Products
AI AGENTS
INTELLIGENCE SUITE
API, MCP & INTEGRATION
Solutions
INDUSTRIES
USE CASES
Pricing
Resources
EXPLORE
ENGAGE
SUPPORT & SERVICES
About
Patsnap Eureka Platform
IP Search Agents
IP Drafting Agents
Engineering Agents
Find Solutions with TRIZ
Life Sciences Agents
SAR Data Extraction
Materials Agents
SEP Agents
Patsnap Eureka Desktop
BetaAnalytics
IP IntelligenceHiro for Analytics
Synapse
Biopharma IntelligenceBio
Biosequence Search and AnalysisChemical
Chemical Structure Search and AnalysisProfessional Services
Open Platform
Developer Center
Customer Stories
Newsroom
Blog
2026 R&D Benchmark Report
Glossary
Free tools
NEWWebinars & Training
User Community
R&D Benchmark Calculator
Trust and Security
PatentBench
NEWLLM
Help center
Careers
The form could not load. Please try again or email our team.
[email protected]No credit card required
Already have an account? Log In
To start using Patsnap Eureka, click the verification button in the email we sent to .
This helps keep your account secure.
Haven't received it? Check your spam folder.
Litigation | Report Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al. v. Biocon Pharma (1:23-cv-00392) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Pacsec3 v. Rapid7 (6:22-cv-00168) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Biogen v. Zydus Cadila (1:19-cv-00333) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Cellect v. Samsung Electronics Co. et al. (22-1272) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Ashworth Bros. v. Laitram (22-1084) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report LiquidPower Specialty Products v. Baker Hughes, a GE Company et al. (22-1248) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Droplets v. Amazon.com et al. (4:12-cv-03733) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Estech Systems IP v. Primoris Services Corporation et al. (2:21-cv-00481) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Recog IP v. Williams-Sonoma (6:23-cv-00047) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Analysis of Be Labs v. Wyze Labs — Wireless Multimedia System Patent Dispute — case overview, legal analysis, key takeaways, and FTO implications for IP professionals. Powered by PatSnap Eureka.
Litigation | Report Be Labs v. Wyze Labs (1:23-cv-00553) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Interactive Wearables v. Polar Electro OY (21-1281) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Rothschild Broadcast Distribution Systems v. The Teaching Company (1:23-cv-00298) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report AK Meeting IP v. Zoom Communications Video (6:23-cv-00062) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Sprint Communications Company, LP v. Mediacom Communications (1:17-cv-01736) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.