Products
AI AGENTS
INTELLIGENCE SUITE
API, MCP & INTEGRATION
Solutions
INDUSTRIES
USE CASES
Pricing
Resources
EXPLORE
ENGAGE
SUPPORT & SERVICES
About
Patsnap Eureka Platform
IP Search Agents
IP Drafting Agents
Engineering Agents
Find Solutions with TRIZ
Life Sciences Agents
Materials Agents
SEP Agents
Patsnap Eureka Desktop
BetaAnalytics
IP IntelligenceHiro for Analytics
Synapse
Biopharma IntelligenceBio
Biosequence Search and AnalysisChemical
Chemical Structure Search and AnalysisProfessional Services
Open Platform
Developer Center
Customer Stories
Newsroom
Blog
Global Innovation Report
Glossary
Free tools
NEWWebinars & Training
User Community
R&D Benchmark Calculator
Trust and Security
PatentBench
NEWLLM
Help center
Careers
Access to over 2,000,000,000 structured data points around patents, science, litigation, and tech sectors
Innovate 75% faster at 25% less cost
Cloud or on-prem for maximum privacy and control
Trusted by more than 18,000 innovators worldwide
To use , click the vertification button in the email we sent to [email protected].
This helps keep your account secure.
You should receive it shortly. Don’t forget to check your spam folder.
No credit card required
Already have an account? Log In
To start using Patsnap Eureka, click the verification button in the email we sent to .
This helps keep your account secure.
Haven't received it? Check your spam folder.
Litigation | Report Wenyong Yue et al. v. John Nashed Hanna et al. (1:24-cv-04579) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Exelixis v. MSN Laboratories Private Limited et al. (1:22-cv-00945) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Alexion Pharmaceuticals et al. v. Samsung Bioepis Co. (1:24-cv-00005) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Ravgen v. Biora Therapeutics (1:20-cv-01734) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Gamehancement v. Bitrix (3:24-cv-00719) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Pointwise Ventures v. Meta Platforms (6:24-cv-00320) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report United Therapeutics Corporation v. Liquidia Technologies (23-1298) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Jazz Pharmaceuticals Research UK Limited v. Apotex et al. (2:23-cv-23141) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Intellectual Ventures Management et al. v. Volvo Car et al. (6:23-cv-00429) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Wiesner Healthcare Innovation v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on the Attached Schedule A (1:24-cv-03777) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Onscreen Dynamics v. EAN Holdings (2:24-cv-00251) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report NexStep v. Comcast (22-2005) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Minotaur Systems v. Samsara Networks (1:24-cv-00353) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Mark Sandstrom v. Ericsson et al. (0:24-cv-02796) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Analysis of Campbell v CIPO — Medical Diagnostic Code AI Patent Refused — case overview, legal analysis, key takeaways, and FTO implications for IP professionals. Powered by PatSnap Eureka.