Patent Litigation in Computing Based on Ai Models

10 cases on record

Cases on record: 10
Classification: G06N99/00 · G06Q30/02 · G06N20/00 · G06N20/20 · G06N3/08 · G06N3/04 · G06N7/00 · G06F11/30 · B60T8/174 · B60W50/00 · F02D41/14 · F02D41/24 · F02D41/26 · F02D41/30 · G05B13/02 · G06F15/18 · G07C5/08 · G06N5/02 · G06K9/62 · G06F19/00 · G06N20/10 · G06Q10/06 · G06Q20/10 · G06Q50/22 · G06T7/00 · G06V10/764 · G06V10/771 · G06V10/774 · G16B40/20 · G16B40/30 · G06N5/04
Courts involved: E.D. Va. · W.D. Tex. · W.D.N.C. · S.D.N.Y. · E.D. Tex. · Fed. Cir.

Case no.	Parties	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
1:25-cv-00757	Web3AI Technologies, LLC v. Microstrategy, Inc.	E.D. Va.	1 May 2025	4 d	Case Transferred
7:25-cv-00166	Tesseract Systems LLC v. The Mitre Corporation	W.D. Tex.	16 Apr 2025	128 d	Voluntary dismissal
3:24-cv-00928	OBD Sensor Solutions, LLC v. Linxup, LLC	W.D.N.C.	21 Oct 2024	101 d	Voluntary dismissal
1:24-cv-07557	OBD Sensor Solutions, LLC v. Lemonade, Inc.	S.D.N.Y.	4 Oct 2024	129 d	Voluntary dismissal
2:24-cv-00153	OBD Sensor Solutions, LLC v. Verizon Connect, Inc.	E.D. Tex.	4 Mar 2024	177 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
23-1967	Xerox, Corp. v. Snap, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	1 Jun 2023	686 d	Appeal Dismissed
23-1968	Xerox, Corp. v. X, Corp.	Fed. Cir.	1 Jun 2023	686 d	Appeal Dismissed
23-1728	Intel Corporation v. Health Discovery, Corp.	Fed. Cir.	10 Apr 2023	156 d	Appeal Dismissed
23-1425	In Re: William Starrett Jr. v. Katherine K. Vidal	Fed. Cir.	24 Jan 2023	325 d	Unpatentable
22-1397	USC IP Partnership, LP v. Facebook, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	25 Jan 2022	582 d	Appeal Dismissed

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Computing Based on Ai Models. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Computing Based on Ai Models Patent litigation record

10 cases on record

Where the claim space is crowded