Traffic Control Systems Patent litigation record

Technology 27 cases

27 cases on record in Traffic Control Systems. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Map this field in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

27 cases on record

Cases on record
27
Classification
G08G1/123 · G01C21/00 · G08G1/0967 · B60Q9/00 · G01S19/51 · G08G1/09 · G08G1/00 · H04N7/18 · G08G1/017 · G08G1/04 · G08G5/00 · B64U50/37 · G08G1/095 · G08G1/07 · G08G1/0955 · G08G1/01 · H04B7/185
Courts involved
C.D. Cal. · N.D. Tex. · D. Del. · D. Mass. · E.D. Tex. · Fed. Cir. · W.D. Tex. · E.D. Va. · W.D. Wis. · S.D. Fla.
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
5:26-cv-01946 Optimum Vector Dynamics LLC v. Fantasia Trading, LLC C.D. Cal. 20 Apr 2026 15 d Voluntary dismissal
4:26-cv-00254 Navog, LLC v. Omnitracs, LLC N.D. Tex. 6 Mar 2026 19 d Case Dismissed
2:26-cv-00856 Optimum Vector Dynamics LLC v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC C.D. Cal. 28 Jan 2026 110 d Case Settled
1:26-cv-00032 Navog, LLC v. Powerfleet, Inc. D. Del. 12 Jan 2026 77 d Voluntary dismissal
1:25-cv-13081 Pivot Innovations, LLC v. Sea Machines Robotics, Inc. D. Mass. 21 Oct 2025 56 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00843 Monitor Systems LLC v. Sensys Gatso Group AB E.D. Tex. 22 Aug 2025 56 d Case Dismissed
2:25-cv-00630 LightSure LLC v. Parrot, Inc. E.D. Tex. 13 Jun 2025 322 d Voluntary dismissal
25-1841 Site 2020 Inc. v. Superior Traffic Services, LLC Fed. Cir. 9 Jun 2025 59 d Voluntary dismissal
7:25-cv-00260 LightSure LLC v. Applied Aeronautics, LLC W.D. Tex. 4 Jun 2025 294 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:25-cv-00333 Navog, LLC v. Samsara Networks, Inc. D. Del. 18 Mar 2025 16 d Dismissed with Prejudice
1:25-cv-00368 Monitor Systems LLC v. All Traffic Solutions, Inc. E.D. Va. 25 Feb 2025 2 d Case Transferred
2:25-cv-00236 Monitor Systems LLC v. Tattile, SRL E.D. Tex. 25 Feb 2025 146 d Voluntary dismissal
3:25-cv-00143 Monitor Systems LLC v. Traffic and Parking Control Co., LLC W.D. Wis. 25 Feb 2025 171 d Dismissed with Prejudice
7:25-cv-00089 Monitor Systems LLC v. Verra Mobility Corporation W.D. Tex. 25 Feb 2025 244 d Voluntary dismissal
2:25-cv-00234 Monitor Systems LLC v. Carmanah Technologies Corp. E.D. Tex. 24 Feb 2025 171 d Voluntary dismissal
0:25-cv-60328 Navog, LLC v. Garmin, Ltd. S.D. Fla. 19 Feb 2025 1 d Case Terminated
1:25-cv-20787 Navog, LLC v. Garmin, Ltd. S.D. Fla. 19 Feb 2025 34 d Voluntary dismissal
1:25-cv-10394 Navog, LLC v. TeleType Co., Inc. D. Mass. 17 Feb 2025 92 d Voluntary dismissal
23-2033 RideShare Displays, Inc. v. Lyft, Inc. Fed. Cir. 16 Jun 2023 836 d Appeal Dismissed in Part
23-2034 RideShare Displays, Inc. v. Lyft, Inc. Fed. Cir. 16 Jun 2023 836 d Appeal Dismissed in Part
23-2037 RideShare Displays, Inc. v. Lyft, Inc. Fed. Cir. 16 Jun 2023 836 d Appeal Dismissed in Part
23-2038 Lyft, Inc. v. RideShare Displays, Inc. Fed. Cir. 16 Jun 2023 836 d Appeal Dismissed in Part
9:23-cv-80233 Contiguity, LLC v. Jenoptik North America, Inc. S.D. Fla. 13 Feb 2023 81 d Voluntary dismissal
3:23-cv-00187 Contiguity, LLC v. Traffic Logix Corporation N.D. Tex. 25 Jan 2023 21 d Case Dismissed
3:23-cv-00160 Contiguity, LLC v. HIKVision USA, Inc. N.D. Tex. 20 Jan 2023 333 d Dismissed with Prejudice
23-1094 Platform Science, Inc. v. Omnitracs, LLC Fed. Cir. 27 Oct 2022 593 d Patent Upheld
1:20-cv-01629 RideShare Displays, Inc. v. Lyft, Inc. D. Del. 30 Nov 2020 2020 d Dismissed with Prejudice
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Traffic Control Systems. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.