Products
AI AGENTS
INTELLIGENCE SUITE
API, MCP & INTEGRATION
Solutions
INDUSTRIES
USE CASES
Pricing
Resources
EXPLORE
ENGAGE
SUPPORT & SERVICES
About
Patsnap Eureka Platform
IP Search Agents
IP Drafting Agents
Engineering Agents
Find Solutions with TRIZ
Life Sciences Agents
SAR Data Extraction
Materials Agents
SEP Agents
Patsnap Eureka Desktop
BetaAnalytics
IP IntelligenceHiro for Analytics
Synapse
Biopharma IntelligenceBio
Biosequence Search and AnalysisChemical
Chemical Structure Search and AnalysisProfessional Services
Open Platform
Developer Center
Customer Stories
Newsroom
Blog
2026 R&D Benchmark Report
Glossary
Free tools
NEWWebinars & Training
User Community
R&D Benchmark Calculator
Trust and Security
PatentBench
NEWLLM
Help center
Careers
The form could not load. Please try again or email our team.
[email protected]No credit card required
Already have an account? Log In
To start using Patsnap Eureka, click the verification button in the email we sent to .
This helps keep your account secure.
Haven't received it? Check your spam folder.
Litigation | Report Ameranth v. Starbucks Corporation (22-1692) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Peter Pedersen v. Oracle (1:23-cv-01020) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report HyperQuery v. Hewlett-Parkard (6:23-cv-00006) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Incept v. Palette Life Sciences (21-2063) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Iota Kapital, SA v. SimpliSafe (1:23-cv-10879) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Analysis of Iota Kapital v. SimpliSafe – Multi-Patent Infringement Dismissed — case overview, legal analysis, key takeaways, and FTO implications for IP professionals. Powered by PatSnap Eureka.
Litigation | Report Monsta Athletics v. Easton Diamond Sports et al. (5:23-cv-00963) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Opex v. HC Robotics (337-TA-1293) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Bench Walk Lighting v. Everlight Electronics Co. (1:20-cv-00049) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Analysis of Bench Walk Lighting v. Everlight Electronics — LED Patent Dispute — case overview, legal analysis, key takeaways, and FTO implications for IP professionals. Powered by PatSnap Eureka.
Litigation | Report Obm v. Lancium (4:23-cv-01798) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Universal Electronics v. Katherine K. Vidal (22-1758) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Analysis of Universal Electronics v. Vidal — Appliance Control Patent Appeal — case overview, legal analysis, key takeaways, and FTO implications for IP professionals. Powered by PatSnap Eureka.
Litigation | Report Healthness v. Coros Wearables (8:23-cv-00666) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Janssen v. The Minister of Health and the Attorney General of Canada (T-2627-22) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.