Book a demo

Programmable Logic Controller Patent Landscape 2026

Programmable Logic Controller Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Programmable Logic Controller Patent Landscape in 2026

The PLC patent space is heavily concentrated, with Omron Corp holding the largest position among a field dominated by established Japanese, European, and North American automation incumbents. Annual filing volume peaked in 2018 and has eased materially since, though the multi-year corpus remains substantial at 11,210 patent families.

11,210
Patent families in scope
48%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-36%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Omron leads a concentrated field with a clear tier gap below the top five

Omron Corp holds the leading position in the PLC patent landscape, ranked first by a wide margin. Mitsubishi Electric Corp, Siemens AG, Rockwell Automation Technologies Inc, and Fanuc Ltd round out the top five, together accounting for 48% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total.

The top-five concentration is high by industrial-automation standards: Omron’s tally is nearly double that of the second-ranked Mitsubishi Electric, and the gap between Rockwell (fourth) and Fanuc (fifth) signals a clear separation between the dominant tier and the broader mid-tier challengers.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Omron Corporation3,740
2Mitsubishi Electric Corporation2,055
3Siemens AG1,829
4Rockwell Automation Technologies Inc1,536
5Fanuc Ltd1,083
6Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd1,055
7Yaskawa Electric Corporation497
8LS Electric Co Ltd429
9Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016 LLC365
10ABB (Switzerland) AG364
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Yokogawa Electric Corporation316
12Applied Materials Inc296
13Siemens Industry Inc247
14Endress+Hauser Process Solutions AG237
15Hitachi Ltd231
16General Electric Co224
17Schneider Automation Inc223
18DMG Mori Co Ltd222
19JTEKT Corporation212
20Toshiba Corporation209
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

This concentration implies that freedom-to-operate and licensing exposure are heavily shaped by a small set of assignees, all of whom have deep, multi-decade portfolios anchored in core control-system IPC classes. New entrants face a dense prior-art environment in the primary G05B class.

Filings from approximately 2024 onward are subject to publication lag and are likely under-counted; the apparent drop in 2025–2026 should not be read as the true current activity level. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing activity has eased from its 2018 peak; G05B dominates the technology mix

The annual trend chart shows a field that surged to a 2018 peak and has since retreated, while the technology-composition chart reveals overwhelming concentration in control and regulating systems with meaningful secondary branches in digital data processing, robotics, and communications.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings peaked in 2018 and have trended downward since; the 2024–2026 bars are subject to publication lag and understate true recent activity. The multi-year window still reflects a large accumulated corpus but the pace of new filings has eased from the peak.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1,705 in 2018.1,20320171,70520181,52520191,64520201,61220211,30320221,070202371120244042025322026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G05B (Control & regulating systems) is by far the dominant IPC branch, reflecting the core PLC control function. G06F (Electric digital data processing), B25J (Manipulators & robots), and H04L (Digital information transmission) form secondary clusters, pointing to PLC integration with software architectures, robotics, and industrial networking.

Technology compositionG05B · Control & regulating systems leads with 17,192; G06F · Electric digital data processing 4,396.G05B · Control & regulat…17,192G06F · Electric digital …4,396B25J · Manipulators & ro…3,961H04L · Digital informati…2,092G06Q · Business, commerc…1,109G06N · Computing based o…920B65G · Conveying & mater…717G06K · Data recognition …541↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20210216056A1Published 2021-07-15

Programmable logic controller and operating method…

Selectron Systems AG

A programmable logic controller, a method for operating a programmable logic controller, and a computer program product provide for parallel operation of a plurality of PLC applications on a programmable logic controller. The programmable logic controller has a data processing unit, at least one input, at least one output, and at least one storage region… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Programmable logic controller and operating method… — patent drawingProgrammable logic controller and operating method… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Apparatus, method and article for physical securit…1,054
2Refrigeration monitor unit1,023
3Methods and systems for data collection, learning,…960
4Retrofit monitoring device914
5Monitoring system for an industrial process using …770
6Object-oriented computer program, system, and meth…760
7System for remotely accessing an industrial contro…739
8Platform for facilitating development of intellige…721

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the PLC patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of a past-peak filing trajectory, extreme incumbent concentration, and clear secondary branches in AI/networking shapes where a new entrant or established player can most productively direct resources.

Decline

Field is post-peak; core control-system space is mature

The lifecycle stage is assessed as Decline, with annual filings easing back from the 2018 peak. The primary G05B class is densely populated by incumbent portfolios built over decades. R&D targeting undifferentiated PLC control logic faces a high prior-art burden with limited whitespace in the dominant branch.

Post-peak · 2018 peak year
Concentration

Top five hold nearly half of the largest-filer pool

The top five applicants account for 48% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, with Omron Corp alone far ahead of every competitor. This concentration means that any cross-licensing or standards discussion is effectively shaped by fewer than ten companies. Mid-tier players such as Yaskawa Electric and LS Electric hold meaningful but much smaller positions.

HHI: high
Collaboration

Co-filing activity centers on Siemens and Mitsubishi Electric subsidiary networks

The most active co-filing pair is Siemens AG with Siemens Corp, with 37 joint records, indicating active intra-group co-ownership across legal entities. Mitsubishi Electric Corp co-files frequently with Citizen Machinery Co Ltd and Citizen Watch Co Ltd (20 records each) and with Mitsubishi Electric R&D Centre Europe (10 records). Kawasaki Heavy Industries and Mujin Inc have 14 co-filed records, reflecting an integrator-startup collaboration pattern. Siemens AG also co-files with the University of California Board of Regents (8 records), suggesting academic-industry research in advanced control.

Intra-group dominant
Geography

United States is the primary filing jurisdiction; Europe and PCT are secondary

The United States leads all jurisdictions by a large margin, followed by Europe (EPO) and WIPO (PCT). Japan and China rank fifth and sixth respectively, which is notable given the Japanese ownership of the leading assignees, suggesting these players file aggressively in export markets. Canada and Australia round out the significant secondary jurisdictions.

US-led · EPO secondary
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Siemens AGSiemens Corporation37
Mitsubishi Electric CorporationCitizen Machinery Co Ltd20
Mitsubishi Electric CorporationCitizen Watch Co Ltd20
Kawasaki Heavy Industries LtdMujin Inc14
Siemens AGSiemens Industry Inc12
Mitsubishi Electric CorporationMitsubishi Electric R&D Centre Europe10
Siemens AGThe Regents of the University of California8
Siemens AGSiemens (China) Co Ltd7
Rockwell Automation Technologies IncRockwell Automation Asia Pacific Business Center Pte Ltd6
Siemens AGSiemens Corporate Research Inc6

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, collaboration pairs, lifecycle assessment, and jurisdiction distribution.Explore insights →
Leaders

Omron leads on volume; Rockwell Automation is the only top player showing recent momentum

The two cards below highlight the leader and the one major challenger whose recent filing trajectory diverges from the broader downward trend across the incumbent tier.

Leader · Omron Corp

Omron Corp

Omron Corp holds 3,740 patent records, nearly double the second-ranked player. Its portfolio is concentrated in G05B 19 (core programmable control systems, 1,579 records) and G05B 23 (monitoring and diagnostics, 378 records), with a secondary robotics cluster in B25J 9 (229 records). Recent filing momentum is strongly negative at -80% versus the prior period, indicating that Omron is harvesting a mature portfolio rather than aggressively expanding it.

patent records: 3,740
Challenger · Rockwell Automation Technologies Inc

Rockwell Automation Technologies Inc

Rockwell Automation Technologies Inc ranks fourth with 1,536 patent records and is the only major incumbent showing positive recent momentum, with filings up +21% versus the prior three-year window. Its technology focus mirrors the field leader in G05B 19 (1,212 records) and G05B 23 (146 records), with a meaningful extension into G06F 9 (software and data processing, 96 records) that signals a shift toward software-defined automation. This trajectory positions Rockwell as the most active portfolio builder among the current top tier.

patent records: 1,536
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access rankings, momentum trends, and technology emphasis for all 100 ranked assignees in this landscape.
Siemens AGFanuc Ltd+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Omron Corporation132▼ -80%
Rockwell Automation Technologies Inc282▲ +21%
Siemens AG130▼ -50%
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation91▼ -49%
Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd70▼ -66%
Fanuc Ltd77▼ -64%
Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016 LLC60▼ -57%
General Electric Co12▼ -73%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent records from the applicant ranking; momentum is the recent three-year filing rate versus the prior three-year period.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the PLC core worth monitoring

The following IPC branches appear at lower relative share within this corpus despite plausible technical linkage to PLC applications; they represent areas of relative sparsity that may warrant further investigation, not validated commercial opportunities.

H04L · Digital information transmission

H04L holds 2,092 patent records and a 5% share within the corpus, making it the largest adjacent branch relative to the dominant G05B cluster. PLC-to-network integration (OPC-UA, industrial Ethernet, time-sensitive networking) is an active engineering frontier, yet the share within this corpus is modest. A targeted search combining G05B with H04L subclasses covering real-time industrial protocols could surface meaningful whitespace for players developing edge-connectivity or deterministic networking for PLC architectures.

Search this in Eureka →

G06N · Computing based on AI models

G06N (AI and machine learning models) appears at 920 patent records and a 2% share, yet Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016 LLC — a non-practicing entity — has already identified this intersection as strategically valuable, holding deep coverage in G06N 3 (neural networks, 309 records). The low organic share from manufacturing-focused assignees suggests that integrating on-device ML inference with PLC control loops remains under-patented by practitioners, presenting a potential filing opportunity for companies developing adaptive or predictive control capabilities.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all adjacent IPC branches ranked by filing density and competitive overlap across the full applicant universe.
G06Q · Business & admin data processingB65G · Conveying & material handling+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch counts are at the patent-record level; branches with lower share relative to the dominant class are flagged as under-served observations.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading assignees differ by technology route emphasis

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerG05B 19 · Control & regulating systemsG05B 23 · Control & regulating systemsB25J 9 · Manipulators & robotsG06F 9 · Electric digital data processingH04L 29 · Digital information transmission
Omron CorporationStrong · 1,579Moderate · 378Emerging · 229Emerging · 117Emerging · 53
Rockwell Automation Technologies IncStrong · 1,212Emerging · 146AbsentEmerging · 96Emerging · 82
Siemens AGStrong · 1,035Emerging · 191Emerging · 61Emerging · 85Emerging · 54
Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016 LLCStrong · 362Strong · 338AbsentAbsentStrong · 228
Mitsubishi Electric CorporationStrong · 676Moderate · 197AbsentEmerging · 35Absent
Fanuc LtdStrong · 410AbsentModerate · 84AbsentAbsent
General Electric CoStrong · 215Strong · 128AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own PLC patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.