Book a demo

Zeolite Catalyst Purification Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026

Zeolite Catalyst Purification Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/zeolite-catalyst-purification-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Chemical & Process Engineering
Zeolite catalyst purification patents: who holds the core claims and where filing has stalled
  • Filing has plateaued, not grown. Volume peaked at 51 records in 2023 after rising from 46 in 2017, with the top assignees showing zero filings in the most recent year — the core claim space looks settled, not active.
  • Gas-phase adsorption dominates over water treatment. B01J and B01D records each dominate the corpus and clearly overlap, while C02F water-treatment filings sit well behind — liquid-phase purification is real but far less patent-dense.
  • Collaboration is rare across the entire field. Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across 1,188 families, and the strongest pairing tops out at 6 shared filings — most claim-building here happens inside single organisations.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,188
Published Records
15%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-4%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (46 records) with 2024 (44) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,188 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this patent landscape covers

This landscape covers zeolite catalyst purification: patents claiming zeolite, molecular sieve or related adsorbent materials used for adsorptive removal of gas or liquid impurities, spanning gas purification, water purification and general impurity removal applications. The corpus is built from records tagged across catalysis (B01J), separation processes (B01D) and water treatment (C02F) IPC subclasses, with smaller adjacent coverage in exhaust treatment, fuels and disinfection.

The dataset spans filings from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off date, drawing on 1,188 patent families. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, counts for the most recent year are necessarily incomplete and should be read as a lower bound rather than a final figure.

Filing volume and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1UOP LLC46
  2. 2NGK INSULATORS LTD40
  3. 3MITSUI MINING & SMELTING CO LTD38
  4. 4TOSOH CORP26
  5. 5PRAXAIR TECH INC25
  6. 6JOHNSON MATTHEY PLC23
  7. 7ENGELHARD CORP20
  8. 8JOSAB INT19
  9. 9ZEOCHEM LLC19
  10. 10NIPPON SANSO CORP18
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Purification covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Filing activity across this corpus peaked in 2023 and has since flattened, while the technology mix stays concentrated in three adjacent IPC subclasses that together account for the large majority of records.

A flat-to-declining filing curve since 2023

Filings rose from 46 in 2017 to a peak of 51 in 2023, with 2022 sitting at 39 — a midpoint that shows growth was already levelling off before the peak. The most recent year is partial and will be revised upward as publication catches up, but the multi-year plateau predates that lag.

A flat-to-declining filing curve since 20230153045604620172018201920202021202251202320242025132026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Three overlapping cores: catalysis, separation, water treatment

B01J (chemical/physical processes & catalysis) and B01D (separation processes) each cover the large majority of records and clearly overlap, pointing to gas-phase adsorption-catalysis as the dominant architecture. C02F (water treatment) is a distinct but smaller third pillar; F01N, C07C, C10L and A61L are minor adjacent branches with far less filing density.

Three overlapping cores: catalysis, separation, water treatmentB01J · Chemical/physical processes & …78165.7%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…69358.3%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment48640.9%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…28724.2%F01N · Exhaust silencers & treatment887.4%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds383.2%C10L · Fuels & firelighters252.1%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting211.8%Other34429.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,188 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Purification covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Zeolite Catalyst Purification with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about zeolite catalyst purification and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

Key patents shaping the claim landscape

Representative Filing
US3808773A1974-05-07

Process and apparatus for the adsorptive purification of gases

LINDE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

A method for the adsorptive purification of gases containing water and one or more secondary components which comprises passing the gas through a molecular sieve bed, thereby charging the molecular sieve with adsorbable components, terminating charging of the molecular sieve upon the breakthrough of the least easily adsorbable secondary adsorbate component prior to the breakthrough of water vapor therefrom, and regenerating the molecular sieve at a temperature of 100–200°C, preferably 100–150°C, and especially about 100°C, by passing a heated purge gas through the molecular sieve bed in a direction opposite to the adsorption direction.Filed 1974 — now expired, but its breakthrough-timing and counter-current regeneration method shaped how later molecular sieve adsorbent claims were drafted around composition rather than method.

US3808773A — patent drawing 1US3808773A — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4795482AProcess for eliminating organic odors and compositions for use therein177
2US6183539B1Molecular sieve adsorbent for gas purification and preparation thereof96
3US5071587AComposition and method for purifying water96
4US6068682ASmall-pored crystalline titanium molecular sieve zeolites and their use in gas separation processes94
5GB2460064AA method of forming a permanently magnetic absorbent composite material91
6US6752852B1Apparatus for removing moisture from fluids comprising acid gases; methods of using same, and compositions86
7US20040043276A1Fuel cell system and method with increased efficiency and reduced exhaust emissions83
8US7713333B2Adsorbents for pressure swing adsorption systems and methods of use therefor79
9US3808773AProcess and apparatus for the adsorptive purification of gases77
10US5013335AProcess for sequestering ammonia and the odor associated therewith74

Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus and skew toward older, foundational filings — read them as a measure of influence, not of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Purification covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Data Insights

What the filing data shows

Reading filing volume, geography and citation weight together points to a mature, method-differentiated field rather than a fast-moving one.

Filing Trend
51 in 2023
peak year

Growth has flattened since the 2023 peak

Filings climbed from 46 in 2017 to a peak of 51 in 2023, with the 2022 midpoint at 39 already signalling a slowdown. The most recent year's count of 13 is partial and will rise with publication lag, but the multi-year shape is flat-to-declining rather than accelerating.

2017–2026 filing window
Geography
China · 277 filings
leading receiving office

China and the US lead receiving-office volume

China (277) and the United States (211) are the largest receiving offices, ahead of Europe (159), Japan (134), WIPO/PCT (82) and India (54). That spread points to commercial interest concentrated in the largest manufacturing and regulatory markets rather than a single dominant jurisdiction.

Receiving office counts, all years
Technology Mix
781 B01J records
largest IPC subclass

Catalysis and separation subclasses dominate

B01J (chemical/physical processes & catalysis) leads at 781 records, closely tracked by B01D separation processes at 693 — the two clearly overlap on gas-phase adsorption architectures. C02F water treatment trails at 486, a distinct but smaller third pillar.

IPC subclass distribution
Influence
177 citations
top-cited record

Citation weight sits with older foundational records

The most-cited record in this corpus draws 177 citations, with several other pre-2000 records close behind. That pattern is typical of citation counts inside a searched corpus — it favours older, foundational filings and should be read as a signal of influence, not of current technical relevance.

Citation ranking, all years
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to zeolite catalyst purification, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Collaboration is the exception, not the norm
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
NGK Insulators, Ltd.MATSUKATA MASAHIKO6
UOP LLC (Universal Oil Products)RASTELLI HENRY2
UOP LLC (Universal Oil Products)PATEL KIRIT M2
UOP LLC (Universal Oil Products)HERRON MICHELE S2
UOP LLC (Universal Oil Products)GRIFFITH HENRY L2
UOP LLC (Universal Oil Products)BUCHAN MARTHA S2
UOP LLC (Universal Oil Products)BEDARD ROBERT L2
Tosoh CorporationToyo Soda Manufacturing Co., Ltd.2

Ten co-assignee pairs exist across the full 1,188-family set, and the strongest — an industrial filer paired with an academic inventor — reaches only six shared filings. Most patent-building in this field happens inside single organisations rather than through joint ventures or university partnerships.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Purification covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who holds the core claims

Filing in this field is led by a small group of established industrial and materials companies whose portfolios were largely built in earlier years — recent-year filing activity from these same leaders has dropped to zero, while collaboration between organisations remains rare.

Filing Volume
1,188 families
total corpus

A long tail beneath a concentrated top

The assignee ranking spans 1,188 patent families, with filing volume concentrated among a handful of long-established filers and a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants. That shape is typical of a field where core chemistry claims were staked early and later entrants differentiate on narrower process claims.

Assignee ranking, all years
Recent Momentum
0 in latest year
top assignees

Leading filers show no recent-year activity

Every one of the top-filing assignees identified in this corpus recorded zero filings in the most recent year. That does not necessarily mean disengagement — publication lag affects the newest filings most — but it does mean the visible claim-staking by incumbents has slowed markedly from its historical pace.

Latest full year vs. historical average
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
across full corpus

Joint filing is rare across the field

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across the entire dataset, and the strongest pairing — an industrial filer with an academic inventor — reaches six shared filings. Most organisations in this space build their portfolios independently rather than through joint ventures or university partnerships.

Co-assignee pair analysis
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
These branches carry far fewer filings than the dominant catalysis and separation cores, leaving room for narrowly drawn claims.
Titanium-substituted molecular sieve gas separationZeolite-based disinfection/sterilisation adsorbentsHybrid adsorbent-catalyst composite regenerationFuel-stream impurity adsorption for C10L applicationsBreakthrough-timing control for mixed secondary adsorbates
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
UOP LLC (Universal Oil Products)0
NGK Insulators, Ltd.0
Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd.0
Tosoh Corporation0
Johnson Matthey PLC (UK)0
Praxair Technology, Inc.0
Engelhard Corporation0
Chausub International, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Purification covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The filing data points to a settled core and a handful of thinner branches worth deeper diligence before committing R&D or filing budget.

Map claim boundaries around the core prior art

Before filing into the B01J/B01D core, get a clause-level read on how far US3808773A-style method claims and the leading composition claims actually extend, and where process-level differentiation still has room.

Explore claims in Eureka

Track the incumbents' next move

Zero recent-year filings from the top assignees could mean a pause or a pivot to trade secrecy. Set alerts on these organisations to catch the next filing before it publishes.

Set up assignee tracking

Validate white space before committing budget

The thinner branches — disinfection, fuels, and acyclic compound processing — look under-claimed on filing volume alone, but need a freedom-to-operate check against the full claim text before treating them as open.

Run a white-space search
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Purification covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Questions & Answers

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zeolite Catalyst Purification covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Zeolite Catalyst Purification in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole zeolite catalyst purification corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.