Electric Digital Data Processing and Business, Commerce & Admin Data Processing Patent litigation record

Technology 14 cases

14 cases on record in Electric Digital Data Processing and Business, Commerce & Admin Data Processing. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

14 cases on record

Cases on record
14
Classification
G06F19/00 · G06Q10/00 · G16H10/60 · G06F7/08 · G06Q20/38 · G06Q20/40 · G06Q40/08 · G07F19/00 · G06K5/00 · G06Q20/42 · G06Q20/10 · G06Q20/32 · G06F30/23 · G06Q50/18 · A61F2/28 · G06N5/02 · G06Q30/02 · G06N3/12 · H04N21/25 · G06Q30/00 · G06Q30/0242 · G06Q30/0241 · G06F11/14 · G06F15/173 · G06Q30/06 · G06Q40/00 · G11B20/10 · H04L29/12 · H04N5/00 · H04N7/16 · H04N7/173 · H04N11/00 · G06F3/00 · G16Z99/00 · G06F15/16 · G07G1/14 · G06F11/00 · G06Q99/00 · A63F5/04 · A63F13/73
Courts involved
Fed. Cir. · E.D. Tex. · N.D. Cal. · W.D. Tex.
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
25-1289 Decapolis Systems, LLC v. Epic Systems, Corp. Fed. Cir. 16 Dec 2024 302 d Voluntary dismissal
2:24-cv-00621 Amadora Systems LLC v. Truist Bank E.D. Tex. 31 Jul 2024 184 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00622 Amadora Systems LLC v. VeraBank, N.A. E.D. Tex. 31 Jul 2024 303 d Dismissed with Prejudice
3:23-cv-06151 X, Corp. v. Adeia, Inc. N.D. Cal. 28 Nov 2023 216 d Dismissed without Prejudice
4:22-cv-08298 Precision Point Devices LLC v. Asustek Computer, Inc. N.D. Cal. 13 Dec 2022 169 d Case Dismissed
23-1176 DDR Holdings, LLC v. Priceline Group, Inc. Fed. Cir. 22 Nov 2022 748 d Appeal Dismissed
23-1177 DDR Holdings, LLC v. Booking.com, B.V. Fed. Cir. 22 Nov 2022 748 d Appeal Dismissed
6:22-cv-01204 AlmondNet, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. W.D. Tex. 18 Nov 2022 195 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:22-cv-01205 AlmondNet, Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. W.D. Tex. 18 Nov 2022 73 d Case Transferred
6:22-cv-01206 AlmondNet, Inc. v. Microsoft, Co. W.D. Tex. 18 Nov 2022 143 d Case Consolidated
2:22-cv-00407 Decapolis Systems, LLC v. Steward Health Care Network, Inc. E.D. Tex. 18 Oct 2022 99 d Case Dismissed
2:22-cv-00408 Decapolis Systems, LLC v. Knight Health Holdings, LLC E.D. Tex. 18 Oct 2022 884 d Voluntary dismissal
2:22-cv-00173 Decapolis Systems, LLC v. Texas Retina Associates E.D. Tex. 24 May 2022 246 d Consent Judgment
3:19-cv-07027 Bot M8, LLC v. Sony, Corp. N.D. Cal. 25 Oct 2019 1498 d Dismissed with Prejudice
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Electric Digital Data Processing and Business, Commerce & Admin Data Processing. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information — including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing — use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.