Why freedom to operate goes beyond just a search
A freedom to operate search, or FTO search for short, is a check to find out whether any product you plan to produce and commercialise is not going to infringe upon anyone else’s valid intellectual property rights. Although referred to as a search, the search is really just the starting point of a longer activity that should, at the end, provide a risk analysis or risk assessment. This assessment includes an opinion on the level of risk a specific invention poses and what intellectual property exists that limits freedom-to-operate.
Based on the outcome of the search, an organisation can then decide how to proceed – whether to license necessary technologies, whether to modify the invention or approach or, in some cases, whether to cease pursuing the project. In some cases, depending on the level of resource or investment that is to be committed to a project, a legal opinion will be sought. However, companies will not want to pay legal fees for every new potential project in the pipeline and will want to carry out some level of FTO analysis itself to rule out any obvious early instances of limitations to FTO, before escalating the project further.
In this interview, Juliana Melo, with an LLM in Intellectual Property and New Technologies from the Autónoma University of Madrid, provides her views on when and how organisations can conduct these early searches and the structure they should take. PatSnap and Juliana have also worked together to provide a series of videos on the topic so that, by the end, participants in the lectures will have a foundational understanding of what FTO analysis involves and what they should be looking for.
Join Academy today to access this free course
Your recommended content
-
All Charged Up: Power Batteries & The Patent Race Shaping the Future of Electric Mobility
Category: Article | Category: battery technology | Category: electric vehicle | Category: EV | Category: lithium ion | Category: lithium ion battery | Category: NEV | Category: new energy vehicles
Monday, April 22, 2024
In the ever-evolving landscape of innovation, the electric vehicle (EV) industry stands as a beacon of technological transformation. As nations...
-
The People vs. AI: Who Owns Ideas in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence?
Category: AI era | Category: AI-driven creativity | Category: AI-generated creations | Category: Article | Category: copyright and patent rights | Category: digital innovation | Category: innovation | Category: intellectual property law | Category: legal implications | Category: OpenAI Sora | Category: patent law | Category: Research Tag | Category: Sora | Category: text-to-video generative AI | Category: who owns AI
Monday, April 22, 2024
In the ever-evolving landscape of technological innovation, OpenAI's Sora emerges as a groundbreaking force, blurring the lines between human creativity and artificial intelligence. As the forefront of text-to-video generative AI, Sora's capabilities have ignited profound discussions around copyright and patent rights, challenging established legal frameworks and prompting a reevaluation of intellectual property rights in the digital age. With its capacity to generate high-quality footage based on mere prompts, Sora exemplifies the potential of AI-driven creativity, yet it also raises complex ownership dilemmas and ethical considerations. As we navigate this uncharted territory, it becomes imperative to explore the intersection of intellectual property law and AI technology, deciphering the legal challenges and implications posed by AI-generated creations. From the nuances of copyright law to the ethical dimensions of AI development, this editorial delves into the multifaceted landscape of Sora's impact, offering insights into the future of innovation and ownership in the AI era.
-
Patsnap Releases 2023 Global Innovation Report: The Brilliant Names to the Dynamic Landscape of Innovation
Category: Article | Category: eBook | Category: Research Tag | Category: Whitepaper
Wednesday, November 15, 2023
The Global Innovation 100 and Global Disruption 50 transcend individual entities, each representing a small innovation ecosystem with numerous subsidiaries. Through the innovation data of these companies, we gain insights into the characteristics, structures, and trends of global innovation.