Zero Liquid Discharge Heavy Metal Removal Patents: Leaders & Gaps 2026
- Flat, not rising. Filings peaked at 11 in 2022 and the 2026 count of 8 sits below that midpoint, so the field has not shown sustained year-on-year growth.
- Four IPC subclasses carry the field. C02F, C01D, B01D and C01F each appear in roughly a third or more of the 121 families, while C22B metal extraction and C23C coating routes barely register.
- Co-filing is rare. Only two co-assignee pairs exist across the whole dataset, meaning most of this technology has been developed and filed by single entities rather than joint ventures.
What this landscape covers
Zero liquid discharge (ZLD) heavy metal removal sits at the intersection of brine minimization and selective metal recovery: processes that concentrate industrial or desalination wastewater to the point of near-zero discharge while pulling heavy metals out of the resulting brine before it is crystallized or disposed of. The 121 patent families in this dataset span filings from 2015 through mid-2026, concentrated in water treatment (C02F), alkali-metal and alkaline-earth compound chemistry (C01D, C01F), and physical separation hardware (B01D).
Filing activity is not building toward a clear inflection point. The peak year to date is 2022, and the most recent full year sits below that level — though publication lag of roughly 18 months means 2025 and 2026 counts will rise somewhat as later filings publish. Receiving-office data shows the United States and India as the two largest filing destinations, with PCT, Australian, European and Canadian filings trailing behind.
Filing trend and technology composition
121 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, indexed against IPC subclass and receiving office to show where claim density sits and where it thins out.
A flat filing curve since 2022
Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 11 in 2022, then eased back toward 8 in 2026. Because 2022 is the midpoint of the observed range and later years have not exceeded it, this reads as a mature or plateauing filing pattern rather than one still accelerating — keeping in mind that the newest filings are always undercounted at the point of data capture.
Four subclasses hold most of the claim space
C02F (water and wastewater treatment, 50 records), C01D (alkali-metal compounds, 47), B01D (separation processes, 43) and C01F (alkaline-earth, aluminium and rare-earth compounds, 42) each cover roughly a third or more of the dataset. B09B (solid waste disposal, 27) is a secondary cluster. C01B, C22B and C23C — non-metallic element chemistry, metal extraction/refining, and coating/surface deposition — each carry single-digit counts, marking them as thin ground relative to the core water-treatment and precipitation chemistry.
Shares are the percentage of the 121 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Zero Liquid Discharge Heavy Metal Removal with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about zero liquid discharge heavy metal removal and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records in this corpus
Plant for the desalination/purification of brackish water and industrial waste with zero liquid discharge
Describes a combined heat-and-power ZLD plant integrating reverse osmosis or filtering modules, waste-receiving containers, a centrifugal module, dryers, a heating circuit and high-vacuum chambers with ejectors driven by fresh water, plus an internal combustion engine coupled to an alternator for on-site power generation.Filed by Jose Clavel Escribano, published 2009-02-19.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20120267307A1 | Osmotic separation systems and methods | 91 |
| 2 | WO2017133511A1 | 脱硫废水零排放处理的装置及方法 | 79 |
| 3 | WO2017133512A1 | 一种脱硫废水零排放处理装置及方法 | 26 |
| 4 | US20090045116A1 | Plant for the desalination/purification of brackish water and industrial waste with zero liquid discharge | 20 |
| 5 | US9039899B2 | Osmotic separation systems and methods | 15 |
| 6 | US20200261858A1 | Permeable graphene and permeable graphene membranes | 14 |
| 7 | US20210047203A1 | Method and device for continuous salt extraction from brine | 13 |
| 8 | WO2018161116A1 | Permeable graphene and permeable graphene membranes | 12 |
| 9 | EP1982958A1 | Plant for the desalination/purification of brackish water and industrial waste with zero liquid discharge | 12 |
| 10 | US20150086452A1 | Process for manufacture of sodium hydroxide and sodium chloride products from waste brine | 11 |
Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of what the field has built on, not of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC composition and citation data are read together.
The field has plateaued, not accelerated
A filing curve that peaks at the midpoint of the observed window and does not exceed that peak in later years suggests the core process claims — osmotic separation, selective precipitation, brine crystallization — were staked out early. New entrants are more likely to find open ground in downstream metal recovery than in the core ZLD process itself.
Four subclasses absorb most of the filing activity
Water treatment, alkali/alkaline-earth compound chemistry and physical separation together account for the bulk of records. Filing a broad process claim in these subclasses now means competing against a dense, multi-decade prior art base rather than opening new territory.
Development is overwhelmingly single-assignee
Only two co-filing relationships appear in the dataset, one of them a research-institute pairing filing at meaningfully higher volume than the other. That scarcity of joint filings points to a field where IP is being built inside single organizations rather than through cross-licensed consortia.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to zero liquid discharge heavy metal removal, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the field is still open
Assignee activity is led by a small set of research institutes and water-technology firms, with most other filers appearing once or twice in the dataset.
A single research collaboration dominates joint filing
The strongest co-assignee relationship in the dataset — a national science research organization paired with a technology university — accounts for the only substantial joint-filing volume observed. No other pairing approaches this scale.
Momentum has largely stalled across named assignees
Most tracked assignees show zero filings in the most recent year, with only one entity registering as many as two. That pattern, combined with the flat overall trend, suggests the active filer base has narrowed rather than expanded.
US and India lead receiving offices, Europe and Canada trail
The United States and India together account for a large share of filings, ahead of PCT applications and Australian, European and Canadian offices. Freedom-to-operate work should weight US and Indian prior art most heavily, then check PCT family members for downstream jurisdictions.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Innovative Energy LLC | 2 | — |
| Easy Mining Sweden AB | 0 | — |
| Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) | 0 | — |
| Oasys Water, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) | 0 | — |
| Queensland University of Technology | 0 | — |
| Albemarle Corporation | 0 | — |
| Datang Environment Industry Group Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a plateaued core process with thin coverage in adjacent metal-recovery chemistry. Two directions follow from that.
Map claim scope against the four dominant IPC subclasses
Before drafting in C02F, C01D, B01D or C01F, run a freedom-to-operate check against the highest-cited records in this corpus, since those subclasses carry the densest and oldest prior art.
Explore the IPC breakdown in EurekaAssess the under-claimed metal-recovery branches
C22B and C23C show single-digit filing counts relative to the core water-treatment classes, which may indicate either genuine white space or simply that metal-recovery chemistry has not yet been claimed as ZLD-specific.
Search adjacent branches in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
It refers to processes that combine brine minimization or zero liquid discharge treatment — concentrating wastewater to eliminate liquid effluent — with heavy metal recovery or selective precipitation from that brine before final crystallization or disposal. In this dataset the search combines ZLD and brine-minimization terms with heavy-metal-removal, metal-recovery-from-brine, and selective-precipitation terms across 121 patent families. Most records fall under water treatment (C02F), alkali/alkaline-earth compound chemistry (C01D, C01F) and separation processes (B01D), reflecting that the core technical work is chemical precipitation and physical separation rather than metallurgical extraction.
Filing activity rose from 2 families in 2017 to a peak of 11 in 2022, then declined to 8 by 2026, which sits below the 2022 peak rather than above it. That pattern reads as a plateau rather than sustained growth, though the most recent one to two years are always undercounted because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. A practitioner should treat the 2025-2026 figures as a floor, not a ceiling, but should not assume the field is currently accelerating based on the data available.
The dataset shows a small set of research institutes and water-technology firms as the most active filers, with one research-institute pairing — a national science and industry research organization filing jointly with a technology university — responsible for the largest co-assignee filing volume observed. Beyond that pairing, co-filing is rare across the corpus, with only two co-assignee relationships identified in total. Most other named assignees appear at low volume and show little to no filing activity in the most recent year, suggesting a narrow and somewhat static leader group rather than a broad competitive field.
The four dominant IPC subclasses — water treatment, alkali-metal compounds, separation processes and alkaline-earth/rare-earth compounds — carry the bulk of the 121 families and the densest prior art, including the most-cited records in the corpus. By contrast, metal extraction and refining (C22B) and coating/surface deposition (C23C) each show only single-digit record counts, as does non-metallic inorganic compound chemistry (C01B). That imbalance points toward selective precipitation reagent chemistry and brine-to-metal recovery process integration as comparatively under-claimed branches worth a closer freedom-to-operate check before assuming they are occupied.
US20090045116A1 describes a combined heat-and-power ZLD plant that integrates reverse osmosis or filtering modules with a centrifugal module, dryers, a heating circuit, high-vacuum ejector chambers and an on-site internal combustion engine and alternator for power generation. It is one of the most-cited records in this corpus, indicating it has shaped a meaningful share of later filings in the space, though its 2009 priority date means many of its specific hardware claims may have already been designed around or may be nearing expiry depending on jurisdiction. Anyone building a similarly integrated plant — particularly one combining desalination, waste treatment and on-site power generation in a single system — should review its claim scope directly rather than relying on the abstract alone, since the specific combination of components, not the general ZLD concept, is what a claim of this type typically protects.
Research Zero Liquid Discharge Heavy Metal Removal in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole zero liquid discharge heavy metal removal corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.