UK trailing well behind. Freedom-to-operate work should weight US and EU prosecution history most heavily.

Receiving office counts
Technology spread
5 IPC subclasses
beyond the core B01J anchor

Integration claims cross into separation and exhaust

With 239 records also in B01D and 131 in F01N, a meaningful share of the claim estate is written around how the catalyst is separated, housed or exhaust-integrated rather than the zeolite chemistry alone.

IPC composition
Citation concentration
209 citations
top-cited record

Influence sits with 1990s-2000s diesel and refining art

The most-cited record in the corpus is a diesel exhaust catalyst patent, and the next four most-cited are all pre-2003 filings on selectivated zeolite catalysts. Foundational influence in this field is inherited, not recently created.

Most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to zeolite catalyst miniaturization and integration, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's active

Assignee landscape and where the gaps sit

Co-filing pairs point to how incumbents structure their portfolios across national subsidiaries, while momentum data shows the leading historical filers have gone quiet in the most recent year.

Strongest co-filing pair
13 shared families
co-assignee pair count

Johnson Matthey files across UK and German entities

The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset pairs Johnson Matthey's UK holding company with its German catalyst subsidiary at 13 shared families, a structure typical of multinational prosecution strategy rather than joint venture activity.

Co-assignee pairs, n=10
Second pairing
11 shared families
co-assignee pair count

BASF splits filings between corporate entities

BASF's own corporate and stock-company entities co-file 11 shared families, with a further 7 linking to its China subsidiary — evidence of a deliberately layered filing structure across jurisdictions.

Co-assignee pairs, n=10
Recent momentum
0 filings, latest year
across leading historical assignees

The historical leaders have stopped filing

Johnson Matthey, BASF, Engelhard, Mobil Oil and Furukawa Electric all show zero filings in the most recent year, with Johnson Matthey's UK entity down 100% year over year. Read this alongside the publication lag — some of it is real cooling, some is simply not yet published.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches sit at the edges of the core IPC classes and show comparatively thin coverage in this corpus — worth a focused freedom-to-operate check rather than an assumption of open space.
Microreactor-scale zeolite coating uniformityCore-shell catalysts for tail-gas treatmentPurification of fuel gases (C10K) integrationEx-situ selectivation for aromatic alkylationStructured catalysts for gas microreactors
Rank all filers by momentum →
Momentum by assignee, latest year vs. prior
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Johnson Matthey PLC (UK)0-100%
BASF Corporation0
Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd.0
BASF SE0
Engelhard Corporation0
Mobil Oil Corporation0
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.0
Johnson Matthey Catalysts (Germany) GmbH0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature core with active edges. These are the follow-up questions worth running before committing a filing or freedom-to-operate budget.

Map the integration boundary claims

Cross-reference B01J filings against B01D and F01N to see exactly which structured-catalyst claims reach into separation and exhaust housing design — that boundary is where recent competitive activity concentrates.

Explore in Eureka

Check the quiet incumbents' pipelines

Zero recent filings from historical leaders could mean exit, publication lag, or a shift to trade secret. Verify against continuation filings and subsidiary assignees before assuming the space is open.

Run an assignee search

Stress-test the university-originated filings

Records like the Kunming University of Science and Technology core-shell patent show non-incumbent filers active in structured-catalyst architecture. Track whether these convert to licensing deals or stay academic.

Track new filings
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Zeolite Catalyst Miniaturization and Integration in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole zeolite catalyst miniaturization and integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.