Products
AI AGENTS
INTELLIGENCE SUITE
API, MCP & INTEGRATION
Solutions
INDUSTRIES
USE CASES
Pricing
Resources
EXPLORE
ENGAGE
SUPPORT & SERVICES
About
Patsnap Eureka Platform
IP Search Agents
IP Drafting Agents
Engineering Agents
Find Solutions with TRIZ
Life Sciences Agents
SAR Data Extraction
Materials Agents
SEP Agents
Patsnap Eureka Desktop
BetaAnalytics
IP IntelligenceHiro for Analytics
Synapse
Biopharma IntelligenceBio
Biosequence Search and AnalysisChemical
Chemical Structure Search and AnalysisProfessional Services
Open Platform
Developer Center
Customer Stories
Newsroom
Blog
2026 R&D Benchmark Report
Glossary
Free tools
NEWWebinars & Training
User Community
R&D Benchmark Calculator
Trust and Security
PatentBench
NEWLLM
Help center
Careers
The form could not load. Please try again or email our team.
[email protected]No credit card required
Already have an account? Log In
To start using Patsnap Eureka, click the verification button in the email we sent to .
This helps keep your account secure.
Haven't received it? Check your spam folder.
Litigation | Report Estech Systems v. RingCentral (23-1241) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Tubular Rollers et al. v. Maximus Oilfield Products (21-2319) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Rock Creek Networks v. Buffalo (6:23-cv-00298) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Catalyst Pharmaceuticals et al. v. Lupin Limited et al. (1:23-cv-00229) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Optinetix Israel v. K-VA-T Food Stores (1:22-cv-00043) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Linfo IP v. Nordstrom (6:22-cv-00373) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Longhorn HD v. Noon Technology Co. et al. (2:22-cv-00502) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Parus Holdings v. Google et al. (22-1269) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Analysis of LG Electronics v. Express Parts — Water Filter Patent Settlement — case overview, legal analysis, key takeaways, and FTO implications for IP professionals. Powered by PatSnap Eureka.
Litigation | Report Alcon et al. v. Gland Pharma (1:23-cv-00303) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Milwaukee Electric Tool et al. v. Snow Joe (3:21-cv-16140) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Clearplay v. Dish Network et al. (2:14-cv-00191) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report XR Communications v. Extreme Networks (22-1790) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report LiquidPower Specialty Products v. Baker Hughes, a GE Company et al. (20-2001) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Stylwan IP Holding et al. v. Stress Engineering Services (23-1269) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.