Image Data Processing & Generation Patent litigation record

Technology 20 cases

20 cases on record in Image Data Processing & Generation. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Map this field in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

20 cases on record

Cases on record
20
Classification
G06T15/00 · G06T17/20 · G06T7/73 · G06T7/80 · G06K9/62 · G06T7/50 · G06T1/00 · G06T19/20 · G06N3/04 · G06N3/08 · G06T7/33 · H04N23/40 · G06T13/00 · G06F3/00 · G06F17/30 · G06T13/80 · G09G5/00 · H04N7/14 · G06T19/00 · G06T17/05 · H04N5/247 · G06T11/60 · H04N5/232 · H04N5/225 · H04N5/335 · G06F3/01 · H04N23/90 · H04N25/00 · G06T7/00 · A61B1/05 · H04N5/265 · G06T7/30 · A61B1/00 · A61B1/31 · G06T7/70 · H04N23/80 · G06T7/40 · G06T1/20 · G06T1/40 · G06T5/40 · G06T3/00 · G06T7/60 · H04N1/387 · H04N1/40 · H04N1/405 · G06T15/10 · G06T15/40 · G06T15/50 · G06T17/00 · G06T9/00 · H04N7/26 · H04N7/32 · H03M7/36 · H04N7/50
Courts involved
M.D. Fla. · Fed. Cir. · E.D. Tex. · E.D. Va. · E.D. Pa. · D. Del. · W.D. Tex. · W.D. Wash. · E.D.N.C.
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
8:25-cv-02329 Artificial Intelligence Imaging Association, Inc. v. MVision AI, Inc. M.D. Fla. 2 Sep 2025 43 d Voluntary dismissal
25-1445 Reald Spark, LLC v. Microsoft, Co. Fed. Cir. 13 Feb 2025 139 d Appeal Dismissed
2:24-cv-00851 Gamehancement, LLC v. Synthesia Ltd E.D. Tex. 19 Oct 2024 19 d Voluntary dismissal
3:24-cv-00740 Gamehancement, LLC v. Footage Firm, Inc. E.D. Va. 19 Oct 2024 326 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:24-cv-00831 Gamehancement, LLC v. Ascensio Systems, Inc. E.D. Tex. 14 Oct 2024 95 d Voluntary dismissal
2:24-cv-03188 Geosymm Ventures LLC v. Kinetic Vision Media Corp E.D. Pa. 19 Jul 2024 154 d Voluntary dismissal
1:24-cv-00837 GeoSymm Ventures, LLC v. Magic Leap, Inc. D. Del. 18 Jul 2024 146 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00417 C47 Technologies LLC v. TCL Technology Group Corporation f/k/a TCL Corporation E.D. Tex. 4 Jun 2024 451 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:24-cv-00406 C47 Technologies LLC v. Lenovo, Inc. E.D. Tex. 3 Jun 2024 457 d Voluntary dismissal
2:24-cv-00372 C47 Technologies LLC v. Lenovo (Shanghai) Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. E.D. Tex. 17 May 2024 474 d Voluntary dismissal
24-1001 Psip, LLC v. Katherine K. Vidal Fed. Cir. 2 Oct 2023 78 d Case Remanded
23-2136 Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc. Fed. Cir. 10 Jul 2023 569 d Appeal Dismissed
6:22-cv-01237 Bassfield IP, LLC v. Brookfield Residential Properties, Inc. W.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2022 107 d Voluntary dismissal
6:22-cv-01238 Bassfield IP, LLC v. Outfront Media, Inc. W.D. Tex. 30 Nov 2022 111 d Voluntary dismissal
6:22-cv-01122 Bassfield IP, LLC v. Total Quality Logistics, LLC W.D. Tex. 26 Oct 2022 148 d Consent Judgment
6:22-cv-01010 Bassfield IP, LLC v. Paypal, Inc. W.D. Tex. 28 Sep 2022 128 d Consent Judgment
2:22-cv-00942 Reald Spark LLC v. Microsoft, Co. W.D. Wash. 7 Jul 2022 1429 d Voluntary dismissal
2:22-cv-00077 Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc. E.D. Tex. 11 Mar 2022 468 d Dismissed without Prejudice
5:19-cv-00516 Infernal Technology, LLC v. Epic Games, Inc. E.D.N.C. 14 Nov 2019 1378 d Case Stayed
2:18-cv-00500 Uniloc 2017, LLC v. Google, LLC E.D. Tex. 17 Nov 2018 1523 d Case Dismissed
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Image Data Processing & Generation. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information — including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing — use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.