Book a demo

Zero Liquid Discharge Heavy Metal Removal Patents: Leaders & Gaps 2026

Zero Liquid Discharge Heavy Metal Removal Patents: Leaders & Gaps 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/zero-liquid-discharge-heavy-metal-removal-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Water & Environmental
Zero Liquid Discharge Heavy Metal Removal Patents: Filing Trends and Where Claims Concentrate
  • Flat, not rising. Filings peaked at 11 in 2022 and the 2026 count of 8 sits below that midpoint, so the field has not shown sustained year-on-year growth.
  • Four IPC subclasses carry the field. C02F, C01D, B01D and C01F each appear in roughly a third or more of the 121 families, while C22B metal extraction and C23C coating routes barely register.
  • Co-filing is rare. Only two co-assignee pairs exist across the whole dataset, meaning most of this technology has been developed and filed by single entities rather than joint ventures.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
121
Published Records
56%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+800%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Zero liquid discharge (ZLD) heavy metal removal sits at the intersection of brine minimization and selective metal recovery: processes that concentrate industrial or desalination wastewater to the point of near-zero discharge while pulling heavy metals out of the resulting brine before it is crystallized or disposed of. The 121 patent families in this dataset span filings from 2015 through mid-2026, concentrated in water treatment (C02F), alkali-metal and alkaline-earth compound chemistry (C01D, C01F), and physical separation hardware (B01D).

Filing activity is not building toward a clear inflection point. The peak year to date is 2022, and the most recent full year sits below that level — though publication lag of roughly 18 months means 2025 and 2026 counts will rise somewhat as later filings publish. Receiving-office data shows the United States and India as the two largest filing destinations, with PCT, Australian, European and Canadian filings trailing behind.

Filings by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1EASYMINING SWEDEN AB32
  2. 2INNOVATOR ENERGY LLC12
  3. 3COUNCIL OF SCI & IND RES9
  4. 4COMMONWEALTH SCI & IND RES ORG8
  5. 5OASYS WATER INC7
  6. 6QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY6
  7. 7ALBEMARLE CORP5
  8. 8DESALACION INTEGRAL SYST4
  9. 9DATANG ENVIRONMENT IND GRP4
  10. 10DONGARE MOHAN KERABA4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zero Liquid Discharge Heavy Metal Removal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

121 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, indexed against IPC subclass and receiving office to show where claim density sits and where it thins out.

A flat filing curve since 2022

Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 11 in 2022, then eased back toward 8 in 2026. Because 2022 is the midpoint of the observed range and later years have not exceeded it, this reads as a mature or plateauing filing pattern rather than one still accelerating — keeping in mind that the newest filings are always undercounted at the point of data capture.

A flat filing curve since 202203691222017201820192020202111202220232024202582026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Four subclasses hold most of the claim space

C02F (water and wastewater treatment, 50 records), C01D (alkali-metal compounds, 47), B01D (separation processes, 43) and C01F (alkaline-earth, aluminium and rare-earth compounds, 42) each cover roughly a third or more of the dataset. B09B (solid waste disposal, 27) is a secondary cluster. C01B, C22B and C23C — non-metallic element chemistry, metal extraction/refining, and coating/surface deposition — each carry single-digit counts, marking them as thin ground relative to the core water-treatment and precipitation chemistry.

Four subclasses hold most of the claim spaceC02F · Water & wastewater treatment5041.3%C01D · Alkali-metal compounds4738.8%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…4335.5%C01F · Alkaline-earth, Al & rare-eart…4234.7%B09B · Solid waste disposal2722.3%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…97.4%C22B · Metal extraction & refining75.8%C23C · Coating & surface deposition75.8%Other4335.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 121 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zero Liquid Discharge Heavy Metal Removal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Zero Liquid Discharge Heavy Metal Removal with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about zero liquid discharge heavy metal removal and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited records in this corpus

Representative filing
US20090045116A12009-02-19

Plant for the desalination/purification of brackish water and industrial waste with zero liquid discharge

ESCRIBANO, JOSE CLAVEL

Describes a combined heat-and-power ZLD plant integrating reverse osmosis or filtering modules, waste-receiving containers, a centrifugal module, dryers, a heating circuit and high-vacuum chambers with ejectors driven by fresh water, plus an internal combustion engine coupled to an alternator for on-site power generation.Filed by Jose Clavel Escribano, published 2009-02-19.

US20090045116A1 — patent drawing 1US20090045116A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20120267307A1Osmotic separation systems and methods91
2WO2017133511A1脱硫废水零排放处理的装置及方法79
3WO2017133512A1一种脱硫废水零排放处理装置及方法26
4US20090045116A1Plant for the desalination/purification of brackish water and industrial waste with zero liquid discharge20
5US9039899B2Osmotic separation systems and methods15
6US20200261858A1Permeable graphene and permeable graphene membranes14
7US20210047203A1Method and device for continuous salt extraction from brine13
8WO2018161116A1Permeable graphene and permeable graphene membranes12
9EP1982958A1Plant for the desalination/purification of brackish water and industrial waste with zero liquid discharge12
10US20150086452A1Process for manufacture of sodium hydroxide and sodium chloride products from waste brine11

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of what the field has built on, not of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zero Liquid Discharge Heavy Metal Removal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC composition and citation data are read together.

Filing trajectory
11 in 2022, 8 in 2026
peak year vs. latest year

The field has plateaued, not accelerated

A filing curve that peaks at the midpoint of the observed window and does not exceed that peak in later years suggests the core process claims — osmotic separation, selective precipitation, brine crystallization — were staked out early. New entrants are more likely to find open ground in downstream metal recovery than in the core ZLD process itself.

Based on 121 families, 2017-2026.
Claim concentration
C02F 50, C01D 47, B01D 43, C01F 42
top four IPC subclasses

Four subclasses absorb most of the filing activity

Water treatment, alkali/alkaline-earth compound chemistry and physical separation together account for the bulk of records. Filing a broad process claim in these subclasses now means competing against a dense, multi-decade prior art base rather than opening new territory.

IPC subclass counts, 121 total records.
Collaboration pattern
2 co-assignee pairs
across 121 families

Development is overwhelmingly single-assignee

Only two co-filing relationships appear in the dataset, one of them a research-institute pairing filing at meaningfully higher volume than the other. That scarcity of joint filings points to a field where IP is being built inside single organizations rather than through cross-licensed consortia.

Strongest pair filed 8 families jointly.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to zero liquid discharge heavy metal removal, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zero Liquid Discharge Heavy Metal Removal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

Assignee activity is led by a small set of research institutes and water-technology firms, with most other filers appearing once or twice in the dataset.

Research-institute leader
8 joint families
strongest co-assignee pair

A single research collaboration dominates joint filing

The strongest co-assignee relationship in the dataset — a national science research organization paired with a technology university — accounts for the only substantial joint-filing volume observed. No other pairing approaches this scale.

Co-assignee pair analysis, 121 families.
Recent momentum
2 filings in latest year
highest recent-year count observed

Momentum has largely stalled across named assignees

Most tracked assignees show zero filings in the most recent year, with only one entity registering as many as two. That pattern, combined with the flat overall trend, suggests the active filer base has narrowed rather than expanded.

Recent-year momentum by assignee.
Filing geography
US 26, India 18, PCT 16
top receiving offices

US and India lead receiving offices, Europe and Canada trail

The United States and India together account for a large share of filings, ahead of PCT applications and Australian, European and Canadian offices. Freedom-to-operate work should weight US and Indian prior art most heavily, then check PCT family members for downstream jurisdictions.

Receiving office counts, 121 records.
🔍
Under-claimed technical branches
Sub-areas with thin IPC coverage relative to the core water-treatment and precipitation chemistry classes.
Metal extraction/refining integration (C22B)Coating-based scale and fouling control (C23C)Non-metallic inorganic byproduct valorization (C01B)Selective precipitation reagent chemistryBrine-to-metal recovery process integration
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Innovative Energy LLC2
Easy Mining Sweden AB0
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)0
Oasys Water, Inc.0
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)0
Queensland University of Technology0
Albemarle Corporation0
Datang Environment Industry Group Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zero Liquid Discharge Heavy Metal Removal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a plateaued core process with thin coverage in adjacent metal-recovery chemistry. Two directions follow from that.

Map claim scope against the four dominant IPC subclasses

Before drafting in C02F, C01D, B01D or C01F, run a freedom-to-operate check against the highest-cited records in this corpus, since those subclasses carry the densest and oldest prior art.

Explore the IPC breakdown in Eureka

Assess the under-claimed metal-recovery branches

C22B and C23C show single-digit filing counts relative to the core water-treatment classes, which may indicate either genuine white space or simply that metal-recovery chemistry has not yet been claimed as ZLD-specific.

Search adjacent branches in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zero Liquid Discharge Heavy Metal Removal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Zero Liquid Discharge Heavy Metal Removal covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Zero Liquid Discharge Heavy Metal Removal in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole zero liquid discharge heavy metal removal corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.