Separation Processes (Filtration etc.) Patent litigation record

Technology 23 cases

23 cases on record in Separation Processes (Filtration etc.). Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Map this field in Eureka
Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

23 cases on record

Cases on record
23
Classification
B01D53/64 · B01D53/10 · B01J20/20 · B01J20/04 · B01J20/10 · B01J20/12 · B01J20/22 · B01J20/02 · B01J20/34 · B01J20/28 · B01D35/30 · B01D15/30 · B01D39/16 · B01D29/085 · B01D29/37 · B67C11/00 · B65D8/14 · B65D6/18 · B65D6/16 · B65B39/02 · B01D35/00 · B01D35/28 · B01D53/02 · A61M16/10 · A62B19/00 · B01D53/047 · A61M16/06 · B01D19/00 · E21B43/34 · B01D21/24 · B01D21/00 · B01D21/02 · C02F1/00 · F25D31/00 · B01D46/00 · B01D27/02 · B01D39/02 · B01D24/00 · B01D11/02 · C11B9/02 · F25B7/00 · C07D311/78 · B01D53/04 · F02M25/08 · F01N3/08 · B01J20/18 · B01D53/22 · B01D71/06
Courts involved
S.D. Iowa · D. Kan. · E.D. Tex. · W.D. Mo. · W.D. Wis. · N.D. Ill. · Fed. Cir. · D. Ariz. · E.D. Mo. · S.D. Tex. · D.N.J. · W.D. Wash. · United States International Trade Commission · D. Del. · D. Colo.
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
4:25-cv-00154 Midwest Energy Emissions, Corp. v. Evergy Kansas Central, Inc. S.D. Iowa 28 Apr 2025 149 d Case Transferred
5:25-cv-04033 Midwest Energy Emissions, Corp. v. Evergy, Inc. D. Kan. 2 Apr 2025 23 d Case Transferred
2:25-cv-00254 Whirlpool Corporation v. Krosol Global Limited E.D. Tex. 4 Mar 2025 142 d Default Judgment
4:25-cv-00037 Midwest Energy Emissions, Corp. v. PacifiCorp S.D. Iowa 31 Jan 2025 487 d Dismissed with Prejudice
4:25-cv-00050 Midwest Energy Emissions, Corp. v. Evergy, Inc. W.D. Mo. 23 Jan 2025 13 d Case Transferred
3:25-cv-00026 Midwest Energy Emissions, Corp. v. Wisconsin Power & Light Company W.D. Wis. 14 Jan 2025 16 d Case Transferred
1:24-cv-08860 Hangzhou Right Play Kids Product Co., Ltd. v. Progressive International Corporation N.D. Ill. 25 Sep 2024 131 d Default Judgment
24-2237 Gce Gas Control Equipment Inc. v. Vbox, Inc. Fed. Cir. 19 Aug 2024 98 d Voluntary dismissal
3:24-cv-08145 Midwest Energy Emissions Corporation v. Tucson Electric Power Company D. Ariz. 17 Jul 2024 153 d Case Transferred
4:24-cv-00243 Midwest Energy Emissions, Corp. v. MidAmerican Energy Company S.D. Iowa 17 Jul 2024 464 d Dismissed with Prejudice
4:24-cv-00980 Midwest Energy Emissions, Corp. v. Ameren Corp. E.D. Mo. 17 Jul 2024 153 d Case Transferred
2:24-cv-00152 DEL Corporation v. OSC Rentals, LLC S.D. Tex. 3 Jul 2024 427 d Case Dismissed
2:24-cv-03201 Express Parts LLC v. BHRS Group,LLC D.N.J. 15 Mar 2024 571 d Case Terminated
24-1098 Brita, LP v. International Trade Commission Fed. Cir. 30 Oct 2023 716 d Unpatentable
4:23-cv-00765 Capna IP Capital, LLC v. Cedarstone Industry, LLC S.D. Tex. 1 Mar 2023 77 d Voluntary dismissal
2:23-cv-00282 Global IP Holdings LLC v. Root Sciences, LLC W.D. Wash. 28 Feb 2023 624 d Voluntary dismissal
2:23-cv-00283 Capna IP Capital, LLC v. Eden Labs, LLC W.D. Wash. 28 Feb 2023 140 d Voluntary dismissal
3:23-cv-05169 Capna IP Capital, LLC v. Helderpad, LLC W.D. Wash. 28 Feb 2023 139 d Voluntary dismissal
337-TA-1294 Brita, LP v. Brita, GmbH United States International Trade Commission 27 Dec 2021 631 d Judgment on the merits for Defendant
1:21-cv-01801 Brita, LP v. Zero Technologies, LLC D. Del. 23 Dec 2021 1321 d Dismissed with Prejudice
22-1129 BASF Corp. v. Ingevity, Corp. Fed. Cir. 8 Nov 2021 591 d Appeal Dismissed in Part
1:18-cv-06158 Ingevity, Corp. v. Mahle Filter Systems North America, Inc. N.D. Ill. 7 Sep 2018 1642 d Case Dismissed
1:16-cv-02703 Cocona, Inc. v. V.F, Corp. D. Colo. 2 Nov 2016 3017 d Judgment on the merits for Defendant
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Separation Processes (Filtration etc.). Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information, including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing, use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.