Electric Digital Data Processing and Semiconductor Devices Patent litigation record

Technology 18 cases

18 cases on record in Electric Digital Data Processing and Semiconductor Devices. Each row links to that case’s full docket record.

Litigation indexPatsnap Litigation Data··Docket source: PACER

18 cases on record

Cases on record
18
Classification
G06F9/45 · G06F17/50 · H01L21/768 · H01L23/528 · H01L23/52 · H01L21/70 · H01L21/82 · H01L27/04 · H10P14/40 · H01L21/4763
Courts involved
N.D. Cal. · E.D. Tex. · D. Or. · E.D. Mich. · W.D. Tex. · S.D.N.Y. · C.D. Cal. · D. Minn. · E.D. Cal. · D. Mass. · N.D. Ohio
Case no.PartiesCourtFiledDurationOutcome
4:23-cv-03116 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Socionext America, Inc. N.D. Cal. 23 Jun 2023 195 d Dismissed with Prejudice
4:23-cv-00069 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. AMS Sensors USA, Inc. E.D. Tex. 25 Jan 2023 316 d Dismissed with Prejudice
3:22-cv-01903 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Ampere Computing, LLC D. Or. 8 Dec 2022 62 d Consent Judgment
2:22-cv-12749 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Socionext America, Inc. E.D. Mich. 14 Nov 2022 221 d Case Transferred
1:22-cv-01122 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Silicon Laboratories, Inc. W.D. Tex. 1 Nov 2022 92 d Consent Judgment
1:22-cv-09260 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. ASMEDIA Technology, Inc. S.D.N.Y. 28 Oct 2022 445 d Dismissed with Prejudice
8:22-cv-01979 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Omnivision Technologies, Inc. C.D. Cal. 27 Oct 2022 384 d Case Dismissed
0:22-cv-02660 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Sequans Communications, S.A. D. Minn. 21 Oct 2022 293 d Dismissed with Prejudice
2:22-cv-01880 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Kioxia America, Inc. E.D. Cal. 20 Oct 2022 119 d Case Dismissed
2:22-cv-12518 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. ams-ORAM AG E.D. Mich. 20 Oct 2022 99 d Voluntary dismissal
1:22-cv-11788 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. MACOM Technology Solutions, Inc. D. Mass. 19 Oct 2022 106 d Case Dismissed
3:22-cv-00273 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Ambarella, Inc. N.D. Ohio 23 Sep 2022 503 d Case Dismissed
4:22-cv-00819 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd. E.D. Tex. 23 Sep 2022 131 d Consent Judgment
3:22-cv-01435 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Ampere Computing, LLC D. Or. 22 Sep 2022 137 d Consent Judgment
2:22-cv-11857 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. ams-OSRAM AG E.D. Mich. 11 Aug 2022 169 d Voluntary dismissal
3:22-cv-01178 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Maxlinear, Inc. E.D. Cal. 11 Aug 2022 215 d Consent Judgment
8:22-cv-01127 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Western Digital, Corp. C.D. Cal. 7 Jun 2022 241 d Case Dismissed
2:22-cv-10906 Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Socionext America, Inc. E.D. Mich. 27 Apr 2022 422 d Case Transferred
Source: Patsnap Litigation Data. Cases classified under Electric Digital Data Processing and Semiconductor Devices. Run this in Eureka
Patsnap Eureka

Where the claim space is crowded

Which patents are asserted most in this field, and which branches are still open.

Map this field
10,000 free credits to start

About this summary. This page summarises the litigation records within the coverage and snapshot dates stated here. Counts describe records in that dataset and do not, by themselves, establish the conduct, litigation success or legal position of any person or organisation.

Docket data has limits. Records are drawn from a snapshot and may lag the live docket. Sealed filings, amended complaints, counterclaims and post-closure motions may not be reflected. Party names, attorney names and firm affiliations are reproduced as recorded and may contain omissions. Where a field is absent from the record, this page marks it as not recorded rather than inferring a value.

No characterisation of the parties or the outcome. This page reports what the record contains. Nothing here should be read as an assertion that any party infringed, that any patent is valid or invalid, that any settlement occurred, or that any party prevailed. The filing of a claim is not a court finding, and a docket marked “closed” does not by itself establish infringement, validity, settlement or a decision on the merits.

No FTO or validity opinion. Nothing on this page constitutes a freedom-to-operate, novelty, validity or infringement opinion. Any decision touching a live patent dispute should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent counsel.

Third-party names and marks. Party, attorney, judge and company names appear for identification only. Company names may be trademarks of their owners; their appearance does not, by itself, imply affiliation with or endorsement by Patsnap.

Corrections and privacy requests. To report an inaccurate record or attribution, use the “Report an incorrect record” link on this page. For requests concerning your personal information — including, where applicable, the rights to access, rectify, erase, restrict or object to processing — use the “Privacy request” link. We assess requests under applicable law. See our Privacy Policy for details of this processing.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.