Patent valuation methodologies (the cost based approach)
Monetising IP and patents is important for any company that wants to buy or sell their portfolio yet many companies struggle to value their patent portfolio because it is an intangible asset which can and will change over time. With certain IP, such as trademarks, the value can actually increase over time as the brand grows in stature.
Why is patent value important?
Monetising IP and patents is important for any company that wants to buy or sell their portfolio yet many companies struggle to value their patent portfolio because it is an intangible asset which can and will change over time. With certain IP, such as trademarks, the value can actually increase over time as the brand grows in stature.
However, with patents, determining value is trickier; some patents have a higher value if they serve a purpose and provide a valuable solution at a specific time but this can change if there are new developments, on that technology for example.
When companies want to license, acquire, merge, or invest in a company, they will look at the value of the patent portfolio. One of the most popular methods to value individual patents as well as portfolios is the cost-based approach.
What is the cost approach?
This approach implies that an investor will pay no more for an asset than the costs of purchase or creating an asset of equal utility. It considers the costs incurred during development of a patent and how much it may cost to recreate or develop a similar product. However, it doesn’t take into consideration the current market value of the product. This is usually considered in the market based approach.
What are the pros and cons of the cost approach?
Key factors considered are the various costs which contribute to patenting an invention including1:
- Labour
- Testing and trials
- Materials and equipment
- Regulatory approval and certification
- Registering the patent
- Overheads for utilities, accommodation and support staff
This approach has many benefits for the buyer:
- Saves time – the buyer won’t waste time in R&D to develop a patent
- Expenditure – the buyer won’t waste money on creating the invention and other patent related expenditure like commercialisation and resources
- Success – sometimes a buyer may not be successful in commercialising and selling their invention, buying a patent avoids this risk as they already know of its market success
However, there are some disadvantages of this approach:
- Usually there is no correlation between expenditure and its value because it is hard to distinguish between normal operating expenses and patent investment expenses.
- Additionally, this approach doesn’t consider other factors such as future value of the patent. It mainly emphasises costs rather than future profit so the market potential isn’t fully recognised.
Footnotes
Your recommended content
-
All Charged Up: Power Batteries & The Patent Race Shaping the Future of Electric Mobility
Category: Article | Category: battery technology | Category: electric vehicle | Category: EV | Category: lithium ion | Category: lithium ion battery | Category: NEV | Category: new energy vehicles
Monday, April 22, 2024
In the ever-evolving landscape of innovation, the electric vehicle (EV) industry stands as a beacon of technological transformation. As nations...
-
The People vs. AI: Who Owns Ideas in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence?
Category: AI era | Category: AI-driven creativity | Category: AI-generated creations | Category: Article | Category: copyright and patent rights | Category: digital innovation | Category: innovation | Category: intellectual property law | Category: legal implications | Category: OpenAI Sora | Category: patent law | Category: Research Tag | Category: Sora | Category: text-to-video generative AI | Category: who owns AI
Monday, April 22, 2024
In the ever-evolving landscape of technological innovation, OpenAI's Sora emerges as a groundbreaking force, blurring the lines between human creativity and artificial intelligence. As the forefront of text-to-video generative AI, Sora's capabilities have ignited profound discussions around copyright and patent rights, challenging established legal frameworks and prompting a reevaluation of intellectual property rights in the digital age. With its capacity to generate high-quality footage based on mere prompts, Sora exemplifies the potential of AI-driven creativity, yet it also raises complex ownership dilemmas and ethical considerations. As we navigate this uncharted territory, it becomes imperative to explore the intersection of intellectual property law and AI technology, deciphering the legal challenges and implications posed by AI-generated creations. From the nuances of copyright law to the ethical dimensions of AI development, this editorial delves into the multifaceted landscape of Sora's impact, offering insights into the future of innovation and ownership in the AI era.
-
Patsnap Releases 2023 Global Innovation Report: The Brilliant Names to the Dynamic Landscape of Innovation
Category: Article | Category: eBook | Category: Research Tag | Category: Whitepaper
Wednesday, November 15, 2023
The Global Innovation 100 and Global Disruption 50 transcend individual entities, each representing a small innovation ecosystem with numerous subsidiaries. Through the innovation data of these companies, we gain insights into the characteristics, structures, and trends of global innovation.