Products
AI AGENTS
INTELLIGENCE SUITE
API, MCP & INTEGRATION
Solutions
INDUSTRIES
USE CASES
Pricing
Resources
EXPLORE
ENGAGE
SUPPORT & SERVICES
About
Patsnap Eureka Platform
IP Search Agents
IP Drafting Agents
Engineering Agents
Find Solutions with TRIZ
Life Sciences Agents
SAR Data Extraction
Materials Agents
SEP Agents
Patsnap Eureka Desktop
BetaAnalytics
IP IntelligenceHiro for Analytics
Synapse
Biopharma IntelligenceBio
Biosequence Search and AnalysisChemical
Chemical Structure Search and AnalysisProfessional Services
Open Platform
Developer Center
Customer Stories
Newsroom
Blog
2026 R&D Benchmark Report
Glossary
Free tools
NEWWebinars & Training
User Community
R&D Benchmark Calculator
Trust and Security
PatentBench
NEWLLM
Help center
Careers
The form could not load. Please try again or email our team.
[email protected]No credit card required
Already have an account? Log In
To start using Patsnap Eureka, click the verification button in the email we sent to .
This helps keep your account secure.
Haven't received it? Check your spam folder.
Litigation | Report IoT Innovations v. Leviton Manufacturing Co. (6:23-cv-01848) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report SecurityProfiling v. Forcepoint (6:23-cv-00014) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report PureWick Corporation v. Sage Products (1:19-cv-01508) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Daedalus Prime v. Samsung Electronics Co. et al. (2:22-cv-00352) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Dali Wireless v. CommScope Holding Co et al. (22-1699) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Minotaur Systems v. AT&T et al. (2:23-cv-00344) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report VirnetX v. Black Swamp IP (17-2593) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Carrum Technologies v. Ford Motor (1:18-cv-01647) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Allergan et al. v. MSN Laboratories Private Limited et al. (1:21-cv-01064) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Analysis of Allergan v. MSN Laboratories – Eluxadoline Patent Litigation — case overview, legal analysis, key takeaways, and FTO implications for IP professionals. Powered by PatSnap Eureka.
Litigation | Report Gamehancement v. Infineon Technologies Americas (6:23-cv-00843) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Spin Screen v. Ignis Pixel (1:23-cv-22679) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Crossford International et al. v. Keith Handy Design et al. (3:23-cv-00924) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Web 2.0 Technologies et al. v. Trello (1:23-cv-00344) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.
Litigation | Report Bausch & Lomb et al. v. Slayback Pharma et al. (3:23-cv-22906) — docket record, asserted patents, parties and counsel.