Products
AI AGENTS
INTELLIGENCE SUITE
API, MCP & INTEGRATION
Solutions
INDUSTRIES
USE CASES
Pricing
Resources
EXPLORE
ENGAGE
SUPPORT & SERVICES
About
Patsnap Eureka Platform
IP Search Agents
IP Drafting Agents
Engineering Agents
Find Solutions with TRIZ
Life Sciences Agents
SAR Data Extraction
Materials Agents
SEP Agents
Patsnap Eureka Desktop
BetaAnalytics
IP IntelligenceHiro for Analytics
Synapse
Biopharma IntelligenceBio
Biosequence Search and AnalysisChemical
Chemical Structure Search and AnalysisProfessional Services
Open Platform
Developer Center
Customer Stories
Newsroom
Blog
2026 R&D Benchmark Report
Glossary
Free tools
NEWWebinars & Training
User Community
R&D Benchmark Calculator
Trust and Security
PatentBench
NEWLLM
Help center
Careers
The form could not load. Please try again or email our team.
[email protected]No credit card required
Already have an account? Log In
To start using Patsnap Eureka, click the verification button in the email we sent to .
This helps keep your account secure.
Haven't received it? Check your spam folder.
Litigation | Report Class Technologies v. Ak Meeting IP (9:23-cv-81367) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Dali Wireless v. Fujikura America (7:23-cv-04368) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Lexos Media IP v. The Gap (2:22-cv-00299) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Agis Software Development v. Samsung Electronics Co. et al. (2:22-cv-00263) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Lloyd Industries et al. v. Datrend Systems (1:23-cv-00998) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Paul Hartmann, AG v. Attends Healthcare Products (22-1725) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Analysis of Polaris PowerLED v. Nintendo: Display Patent Dispute Ends in Stipulated Dismissal — case overview, legal analysis, key takeaways, and FTO implications for IP professionals. Powered by PatSnap Eureka.
Litigation | Report Xiaobing Wang et al. v. Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations on Schedule A (1:22-cv-02024) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Ear Technology Corporation v. Hearx Group (pty) et al. (3:23-cv-00405) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Communication Interface Technologies v. CVS Health (4:24-cv-00166) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Parker-Hannifin Corporation et al. v. Faster et al. (3:23-cv-01704) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Layla Sleep v. Direct Supply (3:19-cv-00715) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Patent Armory v. Mastercard (1:24-cv-02815) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Analysis of Recycling Tech Patent Dispute Ends in Stipulated Dismissal — case overview, legal analysis, key takeaways, and FTO implications for IP professionals. Powered by PatSnap Eureka.
Litigation | Report Pfizer et al. v. Dexcel Pharma Technologies (1:23-cv-01304) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.