30 cases on record
- Cases on record
- 30
- Classification
- B65D25/10 · B65D43/16 · B65D81/38 · F21V33/00 · B65D85/18 · B65D43/24 · B65D21/02 · B65D85/00 · G08B13/00 · G21K1/00 · G21K1/12 · H05G1/60 · H05G1/00 · A47G19/03 · A47G23/06 · B65D1/34 · B65D25/20 · G09F23/00 · B65D85/36 · B65D81/02 · B65D65/16 · B65D75/00 · B65B25/00 · B65B11/00 · A61K31/519 · A61K9/00 · B65D85/804 · A47J31/44 · B65D65/46 · B65D21/08 · A47B3/091 · A47D7/00 · A47D9/00 · B65D5/20 · B65D6/18 · B65D25/24 · D06F95/00 · F16M11/10 · F16M11/20 · F16M11/38 · A01K13/00 · B65D43/02 · B65D47/06 · A47G23/02 · A47J41/00 · A47G19/23 · B65D1/44 · A45F3/20 · B65D1/00 · B65D1/42 · B65D1/26 · B65D1/16 · B65D17/28 · B65D25/08 · B65D51/28 · B32B9/02 · B32B9/04 · B32B9/06 · B32B3/28 · B31D5/00 · B31B50/26 · B31B120/40 · B65D6/06 · B65D85/10 · B65D50/02 · B65D5/38 · B65D77/04 · B65D59/04 · B65D77/22 · B65D75/58 · B65D77/02 · B65B5/06 · A45D37/00 · A61Q19/00 · A61Q3/00 · A61K8/92 · A61K8/9706 · A61K8/9789 · A61K8/9794 · A45D34/02 · A45D40/00 · B65D33/04 · B65D85/34 · B65D33/25 · B65D33/08 · B65D30/00 · B65D33/00 · A47J31/40 · A47J31/36 · B65D6/08 · B65D6/32 · B65D6/36 · B65D25/00 · A47B55/02 · A47B67/04 · B65D21/032 · B65D51/24 · B65D41/02 · G06K7/00 · G01K1/02 · G01K1/14 · G06K19/07 · G06K19/063 · B65D90/04 · B65D88/00 · B66C1/22 · B66C1/10 · B65D88/16 · B65D47/40 · B65D23/06 · B65D51/04
- Courts involved
- W.D. Tenn. · N.D. Ill. · Fed. Cir. · E.D. Va. · D. Or. · C.D. Cal. · S.D. Ill. · E.D.N.Y. · N.D. Cal. · S.D. Ohio · D. Mass. · S.D. Tex. · E.D. Wis. · N.D. Iowa · C.D. Ill. · E.D. Tex. · E.D. Tenn. · Court of Justice of Sao Paulo
| Case no. | Parties | Court | Filed | Duration | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2:25-cv-03153 | California Innovations, Inc. v. Fuse, LLC | W.D. Tenn. | 19 Dec 2025 | 89 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:25-cv-10257 | Taizhou Shengwan Home Furnishing Co., Ltd., v. NNovative Closet Accessories LLC | N.D. Ill. | 27 Aug 2025 | 226 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 25-1991 | United States and Trademark Office v. Securitypoint Holdings | Fed. Cir. | 5 Aug 2025 | 238 d | Case Dismissed |
| 1:25-cv-03739 | Pizza Pack LLC v. Brumis Imports, Inc. | N.D. Ill. | 7 Apr 2025 | 161 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 25-1255 | In re: DOUGLAS PAUL RAGGIO v. DERRICK BRENT, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office | Fed. Cir. | 5 Dec 2024 | 197 d | Case Remanded |
| 25-1182 | K-Fee System, GmbH v. Nespresso USA, Inc. | Fed. Cir. | 15 Nov 2024 | 243 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:24-cv-01855 | Tan Grow, Inc. v. The Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A | E.D. Va. | 21 Oct 2024 | 268 d | Default Judgment |
| 3:24-cv-01764 | Pizza Pack, LLC v. Target, Corp. | D. Or. | 18 Oct 2024 | 292 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 8:24-cv-02205 | Meyer Intellectual Properties Ltd. v. Sharkninja Operating, LLC | C.D. Cal. | 10 Oct 2024 | 153 d | Case Settled |
| 3:24-cv-02043 | Brumate, Inc. v. Frost Buddy LLC | S.D. Ill. | 26 Aug 2024 | 400 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 1:24-cv-05807 | Huhtamaki, Inc. v. MaxHome Products, LLC | E.D.N.Y. | 20 Aug 2024 | 169 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:24-cv-07044 | Huhtamaki, Inc. v. GoodCo Products LLC | N.D. Ill. | 9 Aug 2024 | 133 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 5:24-cv-04412 | Buzzballz, LLC v. MPL Brands NV, Inc. | N.D. Cal. | 22 Jul 2024 | 235 d | Case Stayed |
| 1:24-cv-04315 | StarOne Intellectual Property Group Ltd. v. Axlab Inc. | N.D. Ill. | 24 May 2024 | 174 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 2:24-cv-02852 | StarOne Intellectual Property Group Ltd. v. Cardinal Health, Inc. | S.D. Ohio | 22 May 2024 | 176 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 5:24-cv-01282 | MPL Brands NV, Inc v. Buzzballz, LLC | N.D. Cal. | 1 Mar 2024 | 312 d | Case Dismissed |
| 1:23-cv-01761 | Vericool World, LLC v. Temperpack Technologies, Inc. | E.D. Va. | 21 Dec 2023 | 634 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 1:23-cv-11990 | Contempo Card, Co. v. Superior Bindery, Inc. | D. Mass. | 29 Aug 2023 | 707 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 4:23-cv-02340 | Voesh Corporation v. J & K Beauty Supply, LLC | S.D. Tex. | 26 Jun 2023 | 711 d | Default Judgment |
| 2:23-cv-02672 | Voesh Corporation v. Codi N Codi, Inc. | E.D.N.Y. | 10 Apr 2023 | 157 d | Case Dismissed |
| 2:23-cv-00307 | The Fresh Group, Ltd. v. Elkay Plastics Co., Inc | E.D. Wis. | 7 Mar 2023 | 94 d | Dismissed without Prejudice |
| 2:22-cv-09295 | Nespresso USA, Inc. v. K-fee System, GmbH | C.D. Cal. | 22 Dec 2022 | 930 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 1:22-cv-00146 | Reynolds Presto Products, Inc. v. Elplast America, Inc | N.D. Iowa | 1 Dec 2022 | 123 d | Voluntary dismissal |
| 22-2042 | K-Fee System, GmbH v. Nespresso USA, Inc. | Fed. Cir. | 19 Jul 2022 | 525 d | Case Reversed |
| 3:22-cv-03014 | Knape & Vogt Manufacturing, Co. v. Design Ideas, Ltd. | C.D. Ill. | 11 Feb 2022 | 327 d | Consent Judgment |
| 2:22-cv-00023 | GeoTag IP, LLC v. AMS Sensors USA, Inc. | E.D. Tex. | 20 Jan 2022 | 428 d | Consent Judgment |
| 2:21-cv-03402 | K-fee System, GmbH v. Nespresso USA, Inc. | C.D. Cal. | 21 Apr 2021 | 1540 d | Dismissed with Prejudice |
| 1:18-cv-00118 | Pac-Tec, Inc. v. I.C.E. Service Group, Inc. | E.D. Tenn. | 1 Jun 2018 | 1684 d | Case Dismissed |
| 2070583-73.2023.8.26.0000 | Plastek do Brasil Indústria e Comércio Ltda. v. Revpack Tecnologia e Comércio de Componentes Plásticos Ltda. | Court of Justice of Sao Paulo | – | Appeal Dismissed | |
| 2070583-73.2023.8.26.0000/50000 | Plastek do Brasil Indústria and Comércio Ltda v. Revpack Tecnologia and Comércio de Componentes Plásticos Ltda | Court of Justice of Sao Paulo | – | Appeal Dismissed |
Where the claim space is crowded
Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.
Map this field- 01Ranked prior artEvery hit source-linked
- 02Claim-level comparisonAgainst your own product
- 03Legal statusAcross 174 jurisdictions
About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.
Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.
No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.
No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.
Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.
Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.
Report an incorrect record
Tell us what is wrong on this page. The page address is included automatically.
Privacy request
For requests about your personal information on this page. The page address is included automatically.