Power Conversion (Ac/Dc etc.) Patent litigation record

Technology 16 cases

16 cases on record in Power Conversion (Ac/Dc etc.). Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Map this field in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

16 cases on record

Cases on record
16
Classification
H02M3/335 · H02J7/00 · H02M1/36 · H01R13/66 · H01R13/703 · H01R24/76 · H02M3/07 · H02M3/158 · H02M1/00 · H02M3/156 · H05K3/40 · H01F27/28 · H05K1/11 · H05K3/30 · H01F27/24 · H05K3/22 · H05K1/02 · H05K1/18 · H05K1/14 · H10W70/40 · H02M3/337 · H02M3/28 · H02M3/00 · H02M7/00 · H02J1/10 · H02M3/24 · H02M3/325 · H01K7/06
Courts involved
Fed. Cir. · N.D. Tex. · N.D. Ill. · D. Del. · W.D. Tex. · E.D. Tex. · United States International Trade Commission
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
26-1559 CogniPower, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Fed. Cir. 24 Mar 2026 10 d Voluntary dismissal
3:26-cv-00072 Electrasense Technologies LLC v. Legrand North America LLC N.D. Tex. 12 Jan 2026 86 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:25-cv-04500 Xyz LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A N.D. Ill. 25 Apr 2025 182 d Case Dismissed
1:25-cv-00066 CogniPower, LLC v. Fantasia Trading, LLC D. Del. 16 Jan 2025 246 d Voluntary dismissal
25-1344 Sma Solar Technology America, LLC v. Tigo Energy, Inc. Fed. Cir. 6 Jan 2025 126 d Appeal Dismissed
1:24-cv-12602 Electrasense Technologies, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations identified in Schedule A N.D. Ill. 9 Dec 2024 109 d Voluntary dismissal
1:24-cv-09499 Electrasense Technologies, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations identified in Schedule A N.D. Ill. 4 Oct 2024 154 d Voluntary dismissal
1:23-cv-01246 Delta Electronics, Inc. v. Vicor Corporation D. Del. 1 Nov 2023 554 d Dismissed with Prejudice
6:23-cv-00726 Delta Electronics, Inc. v. Vicor Corporation W.D. Tex. 23 Oct 2023 562 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:23-cv-00323 Vicor Corporation v. Delta Electronics, Inc. E.D. Tex. 12 Jul 2023 671 d Dismissed with Prejudice
337-TA-1370 Vicor Corporation v. Cyntec Co., Ltd. United States International Trade Commission 12 Jul 2023 582 d Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff
23-2022 Mypaq Holdings Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Fed. Cir. 15 Jun 2023 538 d Unpatentable
23-2024 Mypaq Holdings Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Fed. Cir. 15 Jun 2023 679 d Unpatentable
23-2025 Mypaq Holdings Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Fed. Cir. 15 Jun 2023 679 d Unpatentable
2:23-cv-00160 CogniPower, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. E.D. Tex. 10 Apr 2023 1094 d Case Dismissed
6:21-cv-00398 MyPAQ Holdings, Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. W.D. Tex. 23 Apr 2021 1504 d Dismissed with Prejudice
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Power Conversion (Ac/Dc etc.). Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information — including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing — use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.