Zeolite Catalyst Purification Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
- Filing has plateaued, not grown. Volume peaked at 51 records in 2023 after rising from 46 in 2017, with the top assignees showing zero filings in the most recent year — the core claim space looks settled, not active.
- Gas-phase adsorption dominates over water treatment. B01J and B01D records each dominate the corpus and clearly overlap, while C02F water-treatment filings sit well behind — liquid-phase purification is real but far less patent-dense.
- Collaboration is rare across the entire field. Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across 1,188 families, and the strongest pairing tops out at 6 shared filings — most claim-building here happens inside single organisations.
Filing growth compares 2021 (46 records) with 2024 (44) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,188 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this patent landscape covers
This landscape covers zeolite catalyst purification: patents claiming zeolite, molecular sieve or related adsorbent materials used for adsorptive removal of gas or liquid impurities, spanning gas purification, water purification and general impurity removal applications. The corpus is built from records tagged across catalysis (B01J), separation processes (B01D) and water treatment (C02F) IPC subclasses, with smaller adjacent coverage in exhaust treatment, fuels and disinfection.
The dataset spans filings from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off date, drawing on 1,188 patent families. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, counts for the most recent year are necessarily incomplete and should be read as a lower bound rather than a final figure.
Filing trends and technology composition
Filing activity across this corpus peaked in 2023 and has since flattened, while the technology mix stays concentrated in three adjacent IPC subclasses that together account for the large majority of records.
A flat-to-declining filing curve since 2023
Filings rose from 46 in 2017 to a peak of 51 in 2023, with 2022 sitting at 39 — a midpoint that shows growth was already levelling off before the peak. The most recent year is partial and will be revised upward as publication catches up, but the multi-year plateau predates that lag.
Three overlapping cores: catalysis, separation, water treatment
B01J (chemical/physical processes & catalysis) and B01D (separation processes) each cover the large majority of records and clearly overlap, pointing to gas-phase adsorption-catalysis as the dominant architecture. C02F (water treatment) is a distinct but smaller third pillar; F01N, C07C, C10L and A61L are minor adjacent branches with far less filing density.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,188 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Zeolite Catalyst Purification with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about zeolite catalyst purification and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaKey patents shaping the claim landscape
Process and apparatus for the adsorptive purification of gases
A method for the adsorptive purification of gases containing water and one or more secondary components which comprises passing the gas through a molecular sieve bed, thereby charging the molecular sieve with adsorbable components, terminating charging of the molecular sieve upon the breakthrough of the least easily adsorbable secondary adsorbate component prior to the breakthrough of water vapor therefrom, and regenerating the molecular sieve at a temperature of 100–200°C, preferably 100–150°C, and especially about 100°C, by passing a heated purge gas through the molecular sieve bed in a direction opposite to the adsorption direction.Filed 1974 — now expired, but its breakthrough-timing and counter-current regeneration method shaped how later molecular sieve adsorbent claims were drafted around composition rather than method.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4795482A | Process for eliminating organic odors and compositions for use therein | 177 |
| 2 | US6183539B1 | Molecular sieve adsorbent for gas purification and preparation thereof | 96 |
| 3 | US5071587A | Composition and method for purifying water | 96 |
| 4 | US6068682A | Small-pored crystalline titanium molecular sieve zeolites and their use in gas separation processes | 94 |
| 5 | GB2460064A | A method of forming a permanently magnetic absorbent composite material | 91 |
| 6 | US6752852B1 | Apparatus for removing moisture from fluids comprising acid gases; methods of using same, and compositions | 86 |
| 7 | US20040043276A1 | Fuel cell system and method with increased efficiency and reduced exhaust emissions | 83 |
| 8 | US7713333B2 | Adsorbents for pressure swing adsorption systems and methods of use therefor | 79 |
| 9 | US3808773A | Process and apparatus for the adsorptive purification of gases | 77 |
| 10 | US5013335A | Process for sequestering ammonia and the odor associated therewith | 74 |
Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus and skew toward older, foundational filings — read them as a measure of influence, not of current technical importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing data shows
Reading filing volume, geography and citation weight together points to a mature, method-differentiated field rather than a fast-moving one.
Growth has flattened since the 2023 peak
Filings climbed from 46 in 2017 to a peak of 51 in 2023, with the 2022 midpoint at 39 already signalling a slowdown. The most recent year's count of 13 is partial and will rise with publication lag, but the multi-year shape is flat-to-declining rather than accelerating.
China and the US lead receiving-office volume
China (277) and the United States (211) are the largest receiving offices, ahead of Europe (159), Japan (134), WIPO/PCT (82) and India (54). That spread points to commercial interest concentrated in the largest manufacturing and regulatory markets rather than a single dominant jurisdiction.
Catalysis and separation subclasses dominate
B01J (chemical/physical processes & catalysis) leads at 781 records, closely tracked by B01D separation processes at 693 — the two clearly overlap on gas-phase adsorption architectures. C02F water treatment trails at 486, a distinct but smaller third pillar.
Citation weight sits with older foundational records
The most-cited record in this corpus draws 177 citations, with several other pre-2000 records close behind. That pattern is typical of citation counts inside a searched corpus — it favours older, foundational filings and should be read as a signal of influence, not of current technical relevance.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to zeolite catalyst purification, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| NGK Insulators, Ltd. | MATSUKATA MASAHIKO | 6 |
| UOP LLC (Universal Oil Products) | RASTELLI HENRY | 2 |
| UOP LLC (Universal Oil Products) | PATEL KIRIT M | 2 |
| UOP LLC (Universal Oil Products) | HERRON MICHELE S | 2 |
| UOP LLC (Universal Oil Products) | GRIFFITH HENRY L | 2 |
| UOP LLC (Universal Oil Products) | BUCHAN MARTHA S | 2 |
| UOP LLC (Universal Oil Products) | BEDARD ROBERT L | 2 |
| Tosoh Corporation | Toyo Soda Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | 2 |
Ten co-assignee pairs exist across the full 1,188-family set, and the strongest — an industrial filer paired with an academic inventor — reaches only six shared filings. Most patent-building in this field happens inside single organisations rather than through joint ventures or university partnerships.
Who holds the core claims
Filing in this field is led by a small group of established industrial and materials companies whose portfolios were largely built in earlier years — recent-year filing activity from these same leaders has dropped to zero, while collaboration between organisations remains rare.
A long tail beneath a concentrated top
The assignee ranking spans 1,188 patent families, with filing volume concentrated among a handful of long-established filers and a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants. That shape is typical of a field where core chemistry claims were staked early and later entrants differentiate on narrower process claims.
Leading filers show no recent-year activity
Every one of the top-filing assignees identified in this corpus recorded zero filings in the most recent year. That does not necessarily mean disengagement — publication lag affects the newest filings most — but it does mean the visible claim-staking by incumbents has slowed markedly from its historical pace.
Joint filing is rare across the field
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across the entire dataset, and the strongest pairing — an industrial filer with an academic inventor — reaches six shared filings. Most organisations in this space build their portfolios independently rather than through joint ventures or university partnerships.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| UOP LLC (Universal Oil Products) | 0 | — |
| NGK Insulators, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Tosoh Corporation | 0 | — |
| Johnson Matthey PLC (UK) | 0 | — |
| Praxair Technology, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Engelhard Corporation | 0 | — |
| Chausub International, Inc. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis next
The filing data points to a settled core and a handful of thinner branches worth deeper diligence before committing R&D or filing budget.
Map claim boundaries around the core prior art
Before filing into the B01J/B01D core, get a clause-level read on how far US3808773A-style method claims and the leading composition claims actually extend, and where process-level differentiation still has room.
Explore claims in EurekaTrack the incumbents' next move
Zero recent-year filings from the top assignees could mean a pause or a pivot to trade secrecy. Set alerts on these organisations to catch the next filing before it publishes.
Set up assignee trackingValidate white space before committing budget
The thinner branches — disinfection, fuels, and acyclic compound processing — look under-claimed on filing volume alone, but need a freedom-to-operate check against the full claim text before treating them as open.
Run a white-space searchFrequently asked questions
Patents in this space cover using zeolite and molecular sieve materials to remove impurities from gas or liquid streams, most often water vapour, odorous organics, or trace contaminants ahead of a catalytic or industrial process. The dominant application, based on IPC coverage, is gas-phase adsorptive purification (B01J and B01D), with water and wastewater treatment (C02F) as a smaller but distinct pillar. Exhaust treatment and fuel-related uses appear as minor adjacent applications rather than separate technical fields.
Filing is concentrated among a handful of established industrial and materials companies with long filing histories in molecular sieve chemistry, alongside a long tail of smaller filers and academic co-assignees. Recent-year momentum for the largest historical filers has dropped to zero, indicating their core composition claims were staked out in earlier years rather than being actively contested now. Co-assignee activity is thin overall, with only ten recorded pairs and the strongest pairing showing six shared filings between an industrial filer and an academic inventor.
Filing volume rose through the late 2010s, peaked at 51 records in 2023, and has been flat to declining since, with 2022 already showing signs of a plateau at 39 filings. Because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent year's count is understated and will rise somewhat as more records publish. Even accounting for that lag, the multi-year trend does not show the kind of sustained acceleration typical of an emerging technology area.
US3808773A claims a specific molecular sieve adsorption method: charging the sieve with a gas containing water and secondary components, halting the charge at the breakthrough of the least-adsorbable secondary component before water breaks through, then regenerating with a counter-current heated purge gas at 100–200°C. The claim is method-specific rather than a broad composition claim, so processes that time regeneration differently or use co-current purging sit outside its literal scope. The patent's term has long expired, but its breadth is one reason later filings differentiated on adsorbent composition rather than on the basic adsorb-and-regenerate cycle.
The smallest IPC branches in this dataset — sterilising and disinfecting applications, fuel-related uses, and acyclic/carbocyclic compound processing — carry far fewer filings than the dominant catalysis, separation and water-treatment cores, and show little sign of dense claim coverage from the leading assignees. That combination of low filing density and thin co-assignee collaboration suggests these adjacent branches have not yet attracted coordinated R&D investment. A narrowly drawn claim combining a specific zeolite composition with one of these under-claimed applications is more likely to clear prior art than a claim filed into the crowded core.
Research Zeolite Catalyst Purification in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole zeolite catalyst purification corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.