Patent Litigation in Material Analysis & Testing

15 cases on record

Cases on record: 15
Classification: G01N33/00 · G01N33/53 · C07K16/44 · G01N33/542 · G01N33/68 · G01N33/94 · G01N33/543 · G01N33/15 · A61K38/29 · G01N33/48 · G01N27/26 · G01N31/22 · G01N33/487 · G01N33/558 · G01N1/30 · A61B10/00 · B01L3/00 · G01N1/10 · G01N1/00 · G01N33/483 · G01N27/02 · C12Q1/68 · G01N21/64 · C12Q1/6825 · C12Q1/6851 · G01N33/50 · G06F19/20 · G06F19/12 · G06F19/24 · G06F17/10 · G06F17/11 · G16B45/00 · G16B25/00 · G16B5/00 · G16B25/20 · G16B40/10 · G16B40/00 · G01N23/20 · H05G1/00 · A61B6/08 · G01N23/201 · G01N23/203 · G01N23/04 · G01V5/00 · G01N33/493 · G01N33/70 · G01N33/62 · G01N31/00 · A61K31/17 · A61K31/4168 · A61K33/00 · A61K45/06 · G01N27/72 · A61B · A61B5/05 · G01V3/08 · G01N37/00 · G01N33/537 · G01N33/536 · C12N5/076 · C12Q1/02 · A01N1/02 · C12M1/34 · C12N5/071 · C12Q1/04 · G01N15/00 · G01N15/14
Courts involved: D. Del. · D. Mass. · Fed. Cir. · C.D. Cal. · D. Nev. · N.D. Ohio · W.D. Wis.

Case no.	Parties	Court	Filed	Duration	Outcome
1:25-cv-00661	VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Ltd. v. Diazyme Laboratories, Inc.	D. Del.	29 May 2025	333 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
1:25-cv-00659	Fujirebio Diagnostics, Inc. v. Quanterix Corporation	D. Del.	28 May 2025	317 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
1:24-cv-11770	Radius Health, Inc. v. Orbicular Pharmaceutical Technologies Private Limited	D. Mass.	10 Jul 2024	531 d	Case Stayed
1:24-cv-00668	Roche Diabetes Care, Inc. v. Trividia Health, Inc.	D. Del.	4 Jun 2024	500 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
24-1840	DNA Genotek, Inc. v. Spectrum Solutions, LLC	Fed. Cir.	21 May 2024	37 d	Appeal Dismissed
1:24-cv-00300	Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Axion BioSystems, Inc.	D. Del.	6 Mar 2024	790 d	Case Settled
2:23-cv-08417	Chromacode, Inc. v. Bio-Rad Laboratories	C.D. Cal.	5 Oct 2023	63 d	Case Transferred
23-2211	Sigray, Inc. v. Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc.	Fed. Cir.	28 Jul 2023	665 d	Appeal Dismissed in Part
23-2127	American Science and Engineering, Inc. v. Viken Detection, Corp.	Fed. Cir.	7 Jul 2023	762 d	Vacated and Remanded
23-2101	American Science and Engineering, Inc. v. Viken Detection, Corp.	Fed. Cir.	30 Jun 2023	742 d	Unpatentable
22-1445	Leica Microsystems, Inc. v. The Regents of the University Of Michigan	Fed. Cir.	4 Feb 2022	444 d	Unpatentable
2:22-cv-00158	Aim High Investment Group, LLC v. Spectrum Laboratories, LLC	D. Nev.	28 Jan 2022	964 d	Default Judgment
1:21-cv-01216	Kopp Development Inc. v. Metrasens, Inc.	N.D. Ohio	21 Jun 2021	1362 d	Dismissed with Prejudice
21-1796	Rembrandt Diagnostics, LP v. Alere Inc	Fed. Cir.	31 Mar 2021	863 d	Unpatentable
3:20-cv-00085	Inguran, LLC v. ABS Global, Inc.	W.D. Wis.	29 Jan 2020	1449 d	Dismissed with Prejudice

Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Material Analysis & Testing. Run this in Eureka

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Material Analysis & Testing Patent litigation record

15 cases on record

Where the claim space is crowded