Smokers' Requisites Patent litigation record

Technology 21 cases

21 cases on record in Smokers' Requisites. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Map this field in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

21 cases on record

Cases on record
21
Classification
A24F47/00 · A24F40/10 · A24F40/42 · A24F40/46 · A24F40/51 · H05B3/12 · H05B1/02 · G06F21/44 · A24F40/40 · A24F40/60 · A24F1/02 · A24F9/10 · A24F1/10 · A24F25/00 · A24F13/00 · A24F3/00 · A24D1/10 · A24F17/00 · A24F11/00 · A24F13/04 · A24F5/04 · A24D3/17 · A24F40/485 · A24F40/50 · A24F40/90 · A61M15/06 · A61M11/04 · H02J7/00 · A24F40/00 · A24F40/44 · A61M15/00 · A24F40/20 · A24F40/53 · G01L9/12 · A01G13/06 · A24F1/00 · A24F40/70 · A24F9/02 · H05B3/42 · H05B3/14 · A24B15/16 · A24B13/02 · A24D1/00 · A24B15/12 · A24D1/20
Courts involved
D.N.J. · U.S. Supreme Court · D. Colo. · N.D. Ga. · E.D. Mich. · C.D. Cal. · M.D.N.C. · United States International Trade Commission · E.D. Va. · Fed. Cir. · E.D.N.Y. · D. Ariz.
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
2:25-cv-14873 VPR Brands, LP v. Boulder International Inc D.N.J. 25 Aug 2025 220 d Case Dismissed
25-158 R. J. Reynolds Vapor Company v. Altria Client Services, LLC U.S. Supreme Court 7 Aug 2025 60 d Petition Dismissed
1:24-cv-03348 VPR Brands, LP v. O.pen Vape LLC D. Colo. 3 Dec 2024 7 d Voluntary dismissal
1:24-cv-04012 VPR Brands, LP v. Pop Vapor Co., LLC N.D. Ga. 6 Sep 2024 179 d Voluntary dismissal
4:24-cv-12190 VPR Brands, LP v. Ashh, Inc. E.D. Mich. 20 Aug 2024 307 d Case Dismissed
2:24-cv-07009 VPR Brands, LP v. Flumgio Technology Inc. C.D. Cal. 19 Aug 2024 291 d Case Settled
2:24-cv-06595 Solo Industries v. Herbonite, Inc. C.D. Cal. 5 Aug 2024 238 d Default Judgment
1:23-cv-00813 Healthier Choices Management, Corp. v. Reynolds American, Inc. M.D.N.C. 26 Sep 2023 428 d Case Stayed
337-TA-1368 Juul Labs, Inc. v. Altria Client Services, LLC United States International Trade Commission 30 Jun 2023 579 d Judgment on the merits for Plaintiff
3:23-cv-00348 Fuma International, LLC v. Altria Group, Inc. E.D. Va. 26 May 2023 0 d Case Transferred
23-1529 Healthier Choices Management, Corp. v. Philip Morris Products, SA Fed. Cir. 22 Feb 2023 639 d Unpatentable
2:22-cv-07638 Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co., Ltd. v. Greentank Technologies Corp. C.D. Cal. 19 Oct 2022 803 d Case Dismissed
1:22-cv-05829 Stock Your Home, LLC v. Lifted Limited, LLC E.D.N.Y. 29 Sep 2022 146 d Consent Judgment
2:22-cv-06709 SHO Products, LLC v. Puff, Corp. C.D. Cal. 19 Sep 2022 798 d Consent Judgment
22-1846 Philip Morris Products, SA v. Rai Strategic Holdings, Inc. Fed. Cir. 31 May 2022 471 d Patent Upheld
22-1748 Rai Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. Philip Morris Products, SA Fed. Cir. 3 May 2022 440 d Unpatentable
22-1563 Healthier Choices Management, Corp. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. Fed. Cir. 23 Mar 2022 385 d Reversed and Remanded
22-1268 Healthier Choices Management, Corp. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. Fed. Cir. 16 Dec 2021 482 d Reversed and Remanded
22-1227 Philip Morris Products, SA v. International Trade Commission Fed. Cir. 7 Dec 2021 479 d Appeal Dismissed
1:20-cv-04816 Healthier Choices Management, Corp. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. N.D. Ga. 30 Nov 2020 1492 d Dismissed without Prejudice
2:20-cv-02185 VPR Brands, LP v. Jupiter Research, LLC D. Ariz. 13 Nov 2020 929 d Case Dismissed
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Smokers' Requisites. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.