Products
AI AGENTS
INTELLIGENCE SUITE
API, MCP & INTEGRATION
Solutions
INDUSTRIES
USE CASES
Pricing
Resources
EXPLORE
ENGAGE
SUPPORT & SERVICES
About
Patsnap Eureka Platform
IP Search Agents
IP Drafting Agents
Engineering Agents
Find Solutions with TRIZ
Life Sciences Agents
SAR Data Extraction
Materials Agents
SEP Agents
Patsnap Eureka Desktop
BetaAnalytics
IP IntelligenceHiro for Analytics
Synapse
Biopharma IntelligenceBio
Biosequence Search and AnalysisChemical
Chemical Structure Search and AnalysisProfessional Services
Open Platform
Developer Center
Customer Stories
Newsroom
Blog
2026 R&D Benchmark Report
Glossary
Free tools
NEWWebinars & Training
User Community
R&D Benchmark Calculator
Trust and Security
PatentBench
NEWLLM
Help center
Careers
The form could not load. Please try again or email our team.
[email protected]No credit card required
Already have an account? Log In
To start using Patsnap Eureka, click the verification button in the email we sent to .
This helps keep your account secure.
Haven't received it? Check your spam folder.
Litigation | Report Eckit Industria and Comercio Ltda v. Ênio Bianchi Me (2058912-53.2023.8.26.0000/50000) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Omnitek Partners v. Google (6:23-cv-00568) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Applied Optoelectronics v. Molex (4:23-cv-04787) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Analysis of Applied Optoelectronics v. Molex: Optical Transceiver Patent Dispute Settles — case overview, legal analysis, key takeaways, and FTO implications for IP professionals. Powered by PatSnap Eureka.
Litigation | Report Capna IP Capital v. ETZ Hayim Holdings, SPC (2:23-cv-00281) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Cicas IP v. Okamura Corporation et al. (2:23-cv-00292) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Analog Devices v. Xilinx et al. (22-1536) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Digital Doors v. Beal Bank (2:23-cv-00544) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Greenthread v. Osram et al. (2:23-cv-00179) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Novartis, AG et al. v. Novugen Oncology SDN. BHD. et al. (1:23-cv-01449) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Analysis of Novartis v. Novugen: MEK Inhibitor Patent Suit Dismissed Without Prejudice — case overview, legal analysis, key takeaways, and FTO implications for IP professionals. Powered by PatSnap Eureka.
Litigation | Report Stingray IP Solutions v. Snap One Holdings et al. (2:23-cv-00003) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Monterey Research v. STMicroelectronics et al. (1:20-cv-00089) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Analysis of Monterey Research v. STMicroelectronics: Memory Patent Dispute Ends in Dismissal — case overview, legal analysis, key takeaways, and FTO implications for IP professionals. Powered by PatSnap Eureka.
Litigation | Report Fibrogen v. Hangzhou Andao Pharmaceutical et al. (3:22-cv-07148) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.