Unilever vs P&G – reacting to changing consumer needs
Unilever and Procter & Gamble are two of the biggest multinational consumer goods brands in the world and, together, they are responsible for the majority of products in your local supermarket. As of March 2018, Unilever is valued at $143.9 billion and P&G is valued at $228.1 billion. It is clear which is the bigger of the two companies and this disparity is reflected in a comparison of their patent portfolios.
$228.1 billion. It is clear which is the bigger of the two companies and this disparity is reflected in a comparison of their patent portfolios.
So, what’s going on with these two titans once we dig beneath the surface?
One of the persistent trends in the consumer goods market is the need to produce environmentally-friendly products. Consumers are not only more aware of the impact that products have on the planet, but are also far less willing to compromise on their values. There are two ways in which Unilever is tackling this changing customer profile:
-
Changing its current products
To maintain its high sales volumes, Unilever has stopped testing on animals and added a corrosive warning sign to some products, for example. Having a corrosive warning sign may have previously been deemed too negative. Now, it’s perceived as a signal to consumers about the company’s commitment to ending product testing on animals.
-
Acquiring sustainable companies
By welcoming new brands, Unilever is expanding its portfolio to include more sustainable products without having to alter the formulation of existing product lines (which normally takes a large cut out of the R&D budget). For example, Unilever acquired a sustainable cleaning products company called Seventh Generation—we just hope it’s learned the IP dangers in M&A deals and the strategies.
In 2009, Unilever launched “The Compass”, clearly indicating a “determination to build a sustainable business for the long term.” Then in 2010, Unilever launched “The Unilever Sustainable Living Plan”, which was dubbed the blueprint for The Compass.
Using PatSnap Insights, we were able to see the patent abandonment and renewal rates for Unilever and its number one competitor—P&G. The graph below suggests P&G is in defence mode and letting its patents expire, while Unilever is in growth mode and keeping hold of its patents.
P&G has also been losing market share, within some product categories, to Unilever. For example, in just three years, Dollar Shave Club chipped away at Gillette’s dominance to grab 8% of the $3 billion U.S. market for razors and blades. The strategic purchase of Dollar Shave Club and similarly popular companies by Unilever means that it will inherit their market share. The question we had this time last year remains:
“What is P&G going to do next to improve its market share and sales?”
FREE eBook: Using patent data for market intelligence and investment research
In this paper, we explore four key areas in which intellectual property (IP) data can support rapid and comprehensive market research—for R&D, IP and commercial teams.
Your recommended content
-
All Charged Up: Power Batteries & The Patent Race Shaping the Future of Electric Mobility
Category: Article | Category: battery technology | Category: electric vehicle | Category: EV | Category: lithium ion | Category: lithium ion battery | Category: NEV | Category: new energy vehicles
Monday, April 22, 2024
In the ever-evolving landscape of innovation, the electric vehicle (EV) industry stands as a beacon of technological transformation. As nations...
-
The People vs. AI: Who Owns Ideas in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence?
Category: AI era | Category: AI-driven creativity | Category: AI-generated creations | Category: Article | Category: copyright and patent rights | Category: digital innovation | Category: innovation | Category: intellectual property law | Category: legal implications | Category: OpenAI Sora | Category: patent law | Category: Research Tag | Category: Sora | Category: text-to-video generative AI | Category: who owns AI
Monday, April 22, 2024
In the ever-evolving landscape of technological innovation, OpenAI's Sora emerges as a groundbreaking force, blurring the lines between human creativity and artificial intelligence. As the forefront of text-to-video generative AI, Sora's capabilities have ignited profound discussions around copyright and patent rights, challenging established legal frameworks and prompting a reevaluation of intellectual property rights in the digital age. With its capacity to generate high-quality footage based on mere prompts, Sora exemplifies the potential of AI-driven creativity, yet it also raises complex ownership dilemmas and ethical considerations. As we navigate this uncharted territory, it becomes imperative to explore the intersection of intellectual property law and AI technology, deciphering the legal challenges and implications posed by AI-generated creations. From the nuances of copyright law to the ethical dimensions of AI development, this editorial delves into the multifaceted landscape of Sora's impact, offering insights into the future of innovation and ownership in the AI era.
-
Patsnap Releases 2023 Global Innovation Report: The Brilliant Names to the Dynamic Landscape of Innovation
Category: Article | Category: eBook | Category: Research Tag | Category: Whitepaper
Wednesday, November 15, 2023
The Global Innovation 100 and Global Disruption 50 transcend individual entities, each representing a small innovation ecosystem with numerous subsidiaries. Through the innovation data of these companies, we gain insights into the characteristics, structures, and trends of global innovation.